How Did Galileo Influence The Renaissance

From the beginning of time, humans have learned new things that have tremendously helped us improve as a whole. Two of the most influential periods in history are the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. Although some may consider them two completely different slices in our world’s history, the Scientific Revolution was actually a significant reason for the move to the Enlightenment. “A major cause for the Enlightenment was the Scientific Revolution which, because of its many achievements in science, gave rise to the expectation that similar breakthroughs might be achieved in the social and political arena if only the same methods were applied” (The Enlightenment). Each era had things that set them apart as well as things that made

Whether they were executed brutally or locked in their own house to await death, philosophers have suffered greatly. Of the many philosophers persecuted, some to the extent of execution, the three mentioned came up with many ideas. Their ideas were insane for their time, and the corrupt powers that controlled their government didn’t welcome them. Galileo and Giordano welcomed the idea that the Earth orbited our Sun. They said that we weren’t just the only solar system, that there are other Suns, other planets beyond our own solar system.

Many inventions were also invented after the Scientific revolution. For example the telescope was made during the Scientific Revolution by Galileo Galilei. Without the Scientific Revolution many of the inventions and ways of thinking wouldn’t have been around

He could read French, Greek, Italian, and Latin as a boy. (“Alexander Pope” Britannica school) In 1700 ALexander moved to Binfield. (“Alexander Pope” Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia) One of Alexander's earliest writings was “Ode on Solitude” and it is said he wrote it at age 12.

For centuries, religion and faith—Christianity, in particular—consistently clashed with scientific ideas and theories. The controversy and debate, beginning from the Middle Ages, ranged from issues about the position of the Earth in the solar system, to the practice of medicine. Still, creationism and evolution, sparked immense disagreement amongst the religious and scientific communities, in comparison to any other issue. While major systems of faith strongly declare that their respective God created the universe and the earth, scientists such as Charles Darwin and George Lemaitre proposed theories of evolution and the Big Bang. Unable to come to a consensus, religion and science often do not associate with each other.

Over the course of history, there have been several technologies and theories that have either been altered or restored by advancements in the field of science. These theories and technologies were all developed and invented by renowned philosophers and scientists during the scientific revolution. Two scientists, Isaac Newton and Galileo Galilei both developed their own theories which were used to change old teachings and would eventually revolutionize the world. All these new ideas and innovative technologies replaced previous traditions and shifted the world’s attention resulting into them to have various different reactions.

Galileo Galilei was born February 15, 1564. In Pisa, Italy. His Parents were Talent their self. His dad was Vincenzo Galilei.

This is where he discovered his love for writing. In school, Arthur was bullied, which plays into his style of writing later on. In 1876, Arthur started his education in medicine, which came to a shock to his artistic family. Whenever trying to support his family with just being a doctor didn't work out that well, he began to write short stories for extra money.

According to the world history book from Bob Jones University, Galileo was a heretic, when it states “When Galileo published his findings, however, he also came into conflict with the Roman Catholic Church, which tried him for heresy.” I think the textbook was accurate in its belief that Galileo was a heretic because the definition of heresy is a “belief or opinion contrary to orthodox religious doctrine.” Galileo was an iconoclast because his theory that stated the earth revolved around the sun disagreed with the Roman Catholic Church’s belief of a geocentric galaxy. Galileo was opposed by cardinals, the Roman Catholic Church, philosophers, scholars, and, according to the holy Fathers, the Bible itself. Galileo was a heretic because his discoveries

Once he returned from his voyage in 1836, he decided to settle down and begin a family. He began to summarize and write his discoveries. However, it took him many years to publish his writings because he believed that what he found would become difficult to convert others to believe what he observed. “Charles knew this was difficult to explain, even more difficult to persuade others of, and as it violated the doctrine of the immutability of species and challenged creation-based explanations, very dangerous territory.” (Chapter 1, page 27) Darwin did not want to start controversy with others thoughts and beliefs.

Galileo became a professor of mathematics in Padua. During this time his income increased but due to the death of his father, he was expected to take care of the finances for the rest of his family. Here at Padua he was allowed to speak more openly and taught for eighteen years. His lectures focused mainly on geometry, and astronomy. He also continued his work of the movement of objects during this time.

The information presented on this website is crucial to be able to understand how Galileo improved our understanding of the world today.

The cause of this has many open opinions: Newton’s misfortune of not having a higher position by England’s new monarchs, Mary II and William III, or the loss of his friendship with Duillier. Others have their opinions that Newton was exhausted from working long hard hours or even mercury poisoning from all his decades of alchemical research. It is difficult to know the exact reason, but there has been evidence suggesting that Newton had wrote many letters to his London colleagues, including Duillier, that seemed insane and delusional, and accused them all of dishonesty and

In Pauline Watts excerpt, “Science, Religion, and Columbus’s Enterprise of the Indies,” she begins by stating that the idea that Columbus was a scientific innovator might not be entirely true. She then proceeds to present the fact that his “Enterprise of the Indies” which got him his approval to sail drew from many older sources which would point to the fact that he is not as big an innovator as we are led on to believe. The two main sources he supposedly used were the Imago Mundi by Pierre d’Ailly and a group of letters written by Paolo Toscanelli which both stated something related to riches being “reached by sailing west rather than by traveling overland to the east” (15). With this new view of Columbus not exactly being as respectable as