ipl-logo

Essay On President Truman's Decision To Drop The Bomb

2354 Words10 Pages

1.0 Introduction
World War Two was a long and arduous war which saw the deaths of over fifty-four million people. It was between the Allied and Axis powers but as is often the case in wars, it took its toll on civilians. The American and Japanese were continuing their war well after the war in Europe ceased, and as a result they were running low on supplies and losing troops on both sides. This brought upon a weapon of mass destruction that was used by Harry Truman (the President of the United States at the time), to bring a swift end to the war against Japan. However this decision still has the public divided and debating over the ever timely question; was President Truman justified in his decision to drop the bomb?
2.0 Events that lead up …show more content…

About 90% of the nuclear material (radiation) was taken into the mushroom clouds that appeared above the targets, rather than contaminating the surface. As a result Hiroshima and Nagasaki recovered and became liveable faster than it would have if the radiation fallout had been higher. Today, Hiroshima and Nagasaki match the world’s average radiation of 0.87 mSv/a, and are habitable with over a million people residing in both …show more content…

Yes it is true that President Harry Truman did end the war just days after the US proceeded in the dropping of the bomb, but it is still a matter of ethics. While he did save the lives of many troops, he also killed hundreds of thousands of civilians who were going about their day as per usual. He specifically targeted Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the fact that they were civilian areas and were untouched by the war. The bombing in itself was horrendous but its long term effects that it had on people was truly atrocious. The base of the decision to drop the bomb was also faulty as the Japanese were about to surrender anyway and put a stop to the war. Japan knew it was at its end since nearly all their naval and air force had been destroyed. They were running low on supplies and could not risk fighting any longer. There were also talks of Emperor Hirohito seeking peace; however the Potsdam Declaration that was given as an ultimatum was very problematic and if its terms were discussed further there may have been a resolution instead of nuclear annihilation and the entrance of nuclear warfare in the

Show More
Related

  • Was Truman Justified Dbq Essay

    803 Words  | 4 Pages

    Was President Truman justified when he authorized the use of Atomic weapons against Japan? President Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the atomic bomb against Japan. The Japanese were close to surrendering, it was revenge for Pearl Harbor, and it was morally wrong to kill civilians. The first reason is that Japan was close to surrendering. According to Admiral

    Read More

  • Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

    735 Words  | 3 Pages

    (Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). The bomb killed eighty thousand people instantly. Radiation exposure killed tens of thousands more. The bomb destroyed ninety percent of one of Japan’s biggest cities in an instant. Therefore, the event that occurred at Hiroshima was a huge shock to the

    Read More

  • Essay On Was The Us Justified In Dropping The Bomb On Japan

    728 Words  | 3 Pages

    Was the U.S. Justified in Dropping the Bomb on Japan? On December 7, 1941, at 7 am, the Japanese Air Force led a surprise attack on the U.S and the U.S. Air Force, and this was called the battle at Pearl Harbor. There were 2,400 casualties, 1,700 wounded, and 21 ships and 8 battleships used in this battle, which was nearly the entire U.S. fleet in the Pacific because of the Japanese attacking. After this ambush, the U.S. joined in the war, was no longer an isolationist due to being attacked, and was fighting the war with two fronts, which was in the Pacific and Europe.

    Read More

  • Was Truman's Decision Morally Wrong Essay

    892 Words  | 4 Pages

    World War Two was ended when the Japanese surrendered on September 2, 1945. Their decision to surrender came as a direct result from the dropping of two nuclear bomb on two of their cities, Nagasaki and Hiroshima, by the United States. The decision to drop these bombs was made by President Truman. Whether or not this decision was morally correct has been debated. G.E.M Anscombe believes that Truman’s decision was morally wrong.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    717 Words  | 3 Pages

    The bombs caused so much damage that the cities bombed over 70 years ago are still recovering from the mass destruction today. For example, statistics show that 192,020 people died in Hiroshima, either instantly or over time because of

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    Japan was weakening, “The food situation gradually becoming worse and worse…” Stated in source H. America had many industrial resources to use against Japan and so Japan had essentially been defeated. Japan pushed only for the sake of their countries honour as the shame of unconditional surrender goes against their code of honour. Furthermore a warning was given to Japan with America promising to drop the atomic bomb, however there was no evidence and so it could have easily been deemed a bluff. An American nuclear scientist stated, “A demonstration of the bomb best be made… Japan could then be asked to surrender.” This source seems somewhat reliable as it is from one of the American scientists and they would know the strength of the bomb.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Justified Research Paper

    1838 Words  | 8 Pages

    Imagine that there is a decision to be made to launch the atomic bomb or not. The bomb was launched but was it justified? Years ago during WWll, a scientist Albert Einstein sent a letter to the president. It said that Germany was creating a bomb that would cause major destruction and the United States had to make one as well. Scientists started making the bomb and it became the Project Manhattan.

    Read More

  • Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

    852 Words  | 4 Pages

    In fact, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy wrote to Secretary of War Stimson in a June 27, 1945 memorandum. “I define this decision as an emotional and reckless decision, Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which they could use as a medium of surrender” (Bard). In fact, the Japanese government expressed desire to end the war, and would have accepted conditional surrender before the mainland invasion in November. The reason for dropping the bomb was forcing Japan to surrender unconditionally. In America’s opinion, Japan had lost the war; they did not have any capital to negotiate with.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Dbq

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    As all the world has known, the biggest atomic bomb in warfare history by the end of World War 2 is the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima that hit on August 9th, 1945 by the direct order of our 33rd president of The United States Of America; Harry S. Truman. He thought this bomb would bring a close ending of the war (World War 2) and it definitely did but it was too much to handle afterwards when it hit. There was no choice for Truman because there was no other way to bring the war into a close. It was the last call, but they didn’t realize that after they released the bomb, it was hard to decide whether it was a mistake or the right decision. The bomb killed innocent people of 199,000 (plus more).

    Read More

  • Truman War Research Paper

    1113 Words  | 5 Pages

    Their resolution to the current situation was conducted on the basis of three main reasons: Japanese barbarism and resolve, ending the war in a swift manner, and making sure the Manhattan project did not go to waste. First off, it was obvious that Japan was on its way out as most of its allies had been either wiped out or conquered. Despite Japan appearing to be already beaten, Emperor Hirohito’s soldiers were too honorable for an unconditional surrender. As stated by Tom Nichols, on an article regarding the decision, “Japan was not preparing to surrender; it was preparing to fight to the death” (“No Other Choice”). This statement affirms the fact that even if the atomic bombs were not dropped, and a land invasion had taken place instead, the battle would not have been easily fought.

    Read More

  • How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq

    719 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    910 Words  | 4 Pages

    Japan was already going to surrender, but they wanted surrender terms that they would find acceptable (Walker). They had problems within their country such as starvation. Britain and the United States had knowledge that when Russia entered the war, they were close to accepting surrender terms (Alperovitz). One might argue the bomb was unnecessary and we should have waited a longer amount of time to give Japan time to make their decision. The United States rushed the droppings of the two bombs on August 6th and 9th (Alperovitz).

    Read More

  • The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

    581 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

    Read More

  • How Did Harry S. Truman's Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb

    1106 Words  | 5 Pages

    Deaths that were not immediately caused by the explosion were ultimately caused by high levels of radiation. Short term effects include the unwarranted deaths of countless men, women and children. In terms of long term effects, those who survived the bombs showed highly

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    863 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, the Japanese were committed to fight to the bitter end of the war and see it all the way through, regardless of the fact that the United States demanded unconditional surrender from the small country of islands. This further emphasizes that since the Japanese were not simply going to give up, Truman came to the conclusion that in order to save millions of lives, he had to take thousands. President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on Japan to warn the world about the new found power of the United States, force an unconditional surrender of the Japanese, and save millions of lives. With the controversy over whether or not Truman should have dropped the bomb, some consider the decision irrational and unnecessary.

    Read More

More about Essay On President Truman's Decision To Drop The Bomb

Open Document