Who is Patrick Henry in the revolution? What are his notable contributions to America, particularly to the American war of independence? To begin with, Patrick Henry is one of the greatest firebrands of the American Revolution. This founding father has served as a governor in Virginia for several fruitful terms. In 1765, he has been elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses where he has made protests towards the unjust colonial policies. He has gained attention when he has made an argument with the Stamp Act of 1765. The Stamp Act’s purpose is to generate income to settle Britain’s debts from the French and Indian wars. Also, the revenue has been used in support to the British troops. The Stamp Act has been implemented without the consent of the colonies which has consequently pushed …show more content…
Meanwhile, America hasn’t been ready to defend their hopeful land, but there has already been a number of strong leaders who have led America. These leaders have encouraged the patriots to continuously fight for independence and one of these is Patrick Henry. During the convention in Virginia on March 23 1775, Henry has presented resolutions for the defense of their country against the raging attacks of Britain. At that moment, he has made an argument on taking military actions through his most renowned speech. Most of the lines from his speech have given inspiration to the patriots to fight for independence, more specifically the last part of the speech which states, “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!” A month after his speech, the revolutionary war has begun. The efforts of Patrick Henry haven’t stopped there. During the war, he has supported George Washington and the continental army by sending more
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
On May 1765, Henry was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses and in his time he served in Virginia House of Burgesses; he was a member of the Virginia committee of Correspondence, a delegate to the Virginia Convention, and a delegate to the Virginia Constitution Ratification Convention. Henry was an outspoken critic of the United States Constitution. He feared that because the Constitution was lacking in an outlined Bill of Rights, the country would devolve into a monarchy. He stressed that an overly centralized government could limit the basic rights of the people, thus he argued for a government where the power would lay in the hands of the states In 1788, at the Virginia convention where Henry served as a representative, he voted against the ratification of the Constitution, and delivered the infamous speech known as “Speech against the U.S. Constitution at the Virginia Ratifying Convention”.
A Fight to the Liberty or Death Patrick Henry was a governor, lawyer and Founding Father contributing great wisdom to America. In his 1775 “ Liberty or Death” speech, he informs and convinces the Virginia delegates to get their militia organized and prepared to fight in Revolutionary War against Britain. They were defenseless and he didn’t want them to lose the bit of freedom they had. He had a strong and passionate voice that made an impression on the colonists. He used fear to portray his views and awaken the colonists to the consequence that would be their future.
An outspoken opponent of the Stamp and Townshend Act levied by England, he stirred discord with the famous Give me Liberty or Give me Death speech to the Virginia assembly in 1755. The Stamp Act was part of British Parliament in 1765 that demanded profits from the American colonies by imposing a stamp duty on newspapers and legal and commercial documents. During the time of the Second Convention Patrick Henry answered to the British oppressive rule over the American colonies by claiming “I know not what course other take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death”. In events that led to the Revolution he took a fundamental stance on George III on the Stamp Act. He opposed the tariffs by the Townshend Act and the British attempt to collect them by using the Royal Navy and naval courts-martial to apprehend and punish smugglers.
American Democracy The nation of America was started by founders that had deist beliefs and who believed that all men are created equal and should have equal rights. The founding fathers all thought that all humans are perfect but make mistakes; this is the deist belief. They took ideas from the puritans who thought that all men are evil and we must try to be perfect. American democracy was created by founders with deist principles.
He states, “Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason toward my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.” Henry denounces King George by pointing out God is the true king and will always remain above him. Henry effectively creates an illusion that God favors the colonist rather than its counterpart, and that not rebelling against the British would be an act of treason. Henry utilizes both rhetoric devices of pathos and ethos to cause an enlargement in emotions with the colonists by incorporating God in their conflict. In the second paragraph of Patrick Henry’s speech, Henry mentions, “It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
Patrick Henry gave his famous, "Give me liberty or give me death!" speech in 1775 at the Second Virginia Convention. Patrick Henry talks about many different topics in his speech. He talks about liberty, false hope, and fighting back against Britain. I think he is one of the most influential founding fathers because of this famous speech. The Revolutionary War may not have happened if it wasn't for Patrick Henry.
I would imagine that the idea of an independent American was not an easy idea for many to stand by. Many would have probably thought that it was an effort that was not worth the risks, that fighting the kingdom of Britain would bring too heavy a cost. But of course, there were those with enough courage to speak openly about their feelings on their country 's situation. Patrick Henry seemed like a man that was willing to do whatever it took to gain independence. Henry’s letter made me proud to be an American, and to know that these men and women were coming together to fight for a better future.
ATTENTION GETTER: On this very day, 241 years ago, in front of the second Virginia Convention, a man stood up and gave a speech. The passion he conveyed through his words would be immortalized in american culture. PSYCHOLOGICAL ORIENTATION: “Give me liberty or give me death!”.
On March 23, 1775, Patrick Henry is addressing the Virginia Convention, specifically President Peyton Randolph. He offers a solution to the patriots of Virginia to form a local militia in order to be ready to fight the British. Carrying a passionate and pleading tone, Henry urges to persuade the patriots
Patrick Henry’s claim in his speech to the Virginia Convention is war with England is the only way to win freedom and their desires because England makes this the only choice. Before Patrick went up there were other men that had spoken before him, these men were speaking their views on whether or not they should initialize the war. Once Patrick has his chance to say his part he believes that they should fight because England hasn’t been fair. Patrick states this basically by saying “An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us”. This is such a powerful statement because what he’s proposing is extremely dangerous.
In 1775 the American Colonies stood at a tipping point. Britain and the Colonies had been embroiled in a continuing struggle over numerous injustices, and the Colonies seemed at long last situated to engage in a revolution against Britain. However, the colonial representatives were still tied up in negotiations with Britain, and many delegates of the Virginia Convention wanted to delay actions until the negotiations had concluded. Patrick Henry disagreed with the delay, so he addressed the Convention, arguing for the need to mobilize troops against the British, a request tantamount to treason. Instead of shying away from the polarizing nature of his argument, Henry adopted a respectful, but urgent, tone, crafting an argument that would inspire his audience into action.
Patrick Henry, former governor of Virginia, bravely spoke on the 23rd of March, 1775, at St. John’s Church, introducing his strategies to end the American Revolution in victory. The speech was so inspiring that it ignited a massive flame of patriotism. Americans began to greatly support his political ideology. Due to his stirring choice of words, the phrase “Give me liberty, or give me death!” impacted the listeners, making his remarkable words yet known to this date.
Patrick Henry an American colonist who opposed of British rule spoke out on March 23, 1775 to explain his disagreement on the British having control over the American colonies. In "Speech in the Virginia Convention," Patrick Henry uses the rhetorical appeals ethos, pathos, and logos. Patrick Henry uses the rhetorical appeals to persuade Virginian patriots to go to war seeing no other option and believing there was no more working out disagreements. First Patrick Henry uses the rhetorical appeal ethos by appealing to the audience trust and credibility. For instance, “...An act of disloyalty towards the majesty of heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.
Patrick Henry’s 1775 speech at the second Virginia Convention, commonly referred to as “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!” in reference to a famous quote lifted from the speech itself, masterfully reflects the requirement for revolution the United States of America had during the time period. The speech not only stands as an emblem of the American Revolution, but as a call-to-arms against any tyranny men that would rear its head anywhere in history, whether this long-term outcome was intended or otherwise. The effectiveness Henry displayed in rallying his peers is certainly inspirational, and his capability cannot be understated. This capability can be attributed to many different factors.