Summary of the Facts Trina Rios is the owner of Trina’s Toys, a small toy store in Bedford, Franklin. She operates a tight ship in order to compete with the big box toy stores. Ms. Rios employs kids from the local university to work in the store and often has trouble finding good employees. In order to keep costs low, Ms. Rios’ insurance policy has a high premium of $200,000, so any settlement would come out of her pocket. Karen Logan is a student at the local university where she was a member of the basketball team on an annual scholarship of $15,000. Fresh Grocers also employed her for $9.00/hour where she worked in data entry an average of 20 hours a week. Nick Patel is an employee at Trina’s Toys and works the front counter. He has the responsibility of mopping the floors after closing at night and dusting before opening in the morning. Around 10 AM the day of the accident, Mr. Patel walked the isles, including isle 3, and did not see any water puddles. Although he is supposed to walk the store every hour, he failed to do so because he was on the phone and busy with customers. On or about January 27, 2016 Ms. Long entered Trina’s Toys for the purpose …show more content…
In Owens v. Coffee Corner, the court held the owner liable for coffee that had just spilled because it was reasonably foreseeable that customers would spill coffee. Owens v. Coffee Corner (FR. CT. App. 2007). This case is differentiated by the fact that the coffee shop was in the business of selling coffee, a liquid that can be spilled on the floor causing the unsafe condition. Here, Trina’s Toys does not sell cups of water that can be spilled to cause the unsafe condition, and would therefore not e liable immediately for spills as they are not
Jan acknowledges his situation, “The whole idea of lawsuits is to settle, to compel the other side to settle” [1]. In fact, he uses this reasoning to his advantage by demanding a total of 320 million dollars from both companies. The case is drawn out and both businesses stubbornly refuse to take responsibility, Cheeseman arguing that, “These chemicals never reached Wells G and H - we will show that. And they never made anyone sick. We will show that, too” [1] while Fascher, representing Beatrice Foods, explaining that, “Unless you've proven that poisons reached the wells, there's no case” [1].
Thank you for retaining The Law Offices of Pegah Lak & Associates for you legal matters. . I have conducted some legal research to better prepare to fight this matter on your behalf. Based on my research and opinion, we have a good chance in dismissing the allegations against your airline. Below you will find the defenses that we can possibly assert by a motion.
Workers Rights During 1911, workers did not have many rights. The tragedy of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire caused 146 innocent women and children to lose their lives. The people of the public started to realize the harsh conditions that the blue collared workers of America have to deal with. They had absolutely no safety regulations or rules.
Kelly slipped on a woodchip dropped by other customers and got injured . However , the court considered the supermarket still fallen below the required standard of care . And the plaintiff won the case .Because they did not have the adequate cleaning system in their management for that area. On the opposite, for Griffin v Coles Myer Ltd in 1991 ,the plaintiff lost the case as an end .
It is first important to understand a few facts in the case. Hobby Lobby did not deny coverage of all birth control options under its insurance plan. They agreed to cover the contraception options used by the majority of the women, the contraception which prevents fertilization of the egg. Condoms, diaphragms, withdrawal, natural family planning, and hormones causing production of eggs to stop are examples of the first type of contraceptives covered by Hobby Lobby’s insurance plan.
Forrester’s injuries to her left leg and head, she has been unable to return to work since the February 26, 2014 accident involving Richard Hart. Mrs. Forrester’s lost wages are $ 74,997 and she was earning $ 100,000 annually plus medical and dental benefits when the accident occurred. Per her doctors, she is not expected to return to any type of employment for another year minimum. Mrs. Forrester was placed on FMLA for the first 12 weeks of her injury but since has been terminated from her position and has a future loss of earnings capacity claim and a loss of benefits claim that will be vigorously pursued at trial. The current estimated loss value of her earning capacity combined is $100,000.
A Civil Action is a movie based on a true story about an epic courtroom showdown where Jan Schlichtmann, a tenacious personal-injury attorney files a lawsuit against two of the nation's largest corporations. He accuses, Beatrice Foods and W. R. Grace Company for causing the deaths of children from water contamination by the illegitimate dumping of chemical wastes into natural water sources. The first issue brought up in this movie is concealing or misrepresenting of the truth also known as deceit. Deceit occurs when an individual withholds or misrepresents information by making false statements with the intent of altering another person’s position on a matter. In the movie, Jan does some personal investigations after he notices that there’s
As you all may know, Susan Jones, the manager of the pesticide department has been caught selling untested pesticides to our customers in order to reach her sales goal for the year. Mrs. Jones holds full responsibility for our company losing $50,000 as well as giving our company a dishonorable reputation by putting the untested pesticides on the market. Mrs. Jones has complete control of the pesticide department, even though employees under her went along with this scheme; she is ultimately responsible for the harm done to our customers and our company. Mrs. Jones decided to put an untested product on the shelves knowing the product was potentially harmful. Mrs. Jones claims to validate her actions by blaming the company for the unrealistic
While Mrs. Mabee carried the jugs from the front door toward the back of the house, one of the jugs shattered and spilled on her body and on the dining room floor and furniture, causing severe damage. 2 & 3 -The Product was so defective that the product was unreasonably dangerous and cause the plaintiff’s injury. It was evident the product was defective since as soon the jugs were handed over to Mrs. Mabee by the delivery driver, the jugs shattered causing injury instantly. Jeanny
The interviews for this investigation took place at the following locations: The claimant’s interview was conducted at a Taco Bell restaurant at 2950 West Orangethorpe Ave. Fullerton CA 92833. The interviews with the Human Resources Department was conducted at the Insured’s address, located at Fullerton Pacific Interiors, 1519 E. Chapman Ave. Fullerton, CA 92831.
Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.
Welcome to Zpak.com (the "Company") Web Site (the "Site"). Your access to and use of the Site is subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth in this Agreement. PLEASE READ THIS AGREEMENT CAREFULLY BEFORE ACCESSING THE SITE. BY USING THE SITE, YOU WILL BE ACKNOWLEDGING THAT YOU HAVE READ THIS AGREEMENT AND AGREED WITHOUT LIMITATION OR QUALIFICATION, TO BE LEGALLY BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT ANDTHE TERMS OF THE Zpak PRIVACY POLICY.
After reading your opinion regarding Disney catastrophe, the story of Ms. Liebeck, who was severely burned by McDonalds’ coffee, came up to my mind. Her story started in 1992 when she bought a cup of coffee from McDonalds, she stopped at McDonalds’ drivethrough window so that she can add some cream and sugar to her coffee. She put the cup her legs to remove the lid and unfortunately, she spilled the whole cup on her lap. After that, she was admitted to the hospital due to sever burns. I remember this case as it received a lot of publicity, and I remember how people were saying that this is why McDonalds put “caution handle with care I’m hot “ in their hot beverage’s cups.
‘It has been observed that a person “is entitled to be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to them” . Before the twentieth century, there was no duty of care towards people to ensure that they were not injured by one’s carelessness or neglect, unless the object was usually considered dangerous. Only in certain relationships did a Duty of Care exist, for example a Doctor-Patient relationship. A change in the Duty of Care came about in the case of MacPherson v Buick 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916). In this case, Cardozo J proposed a new approach, ‘If the nature of a thing is such that it is reasonably certain to place life and limb in peril when negligently made, it is then a thing of danger.
Toys "R" Us proves to have more than it 's popular misspelled name going for it. The company has had almost consistent success since it was founded around 1960. With the history of popular children 's toys, Toys "R" Us has been standing out amongst competition by providing the multiple kinds of toy that can attract customer from all over the world. Toys "R" Us proves that building relationships is one of the major keys to run a successful business. Its unique hiring process provides stores with exceptionally talented employees.