Examples Of Hammurabi's Code Dbq

In 1792 Bc through 1750 Bc Hammurabi was a ruler of mesopotamia who made 282 laws.The laws were on a large stone tablets that everybody could see.He was a ruler of 1,000,000 people.The three parts of the stone tablet laws were the prologue, laws, epilogue.He was believed to get the laws from shamash the god of justice.

Illustrate in your mind living during the 1750’s B.C.E and living in Babylon. The king and ruler, Hammurabi had multiple laws to rule this society, to make sure the widows and orphans were safe and that the weak were protected from the strong. Hammurabi ruled Babylon for about 32 years. He wrote laws using the writing system, Cuneiform. Some of these laws were harsh. Maybe too harsh. Were these laws just? Was Hammurabi’s code just? Hammurabi’s code was not just because the personal injury laws did not protect all people equally, property laws were harsh and not protecting people enough, and the Family laws should allow people to be with whoever they want to be with.

“Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found against the wrong.”(Theodore Roosevelt) To start off let’s talk about Hammurabi, a king not many people knew about. Thanks to clay writing tablets found by archaeologist, we know some things about him. Some things we know about Hammurabi is that he was a king for 42 years! In addition to that he was a king of a city state in Mesopotamia called, Babylon. Something else about Hammurabi is that he took power in 1792 BCE. Hammurabi also developed a code totaling an astonishing 282 laws. My question I need to answer is, Was Hammurabi’s Code Fair? There are three areas of law in Hammurabi’s Code which can be proven to be just. These three areas of law are family law, personal injury law, and property law.

King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people. Although the code sculpted the culture in 1797 BC, the code would have no chance of surviving in any modern country to this day due to the harsh punishments received from breaking the laws.

Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law. Each type of code is meant to bring justice to all the parts of society so that there would be fairness to the accused, fairness to the victim and fairness for society.

Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure.

Have you ever heard the expression, treat others how you want to be treated? Well that's what Hammurabi’s code is all about. Babylonia was ruled by king Hammurabi for 42 years in 1754 BCE. In those years Hammurabi made a set of 282 laws called Hammurabi’s code to create justice and the laws were placed on a steele. Hammurabi's code was just because his purpose was to protect the weak, he made laws about property to protect your house and laws to punish people if they injure you.

Visualize having a king who made 282 laws and if a person did not follow them they would get a really big punishment. That is how it was 4,000 years ago when a king named Hammurabi ruled in Babylon. He ruled Babylon for 42 years. King Hammurabi became king of Babylon in 1754 BCE. Were Hammurabi’s laws and codes fair and just? King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law.

Laws were as important in Hammurabi 's time as they are today because laws keep people safe and keeps everything fair. Hammurabi was a famous Babylonian king who ruled over Mesopotamia. He created the first set of written laws in his 38th year of his reign called the law code. He did this because he wanted to keep peace and order over Mesopotamia even if the laws were harsh. Many people are arguing over if Hammurabi 's code is just or unjust. After close analysis, the law code of Hammurabi was just in the area of property law.

Hammurabi’s law code was the first of its kind that we base our legal system off of today. Hammurabi’s Code

your hands chopped off, being tied up and thrown into water, getting your eye poked out, being thrown into a fire, and having your teeth knocked out. Hammurabi was the leader of a big area and had to find some way to control all 1,000,000 people. These 282 laws were a strict but sophisticated way to behave everyone living in Babylon. When you are a ruler for 42 years, it gets hard to handle and you have got to find someway to control everyone. We will think and discuss about this question, which is determining whether Hammurabi’s Code was fair (just) or not, so throughout this essay will be details supporting whether I think his laws were fair or not. In my opinion, I think Hammurabi’s Code was fair, because you should get punished for doing something harsh to someone else, that could harm their life. The following paragraphs will be my backing up for my thinking using some of Hammurabi’s Codes.

The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi and were the first set of laws to ever be created. Hammurabi created 282 laws, that set standards in his empire and in ancient Mesopotamia. Hammurabi made it clear that the laws were not only to equalize society but also establish fairness and also protect the weak from the strong. However, according to the laws, the punishment for men, women, rich, and the poor, were all different; leading that he made the laws unfair. The women of Mesopotamia had a series of laws where it clearly shows they were classified as property. Some laws had harsh punishments and other laws you just had to pay for what you did. Hammurabi clearly showed the opposite of equal among the social classes, by favoring the rich and making it harder for the poor. With the different social classes,

Spare the rod and spoil the kingdom. Hammurabi became king of Babylon in 1792 BCE. He conquered numerous surrounding city-states. Hammurabi is most famous for creating 282 laws. Hammurabi’s Code: Was it just? Was the ancient Babylonian monarch’s set of laws fair? Hammurabi’s Code was unjust because of its family laws, property laws, and personal injury laws.

King Hammurabi was a leader of the first Babylonian Empire that brought the cities of Mesopotamia together under one law. This law was called Hammurabi’s Code, it was a collection of 282 clauses engraved on a seven foot high stele (Fiero, 26). According to History, Hammurabi worked to prevent the strong from oppressing the weak and to see that justice is done to widows and orphans (History). King Hammurabi created an environment in which everyone tried to live peacefully. And if there should happen to be any conflicts there were rules and laws in place to hand out justice. King Hammurabi was an example of what it meant to be human after 2000 B.C.E in Mesopotamia.

Hammurabi ruled over an estimate of 1,000,000 people. Hammurabi ruled around 4,000 year ago. He was king of the Empire Babylonia. He made 282 laws on steles. We know little about Hammurabi life if he had any family or if he had any children (BGE). Hammurabi’s code was it just? Hammurabi code was just because of Family Law, Property Law, Personal Injury Law.