In the 1817 novel Frankenstein: The Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley, there are certain predictions that can be deducted after reading the first four chapters. Based on historical context and parallels that have already been established with the story of Prometheus the Greek God, certain factual insights can aid in the establishment of very reasonable and concrete predictions. It is through these insights that one may deduce the likelihood of another season of illness for Frankenstein that may potentially continue to reoccur.
In the story of Prometheus, Prometheus finds himself in trouble with Zeus after stealing fire from him and giving it to the humans. In simpler terms, Prometheus took something from the Gods and it now found itself in human hands. At this point the novel, Frankenstein already shares a similarity with the ancient story from greek mythology. In Chapter 3, page 35, Frankenstein states “I possessed the capacity of bestowing animation,” something that had previously been left only to a higher power. Thus, Frankenstein himself has taken something divine and bestowed upon himself the ability to do something no other human can. …show more content…
Now, because he was a God himself, Prometheus’ liver would grow back ,thus, causing the punishment to reoccur daily. To relate that back to the novel, Frankenstein, after Frankenstein created the monster, he went a little crazy “this was the commencement of a nervous fever which confined me (Frankenstein) for months,” (Shelley 50). To draw a reasonable prediction, the parellel would simply continue, thus it is deduced that Frankenstein may recover from his illness but that it will continue to haunt trouble him in the future and perhaps be a reoccuring illness. Historical context also back up this
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, there are two monsters within the book. The creature kills off many people and causes ruin to both Victor and innocent bystanders, but Victor holds the responsibility for causing this rampage, as he created the creature. Both Victor and the creature are monsters in their own respects and share similarities while holding key differences, but Victor is clearly the bigger monster. Victor and the creature are alike in many ways, and go through similar experiences that help to shape their future personas.
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or the modern Prometheus Victor Frankenstein, the protagonist, displays the behavior of evil due to his nature, the reason for his natured evil is because of his will to create life and succeeds. In the evil Victor has done, he irrevocable realizes the full implications of his evil actions. “It was on a dreary night of November that I looked at my accomplishment… I saw the dull, yellow eye of the creature open.” (Shelly 53). This quote displays Victors evil, his creation of life, his thirst for knowledge, his nature, is what caused his creation of the nameless monster.
The pregnant Mary Dempster delivers a malformed and unnaturally small new born child. That single moment of her life causes signification to compel and defy their own personal devil. In the same way, in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein; the modern Prometheus, Victor Frankenstein’s ultimate accomplishment
He had not thought about the downfall his actions could bring until after the monster was created. This novel is often referred to as The Modern Prometheus. In greek mythology, Prometheus is known for stealing fire from the gods, and giving it to mankind. This can be compared to Victor because he stole God’s job; he created life. Victor abused his understanding of human anatomy and created another being, which led to disaster in his life.
Frankenstein Essay Connor McGuire 11/9/17 The Story of Frankenstein is a story of sadness, pain, and loss. It has shown itself as an incredible achievement in literature and its captivated readers for over two centuries. One observation remains though. This story is not only known as Frankenstein but also as The Modern Prometheus. This story, as can be seen, draws many parallels with the story of Prometheus and it’s characters.
Only wanted one thing in his life, the monster wants someone who will love him and care for him but, the doctor refuses to help. If the Frankenstein would have accepted his creation from the beginning the monster wouldn’t have seen the world as a cruel place. The monster killed Frankenstein not physically but, by killing everything the doctor loved. The monster would have been differently only if he’d been accepted from creation. In “Frankenstein or, The Modern Prometheus” by Mary Shelly the doctor uses a power to bring back the dead, but instead of accepting his creation he releases it onto the world, and rejects the monster leading to deaths of those close to
In both Frankenstein and The Rime of the Ancient Mariner an individual was judged by a power larger than any individual. In Frankenstein the monster was judged by society as a whole such as when “[Felix] dashed me [the monster] to the ground and struck me violently with a stick.” (Shelley ??) after simply seeing the monster in the cottage having a conversation with his father. Their immediate inclination towards violence demonstrates the way that society judges superficially, because their sole justification was how the monster appeared.
Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a gothic novel that tells the story of scientist, Victor Frankenstein, and his obsession with creating human life. This leads him to creating a gruesome monster made of body-parts stolen from grave yards, whom upon discovering his hideousness, the monster seeks revenge against his creator, causing Victor to regret the creation of his monster for the rest of his life. Shelley uses the literary elements of personification, imagery, and similes to give a vivid sense and visualization of Victor Frankenstein’s thoughts and feelings as well as to allow us to delve deeper into the monster’s actions and emotions. Throughout the novel, Shelley uses personification of various forces and objects to reflect the effect in Victor’s actions.
In Homer’s Odyssey, Odysseus has to choose between going near Scylla or Charybdis, but both are incredibly dangerous; even so, he decides to go near Scylla. However, by going near Scylla he has lost six of his companions, although if he went near Charybdis all his companions would perish. In this scenario, Odysseus chooses Scylla as the lesser of two evils. Similarly, in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley when deciding whether Victor Frankenstein, or the creature is a bigger monster, it is clear that both have committed absolutely abhorrent actions in their lives; nonetheless, the creature is the lesser of two evils in this instance. Furthermore, we must understand the underlying similarity and evil that both of them have been responsible, either directly or
Throughout Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a great comparison is shown between Victor Frankenstein, the main character, and Prometheus, one of Greek mythology’s greatest Gods. Shelley borrows from the tale of Prometheus a consequence resulting from searching for a great source of enlightenment and power. In creating a being and giving it life, Frankenstein seems to take on the remarkable role of God which leads him to thinking that a power that is so heavenly cannot be played with by mankind. During his quest to expand his creative knowledge, abilities, drive, and ambition to know the origin of life, he puts himself in conflict. Frankenstein gambled his way into the godly realm without realizing he committed a sin by creating the monster, and
By connecting the character of Viktor to Prometheus, and adding an allusion to create a better understanding of the characters Shelley allows the reader to uncover the fate of both characters along with their creations and the punishments that follow. The connection to the greek myth, allows the readers to take on a second perspective when reading Frankenstein. The very prevalent themes enhance not only the authors writing but also the characters themselves. Overall, Shelley’s use of Prometheus as a silent background helped foreshadow the inevitable fate of Frankenstein's creator,
In the beginning the sight of his creation petrified Victor Frankenstein. As the novel progresses the relationship and the similarities between the Creature and Dr. Frankenstein become extremely obvious. They possess a need for knowledge which leads to extreme curiosity; which then lead to the creation of the Creature. They also both use nature to their advantage in many situations throughout the novel. The biggest similarity throughout the novel comes from the unending need for revenge.
“Whenever the creation order is inverted, there is disorder, destruction, and death. When we tamper with this order, even a little, we become life-takers rather than life-givers”(J. Ligon Duncan III ). This quote plays a large part in the overall literature that is Frankenstein; it pulls together the attributes of the story in a way I haven’t seen before. This essay will be focusing on the relationship between the gothic novel of Frankenstein, and the greek myth of Prometheus. It will be a compare and contrast of the dueling stories.
He also views Victor Frankenstein as the modern Prometheus that is stated in the title of the book. He argues Victor rebels against the divinely arranged order, steals spark from heaven, as illustrated in the book and creates a creature in his image (Cantor para. 3). However, just like Prometheus, he ends up bringing destruction and disaster upon the very people he was trying to help. The monster created by Victor plays a good role of the Prometheus in Shelly’s story (Shelley 104). Moreover, Paul also agrees with the Hetherington’s view that Frankenstein despite playing the role of God in creating the monster, he also compares himself to Satan.