Hamlet's Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead

500 Words2 Pages

In keeping with the style of the Theatre of the Absurd and the inactive personalities of the two minor characters in both Hamlet and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead, I decided what ultimately leads up to the execution of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Firstly, I decided that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern should not be separated leading up to their deaths, as they are both reliant on each other and are never apart in both plays. I decided that Rosencrantz would be passive and accept his death since he is the more submissive of the two who never decides anything for himself, as in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead he declares himself that he “can't think of anything original [and is] only good in support” (Stoppard, Act III) after Guildenstern tells him to stop saying essentially the same things as him. …show more content…

Additionally, I chose to depict Guildenstern as a bit more unwilling to submit to his death since he was the dominant part of the pair in Stoppard’s play, and resolved to write him giving monologues about life and death since he was always philosophical about the subject, as seen whenever he consistently discusses the topic with the Player in Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. Moreover, I resolved that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern would seemingly unconsciously walk straight to their deaths to the castle since they were forgetful about their duties and situations in Stoppard’s play whenever they got caught up in their conversations, like when Guildenstern asks “where are [they] going” as they are passing time on the road having forgotten that the two had been summoned by Claudius (Stoppard, Act

Open Document