In the end of the passage, Barry claims “Not all scientific investigations can deal comfortably with uncertainty…” This then ties back with the beginning of the piece when he states,”Certainty gives strength.” This would be important because it describes how scientist are needed to be open minded and positive. He then utilizes certain word choice such as lack, rarely, and yield, in order to make the audience more interested in Barry's
In John M. Barry’s “The Great Influenza”, he uses figurative language, compares and contrasts, and process analysis. Barry demonstrates that scientists are put through obstacles to be addressed as a Scientist and their duties as one by accepting doubt as a primary function for obtaining well-produced results. The passage begins by contrasting the ideas of certainty and uncertainty. Barry claims that certainty “creates strength” and “gives on something upon which to lean.”, while he explains that uncertainty “makes one tentative, if not fearful.” This gives an idea that there is a sense of doubt when it comes to facing obstacles such as scientist’s research and beliefs. “Scientists must accept the fact that all his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” These points illustrate that scientists must be able to deal with uncertainty by having the “...intelligence and curiosity...passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.”, which
2008 AP english lang question 2 In the passage titled The great Influenza written by John Barry he talks about how scientists conduct scientific research and what it takes to be a scientist. He uses rhetorical strategies such as repetition, allusions and rhetorical questions. In the first paragraph Barry uses repetition numerous times with the words such as “certainty and uncertainty”. This is also an example of compare and contrast, he compares certainty with uncertantiy.By using these words he tells the reader that to be a scientist you need both certainty as well as uncertainty. The first paragraph also includes examples of logos; when Barry says “to be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self sufficient, and courage”.
The use of the paradox in The Great Influenza by John M. Barry reveals seemingly contradictory statements true. In the second paragraph Barry believes that one must "embrace – uncertainty" (Barry). He uses this literacy device to highlight uncertainty as a welcomed sensation to be accepted, rather than denied. Along with presenting truthful statements, Barry makes every word, phrase, and sentence that he writes ultimately more powerful and read at different understanding levels by raising the bar and introducing contradicting information. Barry characterizes scientific research as contradicting.
The rhetorical devices imbue the text with power by describing the intricate parts of the scientific method and how it affects scientists greatly. These rhetorical devices also make the text beautiful and easier to connect with by including imagery of the unknown wilderness and nature, which relates with scientists and their studies. Being a scientists and delving into scientific research is a difficult task and it requires not only scientists, but also the every day person to be the torch bearers of discovery as
Emily Dickinson provokes this idea in her poem “We Grow Accustomed to the Dark” and “Before I Got My Eyes Put Out.” Humans’ limited perception can hinder and benefit the growth and learning as a person. To lead off, human’s limitation of perception can be a hinder to a human’s growth. In the science essay ”Coming to Our Senses” by Neil deGrasse Tyson, the author provides examples of how technology expands the human senses. The author states “If we want to know what’s out there then we require detectors other than the ones we are born with”(Tyson 45-46). The quote conveys how humans need technology to expand the humans senses.
Although, instead of developing this idea, Alexie fought it, and showed how he was able to overcome this ideological barrier by harnessing the power of reading. On the other hand, Furedi decided to provide evidence towards the fact that reading was a health hazard for the majority of the article. He explored the evolving, negative mindset towards reading throughout history, before eventually making his point that reading is “good” because of its unparalleled power. However, Furedi consistently included evidence and counterarguments, including how reading was represented as an “‘insidious contagion’ [and] was often coupled with sightings of irrational destructive behavior” (Furedi 3). Furedi constructed his argument in a manner in which he scrutinized the opposing argument in order to provide evidence for his inevitable conclusion on the subject.
Hawthorne’s reasoning for this particular style could be many things. The constant occurrences of Chillingworth, either in a positive or negative light, are significant because they amplify the plot, allow readers to choose whether they view him as a protagonist or antagonist, and affect the thoughts and
But also, it can be misleading and create miscommunication between the creator and reader. Sometimes, a metaphor is taken literal and it will be hard to change their opinion. It is all from the perspective and environment that an individual grew up with and changes the meaning of a metaphor. Also, a certain metaphor may work for some people but it won’t for others. In an argument essay from Johnson- Sheehan, he counterfeits the disadvantage about metaphor in science.
In this matter, the experience might not grantee perfection nor being an 'expert' might not lead to concurrence. On the other hand, being an expert at something does not have clear boundaries. How much one should know in order to be classified as an expert? Could it be possible an individual or a group is more expert than another but still label both individuals or groups 'experts'? How could it be determined?