Persuasive Essay On Right To Bear Arms

The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.

How are anti-gun taxes helping lower gun violence. More than 200 years ago in 1791, the founders of the United States wrote, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, must not be violated." This is the Second Amendment, stating that American citizens have the right to self-protection and safety. People should be able to carry firearms because you have the right to defend your life, and guns help with that. The founding fathers understood that having to defend yourself was necessary as a free society.

They have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and Gun Control is complicated. Considering the rights and liberties of a citizen against the welfare and safety of the public has always been an insecure balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these intense issues that have both sides, Democrats, and Republicans, firmly established in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms rely on the fact that the supply for such rights is treasured in their constitution.

Even if it were to be illegal to own firearms, corrupt people will find a way to obtain one. Every law abiding citizen should have the right to bear arms. Background The second amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment was passed by congress on September 25, 1789, and was ratified on December 15, 1791. Modern debates focus on whether or not the amendment focuses on protecting a private right for individuals to own firearms, or if it focuses on a right only available to militia organizations (Amendment II right to bear arms, n.d.).

The Second Amendment protects the right of people to keep and bear arms. This amendment was a controversial among different people in the government. It was between letting the people keep their weapons or to not let the people keep their weapons. This amendment was important to the framers of the Constitution because it provided the country with a well-regulated militia. The Second Amendment states "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

A Yale Law Journal author wrote an academic article on this issue. They discuss how the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions led to them saying that, “the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms and incorporated that right against the state 's, courts and scholars have struggled to determine the reach of those opinions.” The court held that the Amendment did not bestow a new privilege, but a pre-existing right. As I believe, they confirmed that preserving the militia was key to the right’s codification. They also believe that self-defense was the central component of the right itself. Public opinion is in my favor on this subject.

When stated throughout this essay, the statement “right to bear arms” can be widely interpreted into a large number of ideas. The topic is widely debated with one side believing it is the right to own a gun for self-defense, and the other believing it is for a standing militia. The ruling of the courts is in favor of the belief that guns should be owned for Self-defense. This belief is the reason why in 2008, the Supreme Court justice ruled that “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with

Furthermore, they oppose concealed weapons in public spaces and want to ban assault weapons. They hope that by banning assault weapons that the number of mass shootings that occur across the US every year will be reduced. In contrast, Republicans oppose stricter gun control and support the right to own and use guns. The party are strong supporters of upholding the Second Amendment which is the right to bear arms. They believe it is a constitutional right to own a gun and have the opinion that Government regulation over firearms is unconstitutional.

The right to own guns has many benefits even for those who do not own guns. The right to own guns is based in the United States Constitution. According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Safety for College Students must be the biggest concern, and my Opinion is definitely keep guns out of the classrooms. Donald Trump has a lot of work to do to make sure that College Students are safe with the new gun law. I believe in Civil Rights for Americans, and our Second Amendment, but safety must be the biggest factor when dealing with the Gun Control Issues. Hillary Clinton disagreed with Donald Trump, because\ she felt that there needs to be more done on Gun Control, and Donald Trump believed in the second amendment to Bear Arms, and both parties had good issues when they were debating on this issue, and I felt that they both believed that it should be a state issue. Today, Americans feel that our Second Amendment is our Civil Rights, and protected Our Constitution Rights, and we must all be concerned by safety first.