Were you ever wondering where the phrase “no taxation without representation” came from? I know you were. Well, to shed some light on the subject, the well-known catch phrase came from the colonists when they “objected to the Tea Act because they believed that it violated their rights as Englishmen to ‘no taxation without representation’, that is, to be taxed only their own elected representatives and not by a British parliament in which they were not represented” (Wikipedia). These colonists were upset over British taxation and rule in the colonies, especially when Parliament would pass acts that unfairly benefitted the British and not the colonists. The Boston Tea Party was a political protest of resistance towards Great Britain’s taxes and …show more content…
The Tea Act caused huge amount of resistance in the colonies that eventually led to what we now know as the Boston Tea Party. The East India Company was planning on distributing the tea to shopkeepers in the colonies, avoiding any direct trade with American merchants who wanted to sell to the shopkeepers. This was causing many problems for Radical Patriots and merchants who were losing out on profits by the British authority. The Tea Act could have been considered an early attempt on a British monopoly of tea as stated by British general Frederick Haldimand of New York. The Tea Act and its policies “has introduced the mercantile part of the Inhabitants to be very industrious in opposing this Step and added Strength to a Spirit of Independence already too prevalent” (Chapter 7, pp. 156). To sum up that statement, the British general was aware that the mercantilists of the colonies were growing impatient and angry with British rule, especially with the passing of previous acts such as the Townshend, Stamp, and now this Tea …show more content…
All these social, political, and economical problems ended up being some of the key components that led to the American Revolution and America’s Declaration of Independence. Even after the Boston Tea Party, conflicts between Great Britain and the colonies continued to escalate in forms of naval blockades, economic warfare, political resistance, and even armed resistance and warfare. American liberty was being constantly attacked by Great Britain and they were getting tired of being pushed around. In 1775 for example, there were British attacks on colonists near Boston and in Lexington and Concord that led to armed resistance by the Patriots. They had to fight for what was right, and what was right was fighting for American freedom from an oppressive government. Eventually, the Patriot leaders wanted to meet to discuss going to war with Britain to gain independence. Further attacks in the South in Virginia and North Carolina led to armed forces within in the colonies to join to fight against the evil royal monarchy. A continental army was created and led by George Washington and to top it all off, Independence was declared by the Patriots in
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The Tea Act of 1773 reinstated the issue of Britain’s right to tax the colonies. The Parliament and the colonies disagreed on a system of government in which the colonies would share the same rights and control as Parliament over their colonial affairs. Between 1773 and 1776, enormous amounts of tension between the center and the peripheries regarding the right to control the colonies led to the disintegration of the empire. The colonies and Parliament continued their dispute about the supremacy of the colonies that began with the Stamp Act of 1765.
The Tea Act of was one among many measures required on the American settlers by the energetically obligated British government inside of the ten years paving the way to the American Revolutionary War. The demonstration's way of thinking/basic truth/rule reason for existing wasn't to lift income from the areas of a country however to save the fumbling (group of islands) Company, a key performer inside of the British (process of people making, selling, and buying things). English people government agreed the (related to big business) an (impressive/forcing (on people)/causing an inconvenient situation) business model on the importation and offer of tea inside of the areas of a country. The travelers (to holy places) had never admitted/recognized/responded
The colonists abruptly became enraged by these acts passed by Parliament. This was exhibited through how they referred to the acts. While Britain regarded these as the “Coercive Acts”, meaning they enforced stricter laws on the colonists so they obeyed the rules, the colonists referred to them as the “Intolerable Acts”, meaning these acts should not be enforced or allowed. These acts provided consequences for the Boston Tea Party, allowed for convicted British soldiers to be tried in biased ways, excluded numerous colonies from their own claimed territory, alarmed Protestants, and threatened the prospect of “self-government.” Specifically the Massachusetts Government Act and the Quebec Act prompted them to propose they did not hold as much
The British implemented many taxes on the American colonies, most of them, however, did not sit well with the colonist. These acts included the Stamp Act, Townshend Act, Tea Act, etc. The Townshend Act, one of the most notable tax acts passed by the British, intended to place taxes in common good such as glass and paper. These acts led to many conflicts like the Boston Massacre that is a result of the Townshend Act. The Boston Tea Party was also a result of the Tea Act and “No Taxation without Representation”.
After the French and Indian War, Great Britain went into serious debt. Great Britain’s debt caused them to tighten their control over colonial America. One way that Great Britain tightened their control over the colonies was by enacting many taxes. The colonists met these acts with much resistance, and protests. This went to show that the main cause of the revolution was tighter British control for the colonists.
The Double Standard For Freedom The colonists accepted British authority for many decades, however in the mid to late 1700’s the colonists had a blossoming divergent identity and felt the British were infringing on it. This began with the Molasses Act and continued to build through the Stamp Act, the Tea Act, and then finally the Intolerable Acts. For many decades, the colonists were effectively autonomous, remaining under the British rule but behaving mostly independently. However, after the Seven Years War, Britain began to overreach by imposing revenue taxes on things like tea.
On May 10, 1773, Parliament passed the Tea Act, the primary objective of which was to save the British East India Company from bankruptcy. It also eliminated all tea tax except the three pence Townshend tax. A third goal of the Tea Act was to offer Americans tea at a lower price than that of the colonial smugglers . However what happened was the average American colonist became angry with this latest act in a long line of unpopular policies, laws, and taxes imposed on him by Britain .
The “point of no return” for the American Revolution to occur, the event that sparked the beginnings of the American Revolution, was The Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party was one of the last biggest protests against England’s “Intolerable Acts”, as the colonists liked to call them. Neither the colonies nor did Britain really want to seperate, but the situation they were in caused them to. England was being very controlling over the colonies because they were of great economical benefit to them. The colonies were reluctant to even consider separation because all they really wanted was their rights.
and they too were attacked so they had to fire into the mob. Parliament passed the Tea Act, which gave the British East Indians company a complete monopoly of the American tea business meaning the colonists could only buy tea from this company. The colonists opposed this law even though it lowered the price of tea. They viewed the tea Act as merely another example
he American Revolution was a very important event in the course of our history. One of the conflicts between the British and the Colonists took place during the year of 1773, when colonists protested the use of tariffs on tea placed by the British. This protest was one of the main reasons why the American Revolution was fought. The Boston Tea Party was significant to the American independence, because this was one of the many protests of British rule over the colonies. This finally led to a war which in the end granted the colonies their independence.
The different acts that were passed to collect taxes angered the colonists little by little until they finally exploded. The Boston Tea Party was a type of protest against one of those taxes. Colonist chose to waste the tea instead of buying it. The colonists were forced to revolt against Britain by all the injustices they made, like the Boston Massacre. British soldiers were not able to hold back their anger and shot 5 people.
The American Revolution in 1776 was ultimately the birth of a new nation that would become a major influence in the world. Several factors combined to create an atmosphere conducive for revolution. First, the colonists felt that England restricted their trade and waterways. Second, the colonists were burdened by over-taxation. The colonists further felt these taxes were imposed without fair representation in Parliament.
They collectively boycotted British made goods and protested the Kings’ Acts. King George had been monitoring the rising rebellion over the years. Trying to avoid setting off a full blown rebellion he lowered the taxes, but still refused to completely eradicate them. He refused to give the colonists representation in the Parliament as well, taking away any chance they could stand up and protect themselves from the government. The colonists were enraged with the British government; “No taxation without representation!”
The Constitution—the foundation of the American government—has been quintessential for the lives of the American people for over 200 years. Without this document America today would not have basic human rights, such as those stated in the Bill of Rights, which includes freedom of speech and religion. To some, the Constitution was an embodiment of the American Revolution, yet others believe that it was a betrayal of the Revolution. I personally believe that the Constitution did betray the Revolution because it did not live up to the ideals of the Revolution, and the views of the Anti-Federalists most closely embodied the “Spirit of ‘76.” During the midst of the American Revolution, authors and politicians of important documents, pamphlets, and slogans spread the basis for Revolutionary ideals and defined what is known as the “Spirit of ‘76”.
Accounts of civil disobediences have made their way into the paper many times since the start of this country: the Boston Tea Party, Thoreau's refusal to pay a poll tax, and Rosa Park's decision to stay seated on the bus. All of these examples represent a time of distress when people responded in non-violence to prove a point. But many would ask if this is really proving a point or if it is simply disregarding the law and setting a bad example? Well let me ask you this: would it be better to sit back and to hope that someone will speak out about the problem, or to go forward in violence thinking that that is the only way to achieve something? It seems that an act of non-violence is a way of being heard without coming across as irrational or