Each time I hear its title, Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing strikes me with a sense of anticlimax. I cannot help but wonder why one of the most brilliant writers on earth, known for his unparalleled deliberate diction, would craft a title that makes me feel as if this play is finished before I’ve read a single line? Few authors would dare proclaim, “Read my work! It’s a bunch of hubbub over absolutely zilch.” Usually, branding a product as “nothing” is not the greatest marketing strategy. I would suggest that Shakespeare, ever the masterful strategist, is using this title to draw attention to the chaos of the “much ado,” which is ultimately born from his characters ' liberal use of deceit. If the plot begins and ends with “nothing", then we must depend entirely upon the “much ado” created by deceit in the middle, to discover the meaning in this play. In my reading of Much Ado About Nothing, I identify three types of deception: deception of others for benevolent reasons, deception of others for malicious reasons, and self-deception. Of the three, I argue that the last is the most dangerous. But first, I will present examples of each and explore …show more content…
Don John, the villainous half-brother of Don Pedro, provides the perfect example of this when he hatches a plot to “misuse the Prince, to vex Claudio, to undo Hero, and to kill Leonato” (2.2.27-28). He does so, driven by jealous discontent and the vow to “make all use of it,” (1.3.36). At first it appears that his slander of Hero has ruined everyone’s plans and left the girl so “death is the fairest cover for her shame” (4.1.114). Yet the pattern of the play suggests that this kind of deception is ultimately fruitless; all of the characters who engage in it are found out, quickly caught, or foiled in their attempts to escape the consequences. Thus, it could even be argued that this sort of deception only hurts those who perpetrate it, in the
Gossip is the main driver of the various plotlines in Shakespeare’s Much Ado about Nothing. The conflict in the play is shaped entirely around false rumor spread by characters and the hearsay that accompanies it. The characters’ actions are enormously affected by the conversations they overhear and their willingness to believe secondhand information over direct experience. Patricia Meyer Spacks states in her novel Gossip, that rumor in the play “creates its own territory using materials from the world at large to construct a new oral artifact” (Spacks, 1985, Location No. 315).
The audience may understand the concept of love and romance flowing within the characters because it was to portrayed that way but the critics would argue the fact that some of the characters like Beatrice and Benedick were made to fall in love with each other through deception. As simple as the characters were, the situations arousing in the play became more complexed as scenes passed by. What led to the trouble and chaos in the play also led to the solution in the end, when Claudio and Don Pedro were deceived into thinking by Don John that Hero was unfaithful. That very same idea also solved the problem in the end when Leonato, Hero’s father, deceived Claudio by making him believe that she is dead and that it is his duty to clear Hero’s name by reading out on her tomb and marrying the said niece who looks just like Hero. Again the plotting against own is present where the said niece turns out to be Hero and she comes back to life again.
Throughout Much Ado About Nothing, William Shakespeare develops the theme of deception through Beatrice and Benedick, who change their points of view on how life should be lived as a result of their experiences. The first encounter that we witness between Beatrice and Benedick has them
Human nature causes them to trick or deceive others for their own individual benefits leading them to ruin others’ lives. The two texts, William Shakespeare's play, 'Much Ado About Nothing' and Mark Water's film, 'Mean Girls', although set in distinct time periods, explore the concept of trickery and deceit. Both texts illustrate that all deception comes with a consequence and infidelity and deception can also have an impact on yours and others reputation and noting can be used to deceit others. Even though, both texts feature different setting and storyline, they still share some similarities and differences. Both in ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ and ‘Mean Girls’, the antagonists are faced with a terrible consequence for their use of trickery
The movie version wasn’t all that long. They took a bunch of lines out of the play so they play would be shorter and not as long and it wouldn’t make people not want to watch the anymore. They tried to put the most important lines that were written on their script into the movie. So as time went on I think people got tired of the same old movie version of Much Ado About Nothing.
Film director Sir Peter Hall once said in an interview that “...Shakespeare's text is essentially theatrical and it's dependent on an imaginative make-believe between the audience and the actor” (Shakespeare in the Cinema). Shakespeare’s work has been adapted to film countless times in the last century, as they have been reproduced on the stage since the sixteenth century. The argument over which was better has been present since his work transitioned from stage to screen. Much Ado about Nothing is an excellent example of this, specifically in comparison of the 1993 film edition and the 2011 stage play at the Wydham Theatre in London. Both Kenneth Branagh and Josie Rourke did an excellent job with their directing choices in both, yet neither
Within the play, Much Ado About Nothing, there is a central theme of deceitfulness, as a way to solve a problem or an issue amongst the characters. Though this deception may be evil, it can often lead to positive endings after several conflicts. In the creation of this theme, Shakespeare uses both negative and positive examples to contribute to his lesson on ruses. Within this particular scene, all of the cons the various characters have put on are officially revealed to each other. This scene highlights that deception is not always evil, nor is it always moral, but is always solved.
Hero express that you must manipulate someone's love life no matter the consequences when she explains, “some cupids kill with arrows, some with traps” (3.2.112). You must use trickery, to reveal their true feelings for the other person. In Much Ado About Nothing trickery and deception are central themes in the play. At least, every character in this play have been a victim of trickery or deception. This comes to show that manipulation can reveal the true feelings and thoughts about one another.
Written, Produced, Published Shakespeare wrote Much Ado About Nothing in 1598 Much Ado About Nothing was produced in 1600 The play was included in the First Folio, published in 1623. Setting and Events The setting for Much Ado About Nothing takes place in Messina, Italy, and the battle that Don Pedro, Claudio, and Benedick return from seems to be the Battle of Lepanto.
John Ruskin once said, “It is better to lose your pride with someone you love than to lose that someone you love with your useless pride.” Similarly, in Much Ado About Nothing, Shakespeare also suggests that the biggest barrier between romantic love is pride. He asserts, this by telling the readers that love is a far more authentic feeling than pride, and that love can only grow if an individual is able to set aside their pride and allow themselves to be both vulnerable and receptive to authentic feelings. The first thing that is emphasized in the play, Much Ado About Nothing is the vulnerability and dangers of love. It’s shown that falling in love is a constant danger, and that no one gets out of the ordeal unharmed.
In focusing on the characters of Beatrice and Benedict, their relationship serves as the ultimate example of the fusion of war and social culture as both engage in a variety of conflicts throughout the play that influence their human nature. Often called a “merry way,” the relationship of Benedict and Beatrice in “Much Ado About Nothing” displays key social and militaristic culture influences the characters human nature (William
While Shakespeare uses rhetoric to create art, Iago uses it to cause destruction and pain. Shakespeare’s Othello can be used as a means of exploring the dangerous power of rhetoric and gaining insight into the ethical role it
Bradley’s wrong interpretation of text was due to the lack of understanding of words on text, which happened due to him being sentimental, and that’s the reason he excessively ‘misdirected’ (p.136) the quality of moral integrity in Othello. Leavis disagree with the Othello being centre of the play “Othello”.
Introduction This assignment aims to investigate the meaning changes of words and the changes of vowels between the Elizabethan and the modern English language. For this intention I have chosen to analyze ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ (1599). The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the language used by William Shakespeare with the particular words which disappeared or went through meaning changes during the past centuries and to introduce one of the main characters, Beatrice as an early feminist heroine.
I carried on through classes that day with a grim determination. In History, the teacher had to call my name thrice before I heard and answered her question. At break, Winnifred and Denise marched up to me. "Where were you this morning?" Winnifred asked, irritated. "