Scientific research seems very factual and straight-forward. In reality, science deals with uncertainty, something that, when not used in the right way, creates weaknesses. The uncertainty of scientific research allows scientists to explore intellectually as well as creatively, and “venture into the unknown” to create the known. In his account from The Great Influenza, John M. Barry uses formal diction, strategically placed rhetorical questions, and an appeal to logos to characterize scientific research. Scientists must use a plethora of experimentation and repetition to seek out answers. Scientific findings need to be certain before being shared. Barry uses formal diction in his account, showing strength and certainty with what he writes. In the introduction of this passage, word choices like “strength,” “certainty,” “passion,” and “venture into the unknown,” …show more content…
Scientists take the unknown and make it known. The audience will better understand the scientific method if it seems logical. Including examples of Einstein, accepting scientific theories, and designing experiments show that the basis of Barry’s argument is factual. “Einstein refused to accept his own theory until his predictions were tested,” showing even the best of the best scientists study with uncertainty. Barry’s appeal to logos helps characterize the intellectual side of science. In conclusion, the characteristics of the scientific method are far from few. Most distinctly, science deals with the uncertainty of the unknown, attempting to make it known. Though complicated, Barry explains his beliefs on the scientific method with strong diction to show the formality of science, rhetorical questions to show the uncertainty, and logos to show the intellect of science. His rhetorical strategies help the audience understand the plethora of characteristics in the realm of
M1, Introduction There is always a question which can’t be answered by scientist all of which relate to the perceptions of science as there is difference in how science is currently addressed. Also, people have different believes, opinions and interpretation of science in general. Questions science is currently addressing- cure for cancer?
Science has greatly evolved over the years, there are new discoveries each time, and it’s a fact that right now we know a lot than we did thirty-five years ago. If today’s scientists were to write this, there would be a great difference between
Barry expresses the need for a scientist to possess “passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage” (Barry 7-8). He further explicates the word courage as not a pivot by which the pioneer dashes into the unknown but as the beacon by which the investigator must accept, utilize, and even “embrace” (Barry 10). Barry also uses diction to support the ultimatum he presents as the character of scientific research by using the word “ultimately” in lines 19 and 49. The word “ultimately” is a readily usable term that reiterates the finality of any notion, and Barry makes excellent use of it because it allows him to create a profound characterization of scientific research— his ultimatum revolves around the uncertainty which paradoxically captures the meaning of scientific research as concrete theorization founded upon infinite possibility. The pandering of intellectual curiosity to physical emotions is an irony that is not lost on Barry; he reaffirms that “to move forcefully and aggressively” requires “confidence and strength deeper than physical courage” (Barry 20-22).
Scientific research is a crucial part of human progress and discovery, which is a scarcely understood procedure for many. John M. Barry, author of The Great Influenza, describes the 1918 flu epidemic in order to analyze the impact of scientific research. This enlightening account of a vital part of human history maintains the reader’s interest by relating what naturally draws people in to a narrower topic. The author incorporates comparisons, contrasting key points, and clever rhetorical inquiries to give the reader a better comprehension of the practice of scientific research.
Persuasive Presentation Outline Narrowed Topic: Why you should get a flu shot Purpose Statement: To persuade my audience on why everyone should get a flu vaccine. Persuasive Organizational Pattern: Central Idea: There are many different reason why people do not get flu shots, but also many effective reasons why they should, and there are also many easy ways you can get one. I. E. There are many different reasons why people do not get flu shots, but also many effective reasons why they should, and there are also many easy ways you can get one.
Critical Review of Intuition Science is a complex and integrated system and much of today’s society lacks the means and resources to understand it. However, many of the greatest discoveries and issues of the 21st century our happening in the world of science. By using the work of fiction, Allegra Goodman discusses the issues that frequently arise in the world of science in her book, Intuition. Goodman uses this work of fiction to explore issues raised in the world of science through the use of descriptive text, character relations and the use of emotions. This adds value to science issues as it allows the reader to relate to the characters, story and science in a unique perspective.
Barry says, "a shovel can dig up dirt, but cannot penetrate a rock. Would a pick be best, or would dynamite be better- or would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive?" Barry talks about science as if it was the wilderness. In the wilderness, there are many surprises that can occur at any moment. There are holes that you could step right over, not knowing it may have been the answer or may have been needed.
Determining whether to use a shovel or dynamite to study the rock is like trying to solve a scientific problem with no clear path to solve it. Additionally, Barry is communicating that most times there is not one single way of finding answers; as a result, determining the correct solution can be difficult. By incorporating this analogy into his writing, Berry is able to explain complex ideas into simple examples. Altogether, he forms a better understanding of scientific research by explaining the different methods of
In this passage from The Great Influenza John Barry Uses an informative tone, and extended metaphor, and logos to characterize scientific research as an analytical process. Throughout the passage Barry Consistently uses an informative tone to characterize scientific research as analytical. One example of this was when he said “A scientist must accept the fact that all his work, even beliefs, may break apart… out such findings”. This is a statement made by Barry, and could easily be changed into something less informative or almost suggestive to the reader, but Barry purposely put that quote the way he did to be straightforward and clear about what science is like, and what it does for you.
Scientific literacy is the ability to use the scientific process of logical deduction in everyday life. This has made it very important in modern society ever since the 16th century. As Hurd (1997) states, important figures throughout history such as Thomas Jefferson, James Wilkinson and Herbert Spencer have advocated for an education that propagates scientific literacy as an important building block of society. However, there is a massive debate regarding the medium this propagation should take place. There are two sides to the debate, the first being the teachers who use typical teaching mechanisms to advocate scientific literacy while the other side are the teachers who prefer the unconventional instead (Balraj & Pandian, 2010).
Last but not least, science is characterized by its incessant evolution in a way that a single new anomaly can easily falsify a strong scientific theory. In simple English, even experts know that there is no ultimate certainty to
Suddenly there’s moaning and snarling coming from outside look and there’s a giant horde of zombies. Survivors need to know what to do? People need to know what zombies are. Zombies’ brain eat monsters that came out of the ground.
A number of basic standards for determining a body of knowledge, methodology, or practice are widely agreed upon by scientists. One of the basic notion is that all experimental results should be reproducible, and able to be verified by other individuals.[13] This standard aim to ensure experiments can be measurably reproduced under the same conditions, allowing further investigation to characterize whether a hypothesis or theory related to given phenomena is valid and reliable. Philosopher Karl Popper (?) in one of his project attempted to draw the line between science and pseudo-science.
Do you know why it is important to get children, teens, and adults vaccinated? Well I’ll let you know why it is important. The first reason why to get vaccinated is because you have a less likely chance to catch a disease. The second reason why it is important to get vaccinated is because a disease can turn into a worldwide epidemic. The last and third reason is so you can maintain a healthy life.
Enhancing the scientific literacy of students has been a goal of science educator for more than a century. Discussion of the aims of science education often begin with ‘scientific literacy’. Scientific literacy is a term that has been used since the late 1950s to describe a desired familiarity with science on the part of the general public (Deboer, G.E., 2000). Scientific literacy plays an important role in human daily life. Many definition have been put forward for scientific literacy.