Laidlaw Transportation, Inc. And Subsidiaries, Petitioners V. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Facts
Due to the rapid expansion, LTL acquired many companies to expand its bus transportation business and hazardous waste services business. LTI was a holding company for LTL’s U.S. businesses. And LIL is LTL’s another wholly-owned company. In order to compete with the corporate’s rivals , WMI and BFI, in purchasing U.S. companies. The accountants of the company, Coopers and Lybrand advised that LTL’s Canadian subsidiary, LIL, could form a Netherlands subsidiary to fulfill an intercompany loan strategy. This strategy was able to help the companies in Canada and U.S. deduct the interests. LTL was able to deduct interest that it paid
…show more content…
DeGroote and Haworth inquired three banks whether they were interesting in financing LII to purchase GSX with a long term investment. However, every investment bank proposed that the aquisition of GSX should not be financed solely with bank loans, equity and subordinated debt should be considered at the same time. Besides, in their proposal, the banks suggested to issue stocks to public. This proposal was rejected by both of LTL and LII since GSX’s audited financial statements was not separated. In addition, the equity contribution was not favorable for LII. Debt from LIIBV was much favorable comparing with the debt from commercial banks. As a consequence, the company decided to apply their intercompany loan strategy to acquire …show more content…
Due to the LII’s credit lines set by banks, its debt to equity ratio should not exceed 2:1, therefore, the total debt should no more than $247.8 million dollars. However, after acquiring GSX, the debt for LII was up to $491.1 million. The debt to equity ratio for LII was 3.1: 1 while its rivals’ ratio were lower than 2:1. LTI also did not comply with the loan agreements after acquiring GSX. As a result, LTI and LII had to negotiate its loan with banks again since it failed to fulfill the ratio requirements that were made by commercial banks. The principle, Haworth requested to fix the loan agreement between LIIBV and U.S. subsidiaries. He made following requests to director of LIIBV: 1) the interest rates should be set as the prime rate of ABN bank plus 2%, the maturity date was fixed; 2) Financial ratio agreements should be omitted; 3) No limitation on the loan to subsidiaries as far as the loan was available; 4) two loan accounts would be set up for LTI; 5) the changes on the amount of the loan would be recorded on a grid promissory
Facts: Rudy Stanko was driving on the Montana State Highway 200 when he was pulled over by Officer Kenneth Breidenbach, a member of the Montana Highway Patrol. Stanko had been driving his vehicle at a steady 85 miles per hour at a location that was “narrow, had no shoulders, and was broken up by an occasional frost heave.” This location also included curves and hills which obscured vision of the roadway head. The actual roadway held no other drivers at this time during the day. Stanko had been driving his new 1996 Chevrolet Camaro, with brakes, tires, and a steering wheel that were all in perfect operating conditions.
Case 442 U.S. 707 Fare v. Michael C. February 27, 1979 through June 20, 1979. This case involves Michael C., a sixteen year old juvenile, brought to the police station in California by Van Nuys police on a murder investigation. The juvenile was read his Miranda prophylactic protection rights before being questioned; he requested to speak to his probation officer but was denied. Michael agreed to speak with the officers and also waived his rights to counsel. While doing this, he brought forward incriminating statements against him that in return, the juvenile landed himself in court on a murder trial.
Thank you for providing a great example of an institution’s response to the breach of a coach’s contract. After researching the case of Kent State v. Ford, it was apparent that the terms of Ford’s agreement were not interpreted by the coach in the same manner in which the terms were written by the institution. Ford is quoted as stating that the liquidated damages clause was not enforceable (Farkas, 2015). Whereas liquated damages are defined as such: The purpose of a liquidated damages clause is to ensure that the failure of one party to follow the contract does not unfairly hurt the other and the amount agreed to must be a reasonable estimate of any potential damage a breach of contract might cause (faircontracts.org, n.d.).
The American sub-prime mortgage crisis and asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) crisis happened in Canada had huge negative impacts on the financial industry. With the bankruptcy of several major banks in North America, investors lost their faith in financial institutions and were not willing to invest their assets to those financial institutions because of extremely high risks. As a competitive player in the industry, Goodwin also faced this threat and had poor performance. Internal Analysis Strength: Goodwin was a well-diversified company with six divisions in different but related market segments.
Before taking a look at this case, think about the following questions. Do students have the same rights under the 4th amendment as adults? , What are students’ rights while being searched on school grounds?, and What guidelines do administrators and teachers need to follow as a result of New Jersey v. T.L.O? The case of New Jersey vs T.L.O involved two freshmen high schoolers who were caught using narcotics in the restroom by a teacher. The teacher took the students to the principal who then asked the students about the incident.
Case: New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) Facts: A high school freshman (T.L.O) had her purse searched by the Assistant Vice Principal at her school because a teacher found her and another student smoking in the lavatory. The Assistant Vice Principal uncovered cigarettes and marijuana. Procedural history: T.L.O. motioned to suppress the evidence because her Fourth Amendment rights were violated and was denied by the Juvenile Court stating the search was reasonable. The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court agreed there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the decision stating the search was unreasonable.
The acquisition was financed with a bridge loan of $350 million, which is now to be repaid with the issuance of mortgage and tax-exempt bonds. The newly bought energy complex was legally established as a Limited Liability Company, meaning the MESC would be a separated entity (though being fiscally integrated) and that its upcoming bonds will hence be nonrecourse to the Southern Company (through its subsidies). The MESC is thus a
The US went through revolutionary advancements in transportation from 1800 to 1840. The transportation improvements had substantial effects on the economy and also individual development. People could now buy goods that were made in places faraway because access was easier to towns and cities and people’s experiences grew as they were able to be more mobile (309). The roads were inadequate in 1800, so the federal government funded the National Road in 1808 to establish its dedication to improve the roads in the nation and so then by 1839 the East and West would be tied together (309). Commerce was still inadequate even with the National Road funded which improved transportation.
Dothard v. Rawlinson the facts in the case are listed below. Rawlinson was the plaintiff; she was a 22-year-old with some college training in correctional psychology and applied for a job as a prison counselor trainee in the state of Alabama. The current statute of Alabama required that the state correctional employees had to maintain a minimum weight of 120 pounds and to be the lowest height of 5' 2". The position of a prison counselor primary duty was to keep the security and to be able to have control over the inmates through a constant observation and supervision.
Karla Coronel Chapter 20 Problems 6) In my opinion the director is not responsible for the destroyed antiquity. For the following reasons: The agent's careless actions were not within his job. If the agent acts negligently out of his employment with the principal, the principal is not liable for damages caused by the actions of the agent.
Introduction The main objective of this particular case study is to assist Victor Dubinski, the current CEO of Blaine Kitchenware, decide whether or not repurchasing shares and changing the firm’s capital structure in favor of more debt could actually be benefit the company and its shareholders. Blaine Kitchenware is a small cap, public company who focuses on selling various different residential kitchen appliances. Up until this point, the company has only used cash and equity financing to acquire independent kitchen appliance manufacturers, and expand into foreign markets abroad. Given their excess cash and lack of debt, Blaine Kitchenware is considered to be “over-liquid and under-leveraged” (Luehrman & Heilprin, 2009).
Though having dropped from 0.65 in 2008 to 0.63 in 2009, this is still significantly higher than 0.5. This means that 63% of Gemini’s assets are financed by debt, thus the lenders bear the greatest risk. This is because Gemini financed all land, equipment and some patents with term loans. Though the Debt to Equity Ratio conveys the same information as the Debt Ratio, we see that from 2008 to 2009 this number has dramatically dropped. As opposed to using 1.87 in borrowed funds compared to each dollar provided by shareholders like in 2008, Gemini now only uses 1.71.
Their three options include a loan (sweetheart), bonds or an IPO. The firm has expressed interest in the first option (loan). This appears to be a good fit as they have decreased their long-term liabilities from previous years and if they want to expand, extra liquidity will be needed. The firm’s current line of credit is about double what it normally is and the payments on their remaining long-term debts are going to increase through the next four years with a balloon payment due in 2015 of $642,000. The increased current line of credit is due to the recently added production lines and only carries a 4% interest rate.
Most of the income of this Dutch subsidiary is then transferred to shell companies in Bermuda, Cayman Islands and Singapore which in this case is
SNC was able to increase its total firm value by $1,834,000 and its total equity value by $1,581,000, in 2012 dollars. On average, this attributed to an increase of approximately $203,778 a year in firm value. After a complete analysis of the company, SNC has proven and established itself as a trustworthy company, and it is expected that the market will reward SNC with lower risk. From 2010-2021, the equity multiplier decreased about four times from an average of 3.65 to an average of 1.10. The risks associated with taking on debt are mitigated due to SNC’s decreased leverage.