I believe that the American Revolution was revolutionary because there were many events, impacts, and effects after the war was over. When something is “Revolutionary” it means that it causes a dramatic or drastic change. In 1776, the Declaration of Independence was written all because the people needed to be heard, from document 2. What if the King listened, would there still have been a war? I do not believe so because so much time was spent trying to get the people’s point across, and it worked, after the war. Almost everything changed after the war, no more king, taxes, or tyranny. The cause was the war, but there was no effect on slavery or segregation. Going back to the Declaration, that was the main focus of the people, all of their
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Cromwell’s next revolutionary, perhaps controversial idea for the Church of England was the translation of the bible, converting it from Latin to English. As previously mentioned, Henry was reluctant in directing his new church away from Catholicism, rather shaping it around the same traditional practices. Nonetheless, Cromwell pursued the king, who was at this time with his new love, Jane Seymour and in a particularly good mood. Persuading the king was almost like a second language for Cromwell at this point and after the pull of his ear, Henry consented. John Schofield describes this as Cromwell’s “Crowning mercy” by convincing Henry.
Massachusetts impact to colonial America was thoroughly important. Many events leading up to the American Revolution occurred in Massachusetts; events such as the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party. The crown responded to these events by closing Boston ports in 1774. These events fueled colonist’s desire to fight the Crown, and lit the fuze to the American Revolution. Founding Fathers such as John Adams, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and Joseph Warren.
How Revolutionary Was the Revolution? The Revolutionary War was revolutionary and radical. This is supported because pre-revolution compared to post-revolution, it really shows the change in freedom, equality, education, economy, and much more. These examples are vitals pieces of government and for a country to not have these is detrimental for the reputation of the country.
The Revolution of the 13 Colonies of America was truly revolutionary. A lot of change was brought about for the everyday lives of all kinds of the people. On document two, when talking of government and politics, the idea that government exists to help the people and that the government should get their power from the people that are affected by these laws and rules has never been considered. In all other countries at the time, including Britain, political power is instituted by blood.
The Revolutionary war was not revolutionary because it did not protect some of people’s rights, made lives harder, and left Americans in despair. The Declaration of Independence clearly stated that all men are created equal and unalienable rights (Document 2). This, however, is not shown through the social classes. The Revolutionary War was fought to bring freedom, but that undoubtedly does not show. First and foremost, Abigail Adams wrote “Remember the ladies, and be more generous and favourable to them than your ancestors.
How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Did the Revolution simply replace the old ruling elite with a new bourgeois one? What were the major effects on different groups of people, including nobles, priests, peasants, urban workers, slaves, and women? This essay will address the French Revolution and the degree to which it can be aptly described as “revolutionary.” How revolutionary was the French Revolution? Was the storming of the Bastille, the destruction of feudalism, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen of a fundamental and radical and revolutionary nature, or, alternatively, simply a series of historical events that results in the supplanting of one authoritarian regime for another and at great cost in
The American Revolution set the background for the modern nation state as well as molding the modern Army. Both countries have many differences and similarities, ranging from the individuals fighting these wars to tactics and strategies they used to win. These countries shared the same idea of freedom and independence, the difference is they used different methods of accomplishing this goal. It’s difficult to pin point which country chose the best method, but we compare some of the facts and take a deeper look as to what was transpiring in both of these Revolutions. In the 18th Century the main problem the Army had was manpower.
In that case, the American Revolution was very revolutionary because there were political, social, and economic changes. Wealthy people lost their money, there was a new government, it made citizens question slavery, and certainly more freedom for the Americans. The American Revolution resulted in the establishment of an independent nation; British colonists became American citizens. That was a vast change in U.S history.
However, resulting in a war from a dispute did not bring satisfaction to anybody. Instead, The Revolutionary War was “not revolutionary” because it did not significantly change the lives of British citizens, African Americans or women during and after the war. Others may think the Revolutionary War was revolutionary is because the government was primarily well established by the citizens. For example, in an excerpt from The American Revolution Considered as a Social Movement, it states that this was the first time that the government was powered by citizens.
Early after the Seven Years’ War Americans felt that they were apart “of a great empire.” However this sense of national pride that the Americans held would soon come to an end. After the war many assumed that the British “troops would be disbanded,” however that was not the plan of King George III. He decided to leave the troops in America, supposedly for the protection and preservation of order in the newly conquered territories. (America Past and Present, P. 108)
“What do we mean by revolution?” Wrote John Adams to Thomas Jefferson in 1815. “The war? That was no part of the Revolution; only a consequence of it. The Revolution was in the minds of the people, and was effected, from 1760 to 1775, in the course of fifteen years before a drop of blood was spilled at Lexington.” In the words of John Adams, the American Revolution was more than a war, it was an intellectual movement that transformed the mindset of a nation.
Question: In what sense was the French Revolution not all that revolutionary? Give at least one example of how its events did not bring about lasting change in France. In what way (or ways) was it truly revolutionary? Give at least one example of how it had long-lasting effects.
The French Revolution was truly revolutionary for many reasons including the creative ideas, overthrows and the new governments. In France 1789 the jail called the Bastille was stormed because the people thought that the government was going to squash the rebellion with a large army. This shows the poeple were done paying ever so increasing taxes and holding up the spending of Marie Antoinette and done supporting a government that did not support them in return. This is what started the spinning of power.
Revolution is defined by the Oxford Dictionary as "A forcible overthrow of a government or social order, in favour of a new system." (www.oxforddictionaries.com). In order to answer the question as to how revolutionary was the French Revolution, it is necessary to understand the social order it replaced. In 1789, France was a feudal society in which the power of the King was regarded as absolute.