ipl-logo

Historical Documentative Analysis

704 Words3 Pages

This historical document was written by Private John G. Burnett. Burnett’s diary entry was written on December 11, 1890. The years of the diary were during his journey through the Trail of Tears between 1828 and 1839. Burnett was a reserved person who was just fine with being by himself for weeks at a time. As he hunted more and more, he became acquainted with many of the Cherokee Indians who grew to eventually become his friends. Private Burnett wrote this diary entry to show the horror of what was happening between the American Indians and the Americans. The Americans were forcefully taking the Native Americans out of their homes and making them move, saying goodbye to what once was their homes and life. Burnett wanted this horrific removal …show more content…

Burnett said it himself, “Murder is murder, and somebody must answer. Somebody must explain the streams of blood that flowed in the Indian country in the summer of 1838. Somebody must explain the 4000 silent graves that mark the trail of the Cherokees to their exile.” This event took place because American were searching for more land. The Cherokees were happy and healthy at their old homes, but once President Andrew signed the bill in 1830, making it the Indian Removal Act, the Indians had no control whatsoever and had to do what they were told. They took nothing into consideration when looking for land, and because of the carelessness attribute, Americans did not care they were ripping the native homeland away from the Cherokee Nation. Private Burnett’s document is not twisted in any way. Although he was not Native, Burnett understood the Cherokee Indians. Burnett felt sad with the Indians, he felt mad with them and most importantly, Burnett understood them. Burnett wants The Trail of Tears to be known to show what happened to his friends. He suffered along with them, seeing people die around him and when they became depressed because they were forcefully being taken away from their homes. Burnett was not bias because these events happened, people lost mothers, fathers, siblings, Cherokees also lost hope and dreams. A historian would use this source by

Show More
Related

  • Did Andrew Jackson Deserve To Be On The 20 Dollar Bill

    1107 Words  | 5 Pages

    ( A Soldier Recalls the Trail of Tears, 1838-39) " The long painful journey to the west ended March 26th, 1839, with four-thousand silent graves reaching from the foothills of the Smokey Mountains to what is known as Indian territory in the west. And covetousness on the part of the white race was the cause of all that the Cherokees had to suffer." A white soldier tells the journey of the natives as long and painful because of the natives being forced against their will to leave their homes forever killing four thousand natives. President Jackson didn’t contemplate the natives life's because all he wanted was more land for the U.S..

    Read More

  • What Are The Similarities Between Joshua Febres And Ten Little Indians

    1666 Words  | 7 Pages

    In 10 Little Indians, the poet turned extreme introvert is standoffish and rude, a product of his loneliness. A Spokane Indian who was adopted to a white family as a child, became a poet and used the name “Harlan Atwater” to sound more like a Spokane, as his white parents gave him a white name when they adopted him. His journey from childhood as an adopted son to a hermit is muddled in the book, as his story is more of a reflection of himself by himself than a profile such as the ones of Joshua Febres and Patrick Harris. Harlan Atwater was a poet and a sad man, and his journey was not a journey to be out on the water, or a journey to get away from a rough and tumble lifestyle. Atwater’s journey was simply one trying to find themselves in the midst of a life that really was not his.

    Read More

  • How Did The Long Walk Change Indian's Life

    633 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was an act that forcibly removed Indians from their land and made them relocate. In result of doing this, the new settlers would have somewhere to live; West of the Mississippi. Not only did the Cherokee have to move to a new Indian territory, but they also had to move their capitol. The sighting of gold in this land made it even worse for the Cherokee; the white men pushed the issue even harder. Some of the Indians left willingly, while others were forced to leave, and didn’t even have time to collect their belongings.

    Read More

  • Was Andrew Jackson Justified In The Indian Removal Act

    1296 Words  | 6 Pages

    The authors of each article tackle the daunting task of representing the Indian Removal Act, the Trail of Tears, and president Andrew Jacksons approach, appropriately while also including their own personal opinions. They also must back up their points with fact and reason. Each author has a unique opinion compared to the others, and when read all together, provide a better understanding from multiple sides and sources. The question the authors debate is whether Andrew Jackson was justified in his removal of Native Americans by use of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Was he protecting the safety of the Native Americans by moving them, or was he only progressing the agenda of the white man?

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Indian Removal Act Of 1790

    1501 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

    Read More

  • Trail Of Tears Research Paper

    775 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Trail of Tears was a massive transport of thousands of Native Americans across America. After the Indian removal act was issued in 1830 by president Andrew Jackson, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, and Seminole tribes were taken from their homelands and transported through territories in what many have called a death march. The government, on behalf of the new settlers ' cotton picking businesses, forced the travel of one hundred thousand Native Americans across the Mississippi River to a specially designated Indian territory for only the fear and close-mindedness of their people. The Native Americans were discriminated against by not only their new government, but also the people of their country and forced to undertake one of the most difficult journeys of their lives.

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Act Research Paper

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Tyrant Essay

    1198 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 and gave the government the power to move thousands of Native Americans (specifically the Cherokee) east of the Mississippi to the West. This lead to what is known as the Trail of Tears, where Native Americans were forced to march to the new land. Along the way, many were faced with harsh conditions, limited provisions, and death. An estimated 2,000-8,000 Cherokee members died on the Trail of Tears. This is imperious because Jackson had no right to force the Cherokee out of their homeland, and his lack of thought towards the repercussions of such actions was lackadaisical.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Trail Of Tears Vs Holocaust

    1884 Words  | 8 Pages

    The devastation of many souls: The Holocaust vs. The Trail of Tears Maggie Helms English II Ms. Autumn Farless, Ed. S. Maggie Helms English II Ms. Autumn Farless, Ed. S. The devastation of many souls: The Holocaust vs. The Trail of Tears

    Read More

  • The Long Bitter Trail Summary

    1426 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Long, Bitter Trail: Andrew Jackson and the Indians written by Anthony F.C. Wallace is the story of the Native Americans being forced to move west in America in the 19th century. Wallace begins by introducing the desire for Native American land in the U.S. and ends with the aftermath of the Removal Policy and the legacy that still lives today. The book is organized into four chapters; The Changing Worlds of the Native Americans, The Conflict over Federal Indian Policy, The Removal Act, and The Trail of Tears.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Trail Of Tears

    277 Words  | 2 Pages

    Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).

    Read More

  • Who Is Andrew Jackson A Hero Or A Villain

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    With that, came removing people from the homeland. The Indians had to move away, creating the “Trail of Tears”. Jacksons view on the Indians was not right, and cruel, but oevrall he made our country a very big and happy family. In the article it also stated, “declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” (President Jackson, December 6, 1830).

    Read More

  • Indian Removal Dbq Essay

    894 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although the process of Indian removal was intended to be a peaceful exchange of lands, things became violent under Jackson’s orders. Militia invaded the native land and violently forced them on a devastating trek to new territory promised for them. Thousands of the

    Read More

  • Cherokee Pros And Cons

    1733 Words  | 7 Pages

    The removal of the Cherokee, or more commonly known as the “Trail of Tears,” was a defining American event that left an incredible historical impact. The Cherokee and other Native American tribes were being moved westward by the American government for various reasons such as disputes with white settlers, the desire for the gold on the Cherokee lands, the desire to civilize them and other reasons. However, it was far from a simplistic dispute between whites and Native Americans. There were many whites, including President Jackson, as well as some Cherokee, who supported the policy to move the Indians west. Opponents of the removal also included both whites and Cherokee.

    Read More

  • Trail Of Tears Research Paper

    1086 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Genocide: Trail of Tears/ The Indian removal act During the 1830s the united states congress and president Andrew Jackson created and passed the “Indian removal act”. Which allowed Jackson to forcibly remove the Indians from their native lands in the southeastern states, such as Florida and Mississippi, and send them to specific “Indian reservations” across the Mississippi river, so the whites could take over their land. From 1830-1839 the five civilized tribes (The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chickasaw) were forced, sometimes by gun point, to march about 1,000 miles to what is present day Oklahoma.

    Read More

More about Historical Documentative Analysis

Open Document