Rhetorical Analysis of Word Wars A strategic narrative is a story that a nation must tell itself, and the world, to wage a war or to maintain a competitive advantage in the international system (Free Speech). The mass impact of technology has captivated this idea and has used it to express the freedom of speech in ways that has never been done before, but also "[pushes] these limits past common decency" (Wickman 27). Two authors debate with this international problem in different styles, but share some of the same concepts and common fallacies on this issue. Lindsay Wickman writes about the formal and informal use of how technology over the years has shaped our government and our overall system of actions to how we adapt to it. Susan Benesch writes about the permissibility
Britto, 2012). Companies do not allow content that would make them less preferred. They also try to ensure that their users follow their national laws. Regarding the government to ban or restrict the use of social media platform in their countries (Ceron, & Memoli, 2016). The social media platform has also limited in other ways in several other nations.
Utopian ideals of the Web began to emerge in the inception of the Internet and World Wide Web. Individuals who thought quite optimistically of the Internet’s development saw its spread as a positive evolution of not only technology but also society. They see the internet as being limitless and uncontrolled, changing commerce and society. Individuals will behave differently with easy access to the Internet, but this will benefit society since they will be able to easily find like-minded people in virtual communities. Proponents of this online utopia idealize that the Internet will have the power to bring people together and change society for the better.
These three important rules work together to prevent information from being withheld from consumers and to keep the internet equal for all of its users. Mr. Wheeler, the former chairman of the FCC, made it so the internet service providers are regulated like utilities (Messina). However, large companies and ISPs, Internet Service Providers, have debated
However, “We are now in an age of information and know how important information is for our daily life. However, less known is the importance of information for nation-state building” (Yongnian, 2012). Although Internet censorship prevents and hinders freedom of expression, it is an absolute necessity in China. “China’s Internet censorship has obvious protectionist effects” (Liu, 2011). It is a tool that the Chinese government employs to regulate information flow within the country as she opens her doors to the World.
The internet is also currently the world’s largest and fastest growing public forum, a place to hear and to be heard. Any communication made in a public forum is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution, which forbids Congress from “abridging the freedom of speech.†However, the Supreme Court has declared, in cases such as Miller v. California and Dennis v. United States, that certain forms of speech, such as obscenities and overt threats, are not protected by the “free-speech†umbrella and are thus not legal. Certainly the same rules apply to the internet. So should the government monitor the internet for these abuses? While the most immediate answer would be “no,†I am not sure it is the correct one.
The express path would be utilized by large media and internet companies, and upper-class households. The author states, "Some small business owners have also been concerned these issues will affect them, worrying that industry giants could pay to get an edge, and leave them on an unfair playing field." This is true especially for those who can't afford it would experience slow or no service. Keeping net neutrality can be beneficial to consumers despite the internet providers benefiting from it. They would enjoy the power of controlling how consumers use their product and block websites they don't like.
Climate change is denied is due to the prioritization of business and the economy. Large corporations create their products with uncostly materials, in order to profit more, and those materials are more-often-than-not non-renewable resources or cause damage to the Earth. These corporations prefer to not be targeted with accusations of the unethical damage they are causing. Therefore, they create propaganda against climate change, they create doubt among their customers. It is considered a business tactic to create news surrounding issues, in order to distract the consumers from whatever controversial issue that is, or could be, affecting their sales.
In this case, signers of a petition for rights for same-sex couples feared that having their names and addresses on a petition would open them up to death threats and other risks. In addition to the physical danger, this would browbeat potential signers into forgoing their efforts (John Doe #1, et al., v. Reed). This need for anonymity is even more critical to the nature of the Internet. In fact, in one example brought by the ACLU, the court ruling upheld the belief that "[T]he free exchange of ideas on the Internet is driven in large part by the ability of Internet users to communicate anonymously"
It's because people who are most hooked up to the internet are the students. But agree or not, advancement in technology made our life easier especially with the internet. Accessing information and connection among people is also made easier with the help of internet. In short, the internet can help us in a variety of things. We all know that nowadays, people, especially teenagers are excessively engaging in the use of the internet.