As I walked down the hall of the fifth floor of Townsend Harris High School, the eyes of distraught, stressed, and frightened students stared back at me. However, sitting with their backs pressed against the lockers, every one of them had a face of resolve, a will to rid our prestigious school of the new interim acting principal, Mrs. Rosemary Jahoda. I was looking at and experiencing one of the most revolutionary movements that our school has ever undertaken. It was a peaceful, sit-down protest that had the goal of improving our school community, for the sake of the students and faculty alike. This, and many other current examples of civil disobedience, are campaigns that work towards changing the current circumstances that the party is experiencing. The Wall Street protest, the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Townsend Harris sit-in are but few recent incidents that tried to …show more content…
This is an important matter, as it pertains to me personally and my future as a student in Townsend Harris. Students and teachers feel uncomfortable and sense tension because of the new interim acting principal's arrival. There are rumors about her past position in Bronx Science High School, and her harsh attitude was certainly experienced by more than one faculty member at Townsend Harris. Due to these dissatisfactions, a protest was organized by the student president and some teachers on December 8, 2016. Students that did not have a class or were having lunch at the time went to the fourth and fifth floor hallways and sat in silence while the deputy superintendent, Leticia Pinerio, questioned the students. This story made it to the New York Times, and a petition has even been created that has now reached over 3,000 signatures. As much as I would appreciate a change in what is happening, it will be very difficult to sway the Department of Education. However, the intent was for a positive impact on the school
Case Study 6 2. By appointing the ad hoc committee, has the superintendent undermined the authority of the assistant superintendent for business? When Dr. Davis wrote a formal recommendation to the former superintendent requesting centralized control of the principal’s activity funds, it was dismissed because there were many unanswered questions. Being a former principal in the district, Dr. Davis was fully aware of the mismanagement of these funds and continued to pursue the issue with the school board, despite the decision of the superintendent.
“Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements,” by Francesca Polletta focuses mainly on the strategies, methods, and tactics of three groups from the 1960s. The aim of the book was to exemplify the participatory democratic decision making in social movements. The first movement studied by Polletta was the Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee, which was a network of both black and white youths, many of which became the main organizers of the Mississippi Freedom Struggle. The second movement studied were the Students for a Democratic Society, who tried to emulate Student Non-violent Coordinating Committee’s organizing approach in seven cities in the northern United States. After the group participated in protesting the Vietnam War, the Students for a Democratic Society became a movement with a membership level in the tens of thousands.
Justin Becker Chapter 9 Response 10/01/2015 The Student Sit-Ins were different from their predecessors in the early desegregation movement in many ways. The first major difference is the fact that they used a more proactive approach in their efforts. They did not wait for a single specific event to occur, rather they decided to “strike first.” Another major difference was that they preferred to avoid the legal route of court rooms and litigations.
As outrage spread across America, college students rebelled against the government in support of the antiwar movement. While many of these protests were peaceful, many turned violent. Many colleges had to shut down as a result of the students’
I had seen and heard the protests of my fellow colonists on my way home from gathering the chicken eggs for breakfast. It was 4:30 in the morning, but the streets lacked the familiar silence that I so enjoyed. Instead of the echo of beautiful songs chirped by the early morning birds, the air was filled with the sounds of screaming, shouting, and loud chants of protest. Protesting what, I 'm not sure. I paused to listen in, leaning towards the source of the noise.
From the beginning of mankind’s recorded history, opposition to established governing bodies have always been recorded. Whether through coup d'etat or a peaceful protest, resistance to authority always causes change in some way. The United States Government changes; laws are meant to change as well. America prides itself on the history of its peaceful protests and revolutions, demonstrating positive effects on a free society. Because peaceful resistance wasn’t creating progressive change, radical disobedience was the key to change in the 1700’s during the American Revolution.
The continuous action of student walkouts on March 6 through March 8 in 1968: gained momentum as 2,700 students from Garfield, 500 students from Roosevelt, 15,000 Students from Lincoln, Wilson and Belmont decided to join the Student Walkout movement. The ties between political and militant activist Chicano groups began to formulate their demands through the formation of the Educational Issues Coordinating Committee (EICC) after the board of education decided to listen to the student’s demands of school reformation on March 11 in exchange to halt the progress of student walkouts. According to the “East L.A Blowout: Walking Out for Justice in the Classrooms” students identified thirty-eight demands to the Los Angeles Board of Education. The demands proposed by students were a set of reformations that the students wanted the board of education to consider like new school resources, Chicano school representatives, the freedom to practice their traditional language which in this case meant of allowing Chicano students to speak Spanish in school facilities but unfortunately not all demands were met because the board of education claimed that there wasn’t enough funding for Chicano programs. From another point of view, the government was not the only groups that was against student movements but also middle class Hispanics.
Cesar Chavez once stated that “students must have initiative; they should not be mere imitators. They must learn to think and act for themselves - and be free.” Standing up has become a common stand, in which ordinary people and students speak on their concerns, even if their voices shake. Injustice often occurs when the people believe that the regulations are set in stone, but there have been leaders that have taken it upon themselves to lead the community into a fair and just environment. Activists and political figures have constantly changed, influenced, and reshaped the way people live their lives.
It does not happen very often: Fifty youths are protesting with signs like “Let us vote” and chanting things like “Our voices matter,” outside the office of Ohio’s Secretary of State Jon Husted in Columbus, Ohio, then, suddenly, they learn that they’ve won. “We did it!” protest organizer Meredith Whitaker, 17, shouted into a megaphone. “We’re showing the government that they might not care about us, but we care about them.”
This is what was happening in Arizona. The Governor removed the class’s humanity because they were teaching controversial information in the class. They were trying to save their class by peaceful protests, but the oppressors or government was making their protests seem comparable a revolt against the US Government. This class was growing graduation rates of Mexican-Americans in Tuscan High School, everyone that took the classes graduated and then 85 percent of those who graduated attend college making the class a success. The only way for the oppressed to overcome the oppressors is to not become a subject or object but to join together to end the oppression.
Schools have a responsibility to provide a safe and orderly environment for learning, but they must also respect the rights of students to express themselves and engage in political and social activism. The controversies surrounding students’ First Amendment rights have been apparent in our world for a long time, and the controversies are only growing with the growth of technology. There have been and still are many questions surrounding what the students are allowed to do and not allowed to do under their first amendment rights and that is what we are going to dive deeper into through the perspectives of many cases based on students' first amendment rights. There have been many famous court cases over the years in which students have taken school boards to court after they had felt that the school board or administration violated their first amendment rights at the school that they are attending. When it comes to students' first amendments there are many things that
Today we are all called to enact on our own civil disobedience when we are faced with injustice and unfair laws, we are called to make a stand and a declaration to stand up for what we believe
E.g Thousands of people have taken part in a protest in central London against government
Thankfully, the protesters achieved success and the president vetoed the building of the pipeline. All of these influential people have fought ridiculously hard for their rights; however, they fought a bloodless revolution with wise, nonviolent actions instead of using ruthless violence. Ultimately, there are many past leaders in history that
Can political and economic problems cause trouble in a country? Well, it can since Paris Commune arose after the defeat in the Franco-Prussian War, in other words French-German war. In the other hand, the Occupy of Wall Street or OWS, was cause by a deficit in debts and many economic issues. The Paris Commune was a sort of a strategy to make order and peace while they solve other problems like war. In the Paris Commune they also wanted to keep the revolutionary ideas but they wanted to kick out tyranny and aristocracy.