Then there are the people that want to put a restriction on the amount of some guns sold. (LaFollette) Gun control is a very debated topic because of the recent shootings. But, what the people need to realize is that it wasn’t the guns walking around killing people, there have to be people behind these guns. We need to control our people before we take it out on the guns. Owning a firearm is a big responsibility and we need to keep that responsibility in the hands of the people that can handle it.
The United States should not add stricter gun laws because Guns are used to protect people,guns are used for hunting,and the guns are not the problem the people using them are the problem. If guns were in the right hands then there would be no reason to ban them. The United States should not add stricter gun laws because gun are used to protect other people. People use guns to protect themselves from bad people trying to kill them. As an example, someone walks into someones house and tries to kill that person, if there are stricter gun laws then you might not be able to shoot back at them.
Also, when Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association said," That the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun ' ' (Smith). This perfectly sums up many beliefs on gun control. The beliefe that we must allow our law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their family by letting them have a gun, not restricting them from getting
There just might be an opportunity to solve the problem of mass murders caused by disturbed individuals with guns. If we can get the politicians to stop talking long enough to listen. They may realize they are both wrong on the issue of gun control. Note how carefully I chose my words there. Guns do not kill people.
Gun’s need to be handled carefully Gun owners need background checks. When a gun is handled, it should be handled carefully as it can cause destruction. Gun owners, need background checks as to make sure they aren’t mentally ill or have done bad deeds in the past. A events happened where a gun was stored in a book bag and it was shot on accident inflicting damage to a nearby student, this could have been avoided. In owning a gun many are check for background information, but these protocols are not as good they need to be strengthen.Guns need to be handled carefully or it could very well cause a disaster, and checks need to be stronger to make sure guns do not fall into the wrong hands.
The next mass shooting occurs, and the whole cycle is repeated. II) Establish the controversy: The public debate is not productive because it is developed around various degrees of gun control and restricted access, which are open to different interpretations, implementations, and enforcements. This approach does explain the issue fully, and is not likely to prevent future incidents of gun violence. III) Credibility: Moreover, the credibility of the public debate is soon questioned. Instead of focusing on access to firearms of private persons, the debate is highly affected by various issues that are not related to this core problem.
This is a persuasive essay on the subject of gun control and whether citizens should be able to carry guns in public. It is discussed that guns should be permitted because previous incidents where people did not have protection against other members of society led to numerous fatalities. Guns would benefit society on the basis of self defense. It is also discussed of the ways to help regulate gun control such as background checks and other actions that could be taken. The cost of gun violence is soaring and a way to monitor that is to adapt better gun laws for citizens Law enforcement is there to protect us but sometimes things need to be handled instantly and having to wait on them can present a bigger problem.
The enforcement of stricter gun control laws would be extremely beneficial for the safety of the people in the United States. Stricter gun control laws would ensure guns do not fall in the hands of people who would misuse them. For example, individuals who are 21-years-old and below should not have the right to own or be around guns. For if they cannot legally drink alcohol, how can the authorities trust them with a weapon that can easily take a life within seconds. Furthermore, stricter gun control laws could make sure that people go through a proper psyche evaluation before they can obtain the right to own a gun.
What does gun control actually control? People should use guns properly; it’s a privilege to be able to own a gun. Getting to hunt and shoot guns are something Americans shouldn’t take for granted. Much of the evidence law enforcement agencies have reinforces evidence that stricter gun laws can be part of the solution. Stricter laws can be enforced, but America has to make sure everyone abides by the laws.
“You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you do not enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It 's not the law-abiding citizens. It 's not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). Gun control laws are made to keep people safe, but that does not necessarily mean that they are one-hundred percent effective.