Freakonomics is somewhat random grab bag of topics. The unifying theme of this book for me was finding ways to ask questions so that one's available statistics and data can provide an answer, time after time they used available statistics to provide some time of reasoning or answers to the question being asked. Some of these efforts were more successful than others. Some of the questions Levitt and Dubner study felt unnecessary, that no one really cares about. But there are also some good subjects.
The book changes subjects chapter to chapter. Chapter one there are three kinds of incentives: economic, social, and moral, and often incentive schemes will include all three of these. The next chapter aims to answer the question, “How is the Ku Klux Klan like a group of real estate agents”(Levitt, Steven D)? This chapter also discuss what happens when one party has more information than the other party. Chapter three ask why do drug dealers still live with their moms. The biggest takeaway from this chapter is the similarity between the drug dealing empire and corporate America, but we all kinda knew this. Chapter four Levitt expands on the crime and abortion correlation. This chapter also introduces the concept of black markets. Finally, the content
…show more content…
Freakonomics is six chapters that are all different, they all have different ideas, different stories, and different views. “Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J Dubner have subjects from teachers to criminals”( Levitt, Steven D). The book is all over the place. However it isn't a boring read, it kept my attention all the way through. The book is a great read, very interesting. Just hard to kept going when it's all so random and it repeats itself a lot. “So this is a book that is happy to take a hard look at facts: it is only interested in the numbers, and not in how we might prefer to interpret them”( Lezard,
The book has many characters with very different personalities. The book has unexpected twists and turns throughout it. The novel involves kidnappers, a dragon and (of course) the 5 children from Miami that know nothing about what they’re getting into. This book started out as, a fairly normal story.
A primary reason which provoked Dude to get involved in drug trading was the ludicrous amount of money he could make from such a young age. At age fourteen Dude was selling dope, making $1500 a week, this led to irresponsible and hedonistic spending. This hedonistic spending gave meaning to Dude’s life, pleasures such as food, females, and the mall, were all major focuses of his life. Dude recalls spending $400 a week on overpriced rent and $50 on food even when he wasn’t hungry (Bergmann 2008:109); this impulsive spending may suggest a shaping of an unstable and turbulent economic life and poor financial responsibility for Dude in future
Freak the Mighty is about a boy named Max, and he is getting bullied. He is getting bullied because he’s “dumb, slow, and stupid”. Until Freak came along. They became best friends, and freak was weird too. Freak was bullied because he was “short, and small,” but very mighty indeed.
It is an existing theory that our society is constructed via racial dimensions, and that racial equality is a figment of the imagination. This very principle is highlighted in Michelle Alexander’s novel, “The New Jim Crow.” The specific dimensions covered within the text include the unjust aspects of the federal drug policy, and by connection that of mass incarceration as well. Alexander claims that racism is still very prominent in present day society and is direct and frank about the heavy influence of white supremacy. One of the main arguments pushed by Alexander in this book is that mass incarceration is “ a stunningly comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized social control that functions in a manner strikingly similar
The book The Butcher’s Tale: Murder and Anti-Semitism in a German Town, written by Helmut Walser Smith, is both an investigative and reflective book. The plot of the book is taken from a real story, and personally I believe that, it is this element that had made the book easy and flowing to read. On March 11, 1900; a young Protestant male, called Ernst Winter, disappeared from a German town named Konitz (Poland today), and four days later on March 15 some parts of his body were found. The body of Ernst Winter was found bloodless and cut perfectly into pieces. The way the body was found made the citizens of Konitz believe that the murderer was a Jewish citizen.
(Levitt and Dubner 19). The casual, informative tone achieves the purpose by keeping the reader interested. A book written with exactly the same information and conclusions as Freakonomics, but written with a formal tone instead of an informal, conversational tone would be much less
In chapter four of Freakonomics, Levitt and Dubner discuss the criminal activity occurring in the United states and what the possible causes are for the decrease of crime rate in the 1990’s. The authors bring up several theories as to why the crime rates have decreased such as policemen, stricter gun laws, drug market changes and even abortion laws. Levitt and Dubner do a really good job in explaining the different theories in the decrease of crimes. The authors also provide very interesting points that might make you think differently about something. Some factors may seem hard to believe but it can cause a great impact in society like abortion.
The author uses great strategies of pathos, use of stats, and
He introduces a few topics properly but goes on and on about them, which also make this book a slow,
Overall the book is fairly slow, slightly good plot, and several underdeveloped
The rich whites found success in giving some human rights to the indentured servants to stop them plotting with the slaves. Chapter 2 follows the corrupt justice system. Many people are brought into the justice system because of the War on Drugs without much thought of their guilt or innocence, police just so happened to “randomly” pull them over for a traffic stop because of their skin color. Convictions for drug offenses is the biggest cause of the explosion of incarnation rates in the United States.
In Michelle Alexander’s book, “The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness,” Alexander addresses a topic that many may not know is happing. Alexander addresses the racism towards people of color by using the legal system as a tool to legally segregate people of color as well as poor whites. Alexander touches upon the way politicians use the war on drugs as an excuse to build more jails to incarcerate poor people of color. She also talks about the way police use racial profiling.
“ Killer Kane Killer Kane had a son who had no brain” was what all the bullies said to Max and that's what Max thought about himself before he met Freak. Freak the Mighty is about two kids named Kevin and Max. They both have disabilities, Kevin has a physical disability while Max has a learning disability. Together they go against their disabilities and become Freak the Mighty. The book Freak the Mighty was made by Rodman Philbrick.
Broken into two sections, the book’s first is of a theoretical approach and
The following is my assessment of the inductive argument made by Steven as seen on the website, Freakonomics, on the basis of responding to criticism. I will identify the premises that Steven included in the argument, as evidence put forward in order to back up the argument. I will analyse the evidence which is included in the argument. I conclude by mentioning that Steven argument is valid and not to be disregarded as it is a strong case.