ipl-logo

Great Emperors Pros And Cons

229 Words1 Page

Charles V was born 1500 February 24 has the son of Philip the Fair of Habsburg. He was determined since he was born to play a major role in the European scene. The emperor Maximilian I died in 1518. The imperial crown got into Charles reach but he had a dangerous rival who was Francis I. He put Huge bribes the the electors. But on June 28, 1519 Charles outbid him and was elected king of the Romans. That was the start of one of the greatest emperors in the 1500. With each of his crowns Charles inherited enormous problems. Each country had a peculiar internal structure which gave rise to constitutional opposition to the ruler. As emperor, he was directly involved in the preservation of imperial power against the German semi independent princes.

Show More
Related

  • How Did Charlemagne Unite Rome

    184 Words  | 1 Pages

    Charlemagne was also known as Charles the Great. He was king of the Franks and he united the majority of Western Europe during the early Middle Ages. On top of that, he laid the foundations for modern France and Germany. He attempted to unite all Germanic peoples into one kingdom and convert his subjects to Christianity. Being a skilled military strategist, he spent much of his reign in warfare so that he could manage to accomplish his goals. Because of his position, he encouraged the Carolingian Renaissance.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Han Dynasty

    220 Words  | 1 Pages

    Prior to the reconstruction, the pre-existing wall from the Qin dynasty was outdated and no longer suited as a defensive wall in its condition. Consequently, this represented a time period in which China had no defense system, and demonstrated the danger that the nomadic tribes were to the Chinese. Specifically, Han dynasty historian Sima Qian states that the wall was built “so that the barbarians no longer ventured to come south to pasture their horses and their men dared not take up their bows to vent their hatred.” The nomadic tribes, especially the Xiongnu, were still in massive conflict with the Han dynasty, and the danger that the Xiongnu posed to the Chinese only grew.

    Read More

  • Why Is Chrlemange A Good Leader

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Charles" did not spend all of his time and energy on warfare. He was a great admirer of education. He built schools across Europe. He brought scholars down. Among these scholars were some of the greatest religious scholars and teachers of the Middle Ages.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of An Imperial Presidency

    1278 Words  | 6 Pages

    “I can go into my office and pick up the telephone, and in 25 minutes 70 million people will be dead” (Nixon, NY Times). This is what former President, Richard Nixon, said in 1974 about the ease of firing nukes, which if done, sends off alarms about an imperial presidency. An imperial presidency is scary and enormously dangerous because it gives one person the unequivocal power to rule over a country. For a long time across many different political science fields, people have studied whether or not an imperial presidency is achievable, including most recently Harvard law professor Jack Goldsmith. In the year 2012, Goldsmith published a novel called Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency After 9/11.

    Read More

  • When The Emperor Was Divine

    734 Words  | 3 Pages

    During WWII, from 1942 to 1945, over 100,000 Japanese-Americans were sent to internment camps; Living through terrible conditions. In the story “When the Emperor Was Divine” by Julie Otsuka the lives of a family are illustrated in this situation. Otsuka uses person vs society conflict to describe the events of the Japanese encampment during World War 2 and the Discrimination the Japanese faced during this time. The story switches between the perspective of the boy, the girl, and the mother. These 3 are forced to stay in a Japanese encampment for many years; their character changes heavily throughout the experience.

    Read More

  • Blessed Charles The Good Analysis

    1894 Words  | 8 Pages

    Count Charles’ Persuasion to Religious Governance In almost every Count that has ever been reigned in the middle ages, there is no leader like Count Charles, who takes a risky approach to governing a land with the idea of religion as an important aspect of his position. Count Charles, aka “Blessed Charles the Good” is well known for feeding the poor, promoting peace and security, but religion is definitely a big influence to his reign as the Count of Flanders. At first, before doing any research on Count Charles’ religious ruling, I would already believe that Charles is a spiritual nobleman that everyone would admire because of how devastated Flanders felt when they heard about his death in 1127. Fortunately, my thoughts on Count Charles

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of An Imperial Presidency

    1185 Words  | 5 Pages

    “I can go into my office and pick up the telephone, and in 25 minutes 70 million people will be dead” (Nixon, NY Times). This is what former President, Richard Nixon, said in 1974 about the ease of firing nukes, which if done, sets off alarms about an imperial presidency. An imperial presidency is dangerous because it gives one person the unequivocal power to rule over a country. In the year 2012, Harvard Law professor Jack Goldsmith published a novel called Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency After 9/11 about whether or not an imperial presidency is achievable. He states that due to the accountability checks we have on government and the democratic process a 21st-century imperial president could not exist.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Augustus Caesar And Mongol Empires

    1439 Words  | 6 Pages

    World leaders hold the power to shape the course of human history, and two of the most significant empires to ever exist were the Roman and Mongol empires. Augustus Caesar, the leader of the Roman Empire was born in 63 BCE; Genghis Khan, the leader of the Mongol Empire, was born in 1162. Though born ages apart, they were both effective leaders who established expansive empires and while there is no arguing against their ability to lead such empires, a question remains; what qualities made them such excellent rulers, and which ruler created a more stable empire? Each empire held immense power for many years, but because of the difference in the long-term stability of their respective empires, Augustus must be the superior leader.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Mongol Empire

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Mongol Empire contributed both good and bad impacts to the world. Focusing on the positives of the Mongol Empire Invictus points out how they shaped a thriving economy through increasing trade and their ability to share knowledge with others. Empires typically do not appear as quickly and thrive as well as the Mongol Empire did, but they grew from a few men to a large group of warriors overnight or within eighty years (Invictus). The ruler Chingis Khan made it possible through his unity, military tactics, and personal skills. Chingis Khan developed a new system of fighting that created stability and organization within his army, most foes feared them because of this basic principle (Invictus).

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of King Louis Xiv

    515 Words  | 3 Pages

    King Louis XIV was not a great leader, but certainly better than both King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette. He held many unsuccessful campaigns and waged many wars between him and the Dutch. But despite being hungry for military power, Louis XIV established reforms that cut France’s deficit and promoted industrial growth. And he also managed to restore France’s disorganized taxation system. For these reasons, King Louis XIV would be the best French ruler to live under.

    Read More

  • Why Was Julius Caesar A Bad Man

    740 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Mark Antony was offering Caesar the crown he kept pushing it away not wanting it, he did this three different times. The people of Rome thought that this was good because they thought yes, he doesn 't want a dictatorship. Then again he was a bad man and would have been a bad ruler because he only wanted

    Read More

  • Summary: The Life Of Charlemagne

    922 Words  | 4 Pages

    “When he learned that the Christians in Jerusalem, Alexandria, and Carthage were living in poverty, he was moved by their impoverished condition and used to send money.” “It was chiefly for this reason that he struck up friendships with the kings overseas, so that the poor Christians living under their rule might receive some relief and assistance” (27). Not only did Charles help the poor but Charles but also he also helps renovate the church of St. Peters the Apostle. Charles loved the church however he only visited this church a total of four to during his reign as king. Charles last visit to Rome was to help restore the state of the church.

    Read More

  • The Struggles Of King Louis XIV

    559 Words  | 3 Pages

    King Louis XIV faced many problems during his reign such as, religious struggles, financial problems, and economic weaknesses (Guided History). Although Louis XIV encountered many obstacles he still had great effects on France. Louis XIV was basically set up in an absolute monarchy by the time he became king. The kings before Louis XIV had created the idea of an absolute monarchy and pursued the idea leaving Louis XIV with total power.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of General Alexander The Great

    258 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is a classic example of one General Darius, believing that due to his superiority in numbers, knowledge to the area the battle was to take place and better information, that he would be victorious in the upcoming battle with Alexander the Great. Looking at it in logical military terms one would be hard pressed to not agree, yet at the end of the day General Alexander employed a total rout of his enemy. The reason why was strategy. General Alexander sought to negate all of General Darius’s advantages and it worked to perfection. By utilizing a left flank strategy he forced Darius to move his forces to the left.

    Read More

  • Comparing Qin Shi Huangdi And Caesar Augustus

    1096 Words  | 5 Pages

    Qin Shi Huangdi and Caesar Augustus’s domination of multiple empires during their different lifetimes is what lead to them gaining the title of the first emperor of their empires. With peace finally brought to their territories, they gained supreme power over all. Their commitment to honoring their title showed by the way they appealed to the people. But, having great power was a substantial responsibility. They constantly had to show dedication to their empires, so the people never doubted why they were in power.

    Read More

More about Great Emperors Pros And Cons

Open Document