Ethics, the moral principles that guide one's compass, is a crucial topic throughout history and more so in today's technological world. As our studies are centered around this, the author will discuss the ethical implications in his profession, nondestructive testing or simply NDT. In this essay, the author will discuss what NDT is, why ethics are an integral part of this profession and the implications a breach of ethics may have. Nondestructive testing, NDT, is the testing and analysis of materials, components, and systems to ensure mechanical and material quality is met without the need for damaging the item. Technology that is used to accomplish this includes x-ray producing equipment, magnetic inducing, electrical conducting equipment, …show more content…
An example of corporate responsibility involves falsifying information by FirstEnergy's Davis-Besse Power Plant personnel , revealing serious infractions and a cover up. Inspections revealed several cracks and defects in critical components. This incident resulted in FirstEnergy being “fined $5.45 million dollars, the largest single fine imposed by the NRC [U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission]. They would eventually pay $33.5 million in fines.” This also resulted in two employees being “fired by FirstEnergy Corporations... They would be the only two convicted of deception charges.” Further, “Geisen [supervisor/co-defendant] would be sentenced to three years of probation with 200 hours of community service and a fine of $7,500. Siemaszko [engineer] would eventually receive three years of probation and a fine of $4,500.” (Nisbet, 2009) Another example to the ramifications of dishonesty in NDT occurred in a court case regarding a shipyard inspector lying about weld inspection certifications on U.S. Navy assets. During the defendant's, Robert Ruks, career at the shipyard, he had certified more than 10,000 welds, some of which where critical to submarine safety. As sentenced for his actions, the inspector was “sentenced to 3 years prison and ordered to pay $654,000 compensation …show more content…
As discussed, NDT is a critical service in today's world, not only by protecting, but by ensuring quality and safety standards. Ethical behavior, as shown, is priority in this profession and can have serious repercussions if not observed. Life and safety is nondestructive testing's number one
$A$ is a set of conditions $C_{i,L_j},{i,j}inmathbb{N}$ at the same hierarchical level $L_j$. Only one condition $Cin A$ can be extit{true} at the same time and no state transition without being specified by a condition is possible. If condition $C_{i,L_j}$ is not extit{true} any more (due to the proceeding of the assembly operation), there is a fallback to state $S_{j,L_i}$ and all conditions are evaluated to determine the current substate. An exemplary decomposition tree containing different hierarchical levels, multiple states per level and conditions for state transition is given by Fig.~
et us assume that $A_{ij}$ is the power received (expressed in dBm)by the frequency band $F_{i}$ at the time $T_{j}$. We have represented the data collected during our spectrum measurement by using a N $ imes$ M matrix designed by L. The matrix L is defined as: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% [ L = [A(F_i,T_j)]= egin{bmatrix}
In the case of Adelphia, the individuals found guilty in this case neglected their duties as managers and their duties to the SHAREHOLDERS. With the positions as Chairman of the board of directors, President, and Vice President, they all had "fiduciary duties to both the corporation and its shareholders" Beatty & Samuelson (2016). The SEC's suit against them for multiple frauds on different counts, did not protect them from the BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE based on the fact that they weren't acting in good faith by putting the company in debt and manipulating statements to conceal the
\section{Building Blocks} \subsection{Access Structures} \textbf{Definition 3.8.}(Access Structure\citeup{beimel1996secure}) \emph{Let $\{P_1, P_2,...,P_n\}$ be a set of parties. A collection $\mathbb{A}\subseteq 2^{\{P_1,P_2,...,P_n\}}$ is monotone if $B\in\mathbb{A}$ and $B\subseteq C$ implies $C\in\mathbb{A}$. An access structure is a monotone collection $\mathbb{A}$ of non-empty subsets of $\{P_1,P_2,...,P_n\}$, i.e., $\mathbb{A}\subseteq 2^{\{P_1,P_2,...,P_n\}} \setminus\{\emptyset\}$. The sets in $\mathbb{A}$ are called the authorized sets, and the sets not in $\mathbb{A}$ are called the unauthorized sets}. In our settings, attributes will play the role of the parties such that the access structure $\mathbb{A}$ will contain the authorized
1. Summary: I find SFC Picart, Gregory liable for the loss of property valued at $78,415.72. The property identified in the DD 200 is no longer accountable, as a result of SFC Picart’s failure to maintain positive control of government equipment. Therefore, I assess his actions as simple negligence, as senior NCO (i.e. previous hand receipt holder) demonstrated by his blatant disregard of the Army CSPD property accountability protocols/measures. As such accountability documentation (sub hand receipts), improper custodial transfer of equipment and failure to conduct routine inventories has directly attributed to the loss of the aforementioned government property. 2.
1. Are you happy with what you produced on this assessment? Explain why you are or are not. I am not happy with my current test grade because it doesn't reflect the amount of work I put into reviewing for this test. I’ve put more reviewing time for this math assessment than any other math test I’ve ever taken.
Analysis: On December 10, 2001, respondent Mark James Knights was sentenced at a California Court to probation following a drug offence (Oyez, n.d.). Agreeing to the terms of probation, Knights was released. Three days following Knights being placed on probation, a Pacific Gas & Electric power transformer and neighboring Pacific Bell
The deputy attorney general, Sally Q. Yates, recently addressed a need to hold white collar criminals responsible for their crimes. She has stepped up the rhetoric against corporate executives who commit crimes by demanding that prosecutors punish individuals instead of just the corporation. If history is any lesson on the matter, her rhetoric will remain just rhetoric. An Ongoing Problem The problem with the current financial regulations is that it does stop corporations from committing fraud.
Ever since the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment and other similar experiments that include human subjects, the issues on patient privacy and informed consent were the central issues, which led to the three basic ethical principles as outlined in the Belmont Report. According to the report, the principles of respect of person, beneficence, and justice are the general judgement we apply as justification for ethical prescriptions and evaluations of human actions.1 Therefore, all students, researches, or healthcare professionals have to abide by these principles even though it is a difficult issue within healthcare informatics. The issue of confidentiality is very problematic indeed, especially when it relates to race/ethnicity.
- Safety provi¬sions are interpreted to protect patients from illnesses caused in the course of medical treatment as well as to provide hygienic and injury-free experience in the health care setting. Special provisions exist for safety in pharmaceuticals, blood supply, infectious disease treatment and diagnostics, and mental health services, among others. Ethical codes for doctors, nurses, and other health care workers contain provisions applicable to the patients’ right to safety. Medical errors and other actions that fail to meet safety standards can carry civil, criminal and administrative penalties
It is the responsibility of IRBs to consider the ethical circumstances of each proposed experiment. There are issues concerning abstract values which can be unique to individual IRBs. There is difficulty in establishing unity among IRBs for guidelines regarding which experiments are ethical and
He appears to have put profits ahead of mine safety and health in violation of Federal mine standards. Mr. Blankenship could go to prison for 31 years. (See NBC News) CEO Stewart Parnell of Peanut Corporation of America was sentenced to 28 years in prison in connection with a 2008 salmonella outbreak that killed nine people and sickened 714 others across the U.S. Bernard Madoff is serving 150 years jail time for engaging in a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme that claimed many celebrity victims. Even former Fed chairman Ben Bernanke had some reservations about prosecutions for the 2008 Great Recession. Individuals were responsible for that debacle not abstract firms.
The contaminated water supply then resulted in the death of little children, and parents had to bury their own children. Therefore, there is no reason not to have prosecuted the two corporations as all the elements of negligence are displayed here. Consequently, both corporations whether it was intentional or accidental, committed an act of negligence. Although nothing can be done to undo the losses, both companies must have apologized and compensated the damages
This proves that throughout the case, Cendant Corporation wasn’t acting fully ethical nor with the desired fiduciary actions to their investors and the auditing team in this case being Ernst&Young. Aside from the trust being broken apart between both, there was never a sign of an internal control inside Cedant. Therefore, there shows that the corporate governance for Cendant Corporation didn’t have signs of existence as well. Most frauds that were occurring before the implementation of the SOX-2002, had top management such as in Cendant that didn’t have care for the ethical performances as much as in today’s corporate world with more regulations in hand by the government. At the end, Cendant had filings against them concerning their corporate governance
Kenneth Lay, Mr. Jeffrey Skilling and the company CFO, Mr. Andrew Fastow .The management level of Enron Corporation had misconduct the code of ethics and fail to performing the duties of a corporation which is telling the truth of the situation of a corporation .Instead , they tried try to hide the truth of their financial status and create a false prosperity situation and make the public believe on them in order to support their shares prices . The misconduct of code of ethics by the management level by Enron corporation has led to the another question – The ultimate responsibility of a corporation towards society ? The ultimate responsibility of a corporation is to gain profit or become a stable economic unit ?