ipl-logo

Hate Crime Definition

1232 Words5 Pages

Hate crime has always been the thorniest issues facing most societies that labor to strike a balance between the freedom of expressing distasteful opinions and the right not to be victimized and prejudiced because of expressing oneself; bearing in mind that the right to freedom of opinion and expression is a fundamental right which safeguards the exercise of all other rights and is a critical underpinning of democracy. It is a complex nexus to determine the end of freedom of expression and the beginning of hate crime.
If uttered words results in inciting unlawful acts, breach of social order and brings revolt and pain numerous vital aspects of social and individual interests will be adversely affected . Hate crime has through …show more content…

Samuel Walker in his book Labors to define hate crime. He first acknowledges that the term hate crime has no universally agreed on a definition of hate crime. Traditionally he asserts that hate crime constitutes "any form of expression deemed offensive to any racial, religious, ethnic or national group." However, in defining hate crime, he only gives its distinction with hate crimes. Hate crimes, unlike hate crime Rodney A. Smolla, define the hate crime as "the generic terminology that has come to embrace the use of crime attacks founded on race ethnicity, religion sexual orientation or preference" Rodney seeks to use the harm principle to define the types of injuries that qualify to rationalize limiting of hate crime. Rodney has categorized the possible damage caused by hate crime into three; physical harm, relational harm and …show more content…

Professor Jacqueline R. Kanovitz provides the following definition “that crime that denigrates belittles, or expresses contempt for others because of their race, ethnic origin, color, religion, sexual orientation or other personal characteristics that make one vulnerable…" Professor Jacqueline R. asserts that a society where the state lacks the capacity to limit free crime whatsoever the circumstances would result in a state of anarchy. The professor however advocates for permitting of unlimited articulation of thoughts that she believes reveals the
My view on hate crime is hinged on the positivist theory of Utilitarianism Constructed by Jeremy Bentham (1780) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). Their liberal ideologies are much more relevant in the present world setting. Utilitarianism looks beyond any given act itself to assess the contribution of an action towards the achieving of one 's purposes And asserts that every action should have the goal of promoting the greatest happiness of the greatest number. This theory focuses on the consequences of choosing one action against another. It requires one to traffic beyond the scope of one 's interests by considering the interests of others. John Stuart Mill essay On LibertyArgues that free crime is for the benefit of all and it should be protected. For Mill, absolute truth and correctness do

Show More
Related

  • What Is The Laramie Project Unethical

    1202 Words  | 5 Pages

    A hate crime is defined as a “ crime committed because

    Read More

  • Comparison Of The Mathew Sheppard And James Byrd Act

    576 Words  | 3 Pages

    The fact that hate crime is deemed a major problem for a nation makes the Mathew Sheppard and James Byrd act to be implemented at all levels. This act is implemented at the local, state and federal level within a nation. This because the federal. Local, federal and state authorities join forces during investigations and prosecution of these hate crimes to protect the entire nation from violence evolving due to hate among people. Therefore, to mitigate expansion of hate crimes in the nation all authorities are given the power by Mathew Sheppard’s act to prevent hate crimes and prosecuting

    Read More

  • Hate Crime: The Case Of Colin Ferguson

    334 Words  | 2 Pages

    A hate crime is a violent act against people, property, or organizations because of the group to which they belong or identify with. Hate crimes are committed against many different groups of people. Many hate crimes are based on racial or religious bias. Racial bias is the largest cause of hate crimes. Hate crimes are a specific type of crime committed against individuals or groups because of their race, religion, sexual orientation, gender, age, or

    Read More

  • Hate Crimes Are Not Justifiable Essay

    618 Words  | 3 Pages

    -Hate crimes, are not justifiable the reason why is because they’re, ‘bias.’ The definition of a ‘Hate Crime’ on page 604 is defined as “a bias related crime, committed against an individual that is motivated by bias regarding race, color, religion, disability, and sexual orientation.” Committing a crime just because of the color, sexuality, religion, or disability of a person isn’t justifiable. The reason why it’s not justifiable is because, the person committing the hate crime wouldn’t want someone else, to commit such an act towards themself.

    Read More

  • African-American Hate Crimes

    1575 Words  | 7 Pages

    I have chosen to document and research African-American Hate Crimes during the eras of 2007 until 2015. With recent cases of Sandra Bland, Eric Garner, Trayvon Martin and the crimes of San Jose University, I believe this research is more than needed. By researching several forms of accurate and up-to-date literature and research findings I will promote and compile the most accurate and efficient research of these factors as possible with the prevalent information found from over 20 different sources, direct and indirect. Subjects will include and will be limited to African Americans between the ages of 15 and 35, Law Enforcement Officials within Southern States v. Northern States, and Parental Figures of those who have lives lost. With approval

    Read More

  • Punishments For Hate Crimes

    150 Words  | 1 Pages

    The cases of Gary Eye and Steven Sandstorm are one of the many examples of what some of the charges could lead up to. Charges for hate crimes includes fines, probation, associated penalties, or incarceration. If the crime is violent the suspect could end up having multiple charges,

    Read More

  • Hate Crimes Should Elicit The Death Penalty

    140 Words  | 1 Pages

    Capital punishment, especially in the face of hate crimes, is on the rise in the United States. With it comes the raised question: What crimes should elicit the death penalty? Moreover, is the death penalty even humane? Hate crimes are considered especially odious in the comparison of other crimes, therefore receiving harsher punitive measures than most other crimes. The proposal of issuing the death penalty in the face of hate crimes and incidents is steadily gaining popularity as well as harsher criticism against the overall humanity of capital punishment.

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Hate Crime Laws

    1481 Words  | 6 Pages

    A suiting definition for hate crimes is an adaptation from Gerstenfeld chapter 1: The Whys and Hows of Hate Crime Laws: crimes that are committed based on the race, religion, ethnicity, and sexual orientation of the victim. Another definition of hate crimes that was considered was the Massachusetts legal definition of hate crimes that was discussed in Englander’s article Is Bullying a Junior Hate Crime? Which included disability, color, and national origin on top of the protected groups that have been

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Should Hate Be A Crime By James B. Jacobs

    565 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this article, Jacobs successfully makes his argument by remaining objective, appealing more toward the ethos and logos of the reader, and limiting emotional language. Jacobs aims his article toward lawmakers and voters. Motives are subjective and based on many factors; therefore, Jacobs argues that basing hate crime off of motive does not only create hardships but also flaws. He continues his argument by looking at rights given to the people from the First Amendment. According to the First Amendment, people possess many freedoms including the freedom of speech; however, Jacobs argues how hate crimes

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The First Amendment

    1228 Words  | 5 Pages

    Abuse of freedom of speech can be defined as hate speech or such speech that instigates and can create many negative impacts. Rosenbaum highlights research that shows “participants who were subjected to both physical and emotional pain, that emotional harm is equal in intensity to that experienced by the body and is even more long-lasting and traumatic” (1125). In the case of discriminatory language, if truly it is problematic, then some form of law limits and restricts it. While it is said that hate speech can cause negative effects on one’s mental and physical health, it was never isolated to be the sole cause of these impacts. Although hate speech may contribute, it is unreasonable to blame emotional harm on hate speech as the world arguably contains plenty of negative things that people are exposed to daily and can easily poison someone’s mind.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Hate Crime Laws

    1014 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hate crimes have been a long-lasting reality in the United States beginning in the nation’s history with eradicating Native American populations, slavery, and xenophobia. As a result, forty-five states have adopted hate crime laws to combat organized hate groups from preying upon the most vulnerable groups in society. Hate crime laws provide special protections to the groups that are most frequently targeted by hate crimes including African Americans, LGBT, Jews, and Muslims. Although there has been much debate over what groups should be protected by hate crime laws, evidently there are groups that have been historically targeted at a much higher rate than others. Hence why most states exclude other groups that are not in as much need for protections in hate crime legislation.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Hate Crime Laws

    1120 Words  | 5 Pages

    We are saying that committing a crime against a stranger due to their way of life, and no other reason is worse than committing a crime out of anger or out of disagreement. In conclusion, there are pros and cons of hate crime laws, however in reality they are a necessity in our criminal justice system. They are equally beneficial to minorities as well as the majority. they equally protect everyone.

    Read More

  • Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hate speech includes, but is not limited to, gesture, conduct, writing, or verbal communication that might encourage discriminatory behavior to a protected individual or group of individuals. Many universities are committed to creating an atmosphere of equal opportunity that harbors talent, creativity and ingenuity. Speech codes are not only justifiable, but are also essential to campuses because they do not allow the use of hate speech. One who is for the use of speech codes on campuses may argue alongside Lawrence in saying that it is unacceptable to use hate speech in any scenario or environment because it suppresses the voices of minorities. Lawrence presents the idea that “the subordinate victims of fighting words are silenced by their relatively powerless position in society.”

    Read More

  • Essay On Hate Crime

    878 Words  | 4 Pages

    The discussion of hate crime has been very delicate over the past few months, from ISIS to police brutality. In this paper situations involving hate crime will be discussed such as the background; history of hate crime like the holocaust; special groups and genders that get “hated” on such as blacks, Hispanics, Muslims, and Jews; examples of hate crime; prominent figures like Donald Trump and his anti- Muslim and anti-immigrant policies as well as news pieces of hate crime; groups for and against other races like the black lives matter movement; statistics of hate crime and hate groups in the U.S.; the argument that

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Hate Speech

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    The ability to speak freely is written in the bill of rights and has been preserved for decades, but when free speech turns into hate speech it brings up the widely deliberated issue about banning hate speech. There are many different perspectives on the issue of hate speech. Author of Hate Speech is Free Speech, Gov. Dean and Law professor, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, applies a strong historical perspective on the situation arguing that people are “constitutionally illiter[ate]” when they make the claim that hate speech is not part of the First Amendment. Believing that it is impossible to ban hate speech because everyone will always disagree with any idea, Reynolds focuses on the problems with banning hate speech and what might happen if hate

    Read More

More about Hate Crime Definition

Open Document