Throughout the United States history, particularly during the mid 1770s to the 1960s, tension erupted in regards to slavery between the Northern and Southern states. Both states were evolving into their own distinct society. The Northern states were rapidly expanding in successful industrial developments, foreign trade, and commerce banking. At the same time, the Southern states were swiftly expanding in agriculture, were growing dependent on the production of cotton and enslaved African Americans. Additionally, numerous western territories were being acquired and as a result the Southern states wanted to expand slavery into the western territories but the Northern states opposed the expansion of slavery creating conflict. Although, there were …show more content…
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 sparked debate in regards to the expansion of slavery into the western territories. Missouri requested statehood but wanted to come in as a slave state. Having Missouri come in, as a slave state would disrupt the equal balance between free and slave states. In an effort to regulate slavery in the western states, Jesse Thomas suggested that an amendment to be implemented into the Missouri Compromise that would ban slavery north of latitude 36°30’ in the Louisiana Purchase. This would include the Southern border of Missouri and the area west of Mississippi. Meanwhile, Maine had also applied for statehood. The Senate proposed to add Missouri as slave state and add Maine as a free state to keep the power in congress balanced out. Furthermore, issues arose because Missouri’s proposed state constitution stated that free blacks or mixed races were not …show more content…
After successfully gaining their independence Texas legalized slavery, banned free blacks and applied for statehood. The attempt of annexing Texas into the United States consequently erupted in sectional disputes between the North and South over enslavement. President John Tyler’s attempt in annexing Texas as a slave state eventually succeeded in 1845. Soon after James K. Pol gained precedency, the furious Mexican government cut off ties with the U.S. due to the annexation of Texas. A few days after cutting ties off with the U.S. Mexican troops killed eleven, eventually leading to the start of the Mexican-American War. Although not everyone agreed in declaring war, President Polk reassured Congress that he was not fighting the war to expand slavery but instead used the concept of manifest destiny to expand towards the west in hopes of instilling unity upon the nation. After a series of numerous battles that took place between March 1846 and April 1848 the end of the war lead to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. This treaty recognized that most if not all parts of present-day California, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, Wyoming, Colorado, and the border of Texas was to be under the authority of the United States. The acquisition of such a large amount of land added to the unresolved issue of slavery. The South was all for adding another slave state to U.S. as this was going to work in their
The Missouri Compromise started with the subject of slavery and how westerners could not agree whether to permit it or to exclude it. Those settling to the south wanted slavery for economic reasons such as labor while those settling to the north had no use for slavery at all. Politicians in Congress had attempted to preserve a sectional balance between the North and the South. There had been a balance of 11 slave and 11 free states but once Missouri bided for statehood the North raised alarm because slavery was well established there. The issue here was that if Missouri came in as a slave state, it would tip the political balance in the South’s favor.
It wasn’t until Maine sought statehood that Henry Clay came up with the idea as admitting Missouri as a slave state and changing Maine to a free state. The reason for the change is so that the balance between slave and free states is still evened out. Along with changing Maine the Senate wanted to split the Louisiana purchase between north and south (36°30′), having North as a free state and South as
The Missouri Compromise was necessary because the south wanted slavery to continue while the nation was growing. Most states in the North had outlawed slavery. However, the South did not want slavery to end because it was the foundation of the economy and plantations. So the Missouri Compromise was made to keep the balance of slave states and free states. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state and Maine joined as a free state.
The Southern states dependent upon slave labor, and 200 years of living with the institution had made it an integral part of Southern life and culture (Ch. 10 PowerPoint). In 1819, Maine, which had been part of Massachusetts, put in its application for statehood. Then a compromise developed (Text p. 316). Erin Rall History 113 Professor Townsend 11/14/15
The first evidence of the North's actions came in 1819 when Missouri asked to be admitted to the Union as a slave state. After months of discussion Congress passed the Missouri Compromise of 1820. This compromise was legislative measures that regulated the extension of slavery in the United States for three decades. Now the balance of 11 free states and 11 slave states was in trouble. Maine also applied for statehood in 1819, in which it was admitted as a free state.
Missouri’s seeking to become a state in 1819 was complicated by the fact that it currently had slavery. Maine also was seeking admittance to be a (free) state so the two were paired together as free and slave, balancing out the Congress. In order to prevent further conflicts over whether states would be free or slave, Senator Jesse Thomas proposed the 36°30’ parallel to ban the introduction of slave states above Missouri, known as the Missouri Compromise. The cause of the Missouri Compromise was the division of Congress as members representing free states and slave states. If the balance was overthrown, it was feared that slavery could be abolished nationally or legalized nationally by a majority of representatives of either side.
What impact did the Missouri Compromise have on future territories and their entrance to the union? To understand the Missouri Compromise fully, understanding the events that took place prior to 1820 is essential. The War of 1812 ended with “the Federalist Party all but destroyed.” After the fall of the federalist party, we entered a time period called the Era of Good Feelings. It received this name “due to the one-party dominance” . The party dominating the political elections and the U.S Congress was the Democratic-Republicans also referred to as the Jeffersonian Republicans.
In the letter to Lafayette, Thomas Jefferson describes his opinion on the question of whether to allow slavery in Missouri. Jefferson says, “...It is not a moral question, but one merely of power…,” (Document A). In other words, Thomas Jefferson understands that people only care about which section, free or slave states, has more power in government. In the map titled, “The Missouri Compromise, 1820,” it shows which states are slave states and which states are free states. According to the map, Maine entered the Union as a free state and Missouri entered the Union as a slave state, (Document B).
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed on February 2, 1848, which granted the United States half of the Mexican territory, which would extend to the Pacific Ocean. Overall, the US-Mexico War provided the United States with the
The Mexican-American War was sparked by Texas' entrance to the union as a slave state, which widened the country's unbridgeable divisions over the issue of slavery. James K. Polk, the president of the United States at that time, he officially acknowledged Texas as the 28th state of the Union by signing the annexation measure into law. The Mexican-American War was influenced by the
Missouri wanted to join the union as a slave state, but needed a way to do this that would be acceptable to the North. The government decided that Missouri could become a slave state, but only if Maine could become a free state. “At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave and free. Admission of Missouri as a slave state would upset that balance.” http://www.history.com/topics/missouri-compromise.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an attempt by Congress to ease some of the political rivalries between the North and the South (history.com 2009). The compromise stated the fact that all states up north would not have slavery and all states south would allow and continue the act of slavery (history.com 2009). It went both ways since it split the country up evenly between slave and free. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was handwritten by Henry Clay in 1820 (ancestralfindings.com 1995). On March 6th of 1820, President James Monroe signed the Missouri Compromise and made it the new law of the land (loc.gov 2017).
These attempts at compromise and keeping the Union together, while working for a time being, were not properly enforced, and they always seemed to anger one side. The Missouri Compromise was one of the first controversial compromises that encountered the issue of expanding slavery. While Henry Clay created the majority of the two-part resolution, which stated that Missouri would enter the U.S. as a slave state while Maine would enter as a free state and that “slavery was to be excluded from all new states in the Louisiana Purchase north of the southern boundary of Missouri” (U.S. History, 2008-2014), many people viewed the comprise as being extremely flawed. While the Compromise
However, a new state admitted to the Union would disturb this balance, potentially making one faction stronger than the other, causing a large scale confrontation between the pro slavery south and the anti slavery north. This is why this quickly became a heated topic.
Slavery was one of the biggest problems between 1820 and 1860. Sometimes two states had to be added to the Union at the same time, to make things fair. The North and the South fought almost constantly over the issue of slavery, sometimes things were able to be worked out about it, but as the years passed, the problems with slavery and territory started to become too big to ignore or