Occupy Space is a large, painted, canvas banner hanging in the Oakland Museum of California’s art gallery. The artist is Miguel Arzabe, a San Francisco-based artist who possesses numerous degrees including an MFA from UC Berkeley (www.miguelarzabe.net). Arzabe used an unspecified type of paint (I suspect acrylic due to the appearance of the paint and its quick drying time), ink, paper, and masking tape in the creation of this painting. Occupy Space is a piece of art that is inherently tied to the Occupy Wall Street movement of 2011 in both content and form. What initially drew me to this piece was how visually loud and attention-grabbing it is, and the refreshing quality of seeing something so rough around the edges in an art museum. It is …show more content…
The depth of field is very flat, and realistic lighting and illusionistic perspective are not the priority here. The dominant elements of this piece are shape and line. The image can be divided roughly into thirds; the left, middle, and right as I will refer to them. In the left section, there is a set of three interconnected buildings in space with collaged cutouts of spaceships and shuttles departing. Implied lines are formed by the direction that the ships are facing. Most swoop off to the right of the piece, which works with the Western tendency to want to read from left to right. The middle third shows more images of spaceships leaving the buildings. The ships are facing towards the right, and the artist has used overlapping and size differences to give the illusion that some ships are farther away than others. In the right-hand third of the image, there are a few ships heading towards the planet Jupiter, known by its distinctive red spot. The color scheme of the piece seems to be arbitrary or symbolic, with the deep blue of the background being the largest area of a single color. There are also areas of rusty browns, lime green, sky blue, gray, pink, and other small spots of color popping through in the collaged images. The most attention-grabbing feature of the piece is in the lower right-hand section. Masking tape has been applied to the …show more content…
Feminist, art historian, and activist Ariella Aronstam-Powers said that one of the purposes of art at the Occupy Oakland protests was “visually communicating critical themes, including questions of student debt, community access to social services, and corporate greed” (qtd. in Bryan-Wilson). Art can serve as an expression of why the movement exists, and what the individual artist thinks is important about the movement or their personal connection to it. Here, one of the themes that the artist is grappling with is the continual nature of inequality. Arzabe says that the story behind this piece is that it shows a scene taking place 1000 years in the future on a fictitious Mars colony; humanity is still subject to the same problems it is now, and the very rich are able to escape these problems by flying off to Jupiter in their spaceships (Oakland Museum of California). It shows the discontent that caused the Occupy movement to become a rallying cry. If this is the premise, then the buildings in the left-hand side of the painting and the images of people within them represent those who get left behind when the rich flee their
She contrasts two images to show how segregation between white people and people of color still exists. There are numerous protests ongoing in response to the events in the USA and other apparent racist incidents, making this poem pertinent to our current cultural circumstances. Additionally, millions of people use the trending hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media to express their belief that people of color face discrimination. However, the significance of this poem does not stem from the history lesson we are taught. The image of the poet having full access to the Mississippi beach in 1970 serves as a symbol of hope that things will improve and that the world will one day be a better
In chapter three of Guisela LaTorre’s book Walls of Empowerment, she discusses the problems with graffiti and mural art and compares graffiti to mural art. She also discusses the gender inequality within graffiti artists and muralists, the influences of graffiti on LA, and east coast influences on muralists in the 1980s. Finally, she concludes that although mural art gains more approval than graffiti, both art forms serve to reclaim space in which the government and society traditionally denied to disfranchised
This image is a representation of the individual as it is of two people, however this painting could be a precursor of the enlightenment
Ayn Rand manipulates the vocabulary in Anthem to express a great earnestness in the story. While establishing the setting, she describes the sky above “like a black sieve pierced by silver drops that tremble, ready to burst through” (Rand 28). This illustration of the expanse above uses both a simile and potential symbolism to represent an individual, the silver, trying to force his way out of his collectivist society, the sieve. By employing figurative language, Rand arranges a
The main color scheme of this painting is very muted and includes mainly earth tones such as grey and tan. Even his use of blue is very minimal and muted. The main building is illuminated by the sun coming from the left, outside of the scene. It shines on the central façade and the portion of the building in the background, as well as beneath the bridge. It shines the brightest where it comes through beneath the bridge and illuminates the bank of the river along with the people on it.
Have you ever wondered who painted the “Be Someone” graffiti located in front of the city of Houston? Well I have, every time that I pass by on US-59 in fact. These two simple words make me contemplate about myself as regards to who I am. The message to me provides inspiration to make something out of myself, be proud of who I am as to where I grew up, and to be able to give back to those who still live right here in the streets of Houston. The simplicity of the message makes you ponder about what you want to be in life.
Egley was able to utilize depth in order to render a work that appeared smaller as the observer’s eye moved from the foreground to background. The lines in this painting point toward one single point system as Egley created a perspective work of art by scaling the figures. Even the colors help guides the eye
Manifest Destiny involved many groups of people, but six of the main categories are the mountain men, travellers on the Oregon Trail, pioneer women, cowboys, Native Americans, and the Miners, also known as the 49ers. The mountain men were men who lived in the Rocky Mountains, and made livings as trappers who sold goods such as beavers pelts to people back East and Europe. There were over 350,000 people on the trail, and most of which were families with children. This took place mainly in the 1840s and 1860s. A subgroup of the Oregon travellers were the Pioneer women.
Reflections, shadows, and earthly objects can be portrayed in this painting as well. Although they are both telling stories about
Even the woman’s frame and posture seem to follow the lines created by the railings of the viewing box. The railings are also implied lines, the first thing our eyes go to is the woman, and then we follow the railings to the man who has his gaze set on the woman. The man’s gaze gives us implied lines that lead us back to the main focus of the painting, the woman. The artist also uses light and dark to guide our eyes to the important parts of the artwork. Most of the artwork is dark, while the woman and the man looking at her are in the light.
Behind him, another man is holding some instruments. In the background, there are waves of blue. At the left side of the painting, there are lightening bolts. At the bottom left of the painting, there is a board connecting the ground to the boats, allowing some animals to enter. Behind that, there is a person on a ladder, carrying an item on their back.
It is
The main focal point is the woman because she is right in the center of the portrait. She is also posed in a relaxed position to show more fidelity. The difference of the colors and the lines shows contrast within the
“No Trespassing.” It’s a message that we’ve all seen before, on street signs and on fences, but that most of us stopped considering as part of our daily lives. These signs just sort of blend into the background, no more noticeable than a crack in the sidewalk or a plain, solid-colored exterior wall. On the ordinary brown-painted brick backside of a bar in San Francisco’s Mission District, a bold, red No Trespassing sign is the center of a piece of thought-provoking street art. Below and to the right of the sign are some run-of-the-mill graffiti tags: pale yellow spray paint forming illegible words marking the territory of a gang or juvenile delinquent.
The Focal Point of the painting would be the three people at the table but mainly the woman and man sitting across from each other. There is no unity or variety that appears in the artwork. The artwork is in proportion. There is no movement in the picture considering the people are sitting down at the table. There is no rhythm or pattern in the artwork that is involved.