3. History of Existentialism
In one article , it gave a summary or mode of what existentialism is. It presented a brief description of what existentialism is according to different philosophers. Examples of the philosophers included are Sartre, Kierkegaard, Heidegger, Camus, and Jaspers. Existentialism here is accused as being a mere reflection of the mood of times, thus a characteristic of existentialism is its contemporaneity. This contemporaneity is what makes the message of existentialism so urgent, as said in the article. Existentialism served as an answer to the philosophy of ‘today’ that deals with categories, essence, and abstract ethical systems, or systems in general. It is more attuned with classical philosophy, which is concerned
…show more content…
And this has repercussions, according to Bro. Abulad, “something of this nihilistic tendency in the air, making it difficult for our time to decide which is good and which is evil.” Thus if this is the case, existentialism serves as a response towards nihilistic tendency. Existentialism is a problematic term to define. It is in the very nature of existentialism to be open-ended and undefinable. For existentialist philosophers, though classified under the same school, still have major differences in their ideologies, yet not contradictory to the existentialist movement. An underlying property of existentialism is its acknowledgement of man’s freedom. There are key terms also in existentialism, which helps in the description of the movement. These concepts are concept of facticity, authenticity, alienation, angst, nothingness and absurdity. Existentialism maybe a response to the on problem of technology. For, according to Sartre, “existentialism is a humanism.” That is further analyze by Don Ihde, and he notes that “existentialism is a humanism which calls for the re-interpretation of our existence in such a way that our actual experience is not disregarded or belied. Man is the measure who transcends himself- only on this basis is existentialism possible.” Humanism a “term freely applied to a variety of beliefs, methods, and philosophies that place central emphasis on the human
Existentialism is a philosophical theory that was developed by Nietzsche and many other philosophers in the 19th century. In the first four chapters of the novel Grendel by John Gardner, the protagonist and the narrator, Grendel tells a story of his adolescence. Like any teenager, Grendel encounters multitude of events which molds him into what he is; an existentialist. Through the use of diction, personification, and simile in the narration of Grendel, John Gardner illustrates the cause of Grendel’s existential outlook.
Grendel as a Philosophical Text Nihilism is the rejection of all religious and moral principles, often in the belief that life is meaningless. Existentialism is a philosophical theory in which each individual person has their own free will . These two theories are shown throughout the book Grendel, by the main character Grendel, whether it is existentialism brought on by his mother or nihilism brought on by the dragon. In the beginning of the book Grendel expresses some existential views on life but through Grendel’s experiences in the book he begins to express his Nihilistic views on life, only to be disproved by the hands of Beowulf. Grendel begins his life as an existentialist, as he is confused by the world that surrounds him.
Nihilism is a world view that consists of denial of everything that is involved with life itself such as our purposes and meanings of life. In the book “The Universe Next Door” by James W Sire claims that “Nihilism is a denial of any philosophy or worldview, a denial of the possibility of knowledge, a denial that anything is valuable If it proceeds to the absolute denial of everything, it even denies the reality of existence itself” which is brought upon the cosmos because there is not any relativity with spirituality. Some see nihilism as humans being their own conscious machine with no purpose at the end of it. Exisentialism is the worldview that every individual is on their own when it comes to their own decisions and choices and what they bring upon themselves for their purpose to life. In Existentialism there is no such thing as a “higher power” that is supposed to control what a persons life is and what its meaning of it, we are our own “higher power”.
To begin, human nature is claimed as a set of characteristics given to all humans, it is therefore declared essentially historical to the extent of being unchangeable. However, human development is something that is true to an individual and unique to solely himself through their decisions. It is in our human nature to be vulnerable to imperfection, such as nefarious actions. The philosophy of existentialism states that we are the creators of our own nature.
In Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, The Stranger by Albert Camus, and the current college process that I am engulfed in, existentialism proves itself to be true. Existentialism is intimidating until an overarching lesson is learned through the choices and responsibilities, passions (or lack thereof), and the isolation of a person, such as Marjane, Meursault, or myself. On the surface, the three of us are extremely dissimilar, but we all experience relatively negative things that teach us more than we knew before. Marjane Satrapi is a real woman who grew up in Iran, Meursault is a character from North Africa, and I am a real teenage girl from a small seaside town. Nonetheless, when it comes to existentialism, the three of us stand as examples of the legitimacy of its philosophy.
These movements were a response to war and the unbelievable number of dead that were recorded in the time period between World War I and II. Existentialism was all about the absurdity of life and that life was a queue for death. Existentialists believed in the reality of the present and that anyone could die in the most inhumane manner, with or without hope of god awaiting them in afterlife. It was mostly just about the hope that people had of living another day. There was just death and destruction and the philosophy that became a mind-set that was based around nothingness (Aronson,
Decision-making through the theory of Existentialism Existentialism is a philosophy which means finding self or finding meaning of life. It is theory which talks about freedom. Paulo Coelho in the novel The Alchemist talks about Santiago’s dilemmas and how he takes decision.
That is, they have consciousness and goals. Sartre cannot even begin to explain this “upsurge,” since it is absurd, not being grounded in a Creator and Designer. An existentialist is a humanist, says Sartre, in the sense that he does not judge man but sees him as
Existentialism The concept of existentialism has so many contradicting and difficult to grasp components that it is much easier to put in terms of philosophy at its most fundamental. Synonyms of philosophy include: thinking and reasoning, namely the understanding of nature and existence of a person. Although several versions of existentialism exist, there are no set themes that could possibly encompass them all. This philosophy is valid to an individualistic level, however, it does not hold up to modern society as a whole.
Nihilism is a world view that consists of denial of everything thas is involved with life itself such as our purposes and meanings of life. In the book “The Universe Next Door” by James W Sire claims that “Nihilism is a denial of any philosophy or worldview, a denial of the possibility of knowledge, a denial that anything is valuable If it proceeds to the absolute denial of everything, it even denies the reality of existence itself” which is brought upon the cosmos because there is not any relativity with spirtuality. Some see nihilism as humans being their own concsious machine without no purpose in the end of it. Exisentialism is the worldview that every individual is on their own when it comes to their own decisions and choices and what they bring upon themselves for their purpose of life. In Existentialism there is no such thing as a “higher power” that is supposed to control what a persons life is and what its meaning of it, we are our own “higher power”.
The harsh realities of the industrial revolution created a climate of fear and anxiety about the human condition, which made many people more receptive to existential ideas. The birth of the existential movement took place following World Wars I and II and influential philosophers such as Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Sartre, who were in conflict with the predominant ideologies of their time, were committed to exploring and understanding human experience. Existentialism has three main branches; Christian existentialism represented by Kierkegaard, Jaspers, Marcel and May; aethestic existentialism represented by Sartre, Camus and Nietzsche and Jewish existentialism represented by Buber, Yalom and Frankl. (Professor M.L.O Rourke Handout October 2016). The Humanistic version of existential therapy predominantly thrived in America, through the work of Yalom (Van Durzen,
Andrews explain that existential crises are apart of everyone 's lives. Existential crises are normal, so a person should not worry if they experience one. She explains that people have the opportunity to determine different paths that their life could take and this causes anxiety for fear of picking the wrong one. Andrews main points in her article are to explains the different stages of Existential crises
We can make our own decisions that can cause other choices to arise as well as consequences due to how almost every choice has a form of consequence that follows. However, some of those options are formed due to another’s actions causing us to not fully be able to make a true decision ourselves without outer life interfering. Existentialism in today’s world still shows occasionally, such as someone choosing to go to college over going directly into the work force, yet it is normally combined with numerous other ideologies to form one’s main thought
Introduction Since the dawn of man, the meaning of life has long been discussed and argued. Yet, there is still no a concrete conclusion about the real meaning of life. A British philosopher, Julian Baggini, searched for the meaning of life in the approach of the origin of it. He points out two different positions about the origin of life [1]and gives rise to three different attitudes accordingly. I do not comprehensively agree with any of the three attitudes.