Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime

Gun Control 1) Donald Trump, the president of the United States, is very positive when it comes to gun rights. He argues against the limitation of guns. He believes that limiting the publics access to firearms makes them more and not less vulnerable to gun violence. Donald Trump believes that making gun reforms are a bad way of solving the problem.

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

ABSTRACT Weapons of mass destruction (WMD) including chemical, nuclear, biological and radioactive weapons along with anti – personnel landmines have the potential of causing mass destruction as well as killing human beings. Starting from the World War II the use of such warfare weapons have been quite prevalent and ever increasing, reaching a stage of convenient arm flows today. A major impact of the usage of such weapons is that they pose an unprecedented collection of challenges to peace and security of the nations which thus brings into picture the International Humanitarian Laws to protect the lives of humans, environment, property and even moral credibility and harmony worldwide. Arms Trade Treaty is one such effort by UN to regulate

Gun control in America is a big concern and has been a political concern. The debate concerning gun control has been about the right to bear arms and the laws and policies stipulated under the second amendment to the constitution. Gun rights activists argue that it is the right of every American citizen to arm themselves as a means of protecting oneself. The debate of whether stricter gun control need be implemented or modification of the current policies done has been a raging debate. The implementation of stricter gun control continues to be a debate that questions the ethical and moral underline that gun control and gun ownership policies hold.

Citizens need to stand up and not take the blame for other individuals who choose to inflict harm. Law-abiding citizens should not be penalized for the actions of a few deranged people. It is true some weapons do not belong in the hands of untrained people, and the National Rifle Association has been instrumental in pushing for responsibility and safety on the part of gun owners without imposing too much on the Second Amendment right (Kopel). Critics such as David DeGrazia of George Washington University argue that private ownership of handguns leads to more social harms than it prevents (Hsiao and Bernstein). David DeGrazia proposes a moderate control of guns meaning that only individuals with a need for self-protection be allowed to own a gun and only after a complete course in safety (Hsiao and Berstein).

It clearly states “the people 's right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”(Second Amendment) So with that being said no one can completely take our guns away without changing the constitution. In my opinion, it is my constitutional right as a citizen of the United States of America to own a firearm. I don 't know why we would want to take away all the guns from America, the majority of people that have them use them for recreational purposes only. So why do we want to punish those people for legally following the laws and doing what they are supposed to be doing and not hurting anyone?(Farago)

It suggests that the government, but more specifically Congress, puts gun violence above the means of fighting against it. Even more so, it shows that gun violence reins over attempts to hinder it in any way and how Congress is weak because it consistently fails to effectively do anything about gun violence in America. However, congressional gridlock can be more than Congress’ refusal to pass laws that are important The United States’ wellbeing. It can be the slow-moving process of passing a law or bill to benefit Americans.

According to Bob Barr, “It's not a gun control problem; it's a cultural control problem.” Violence is one of the most cruel things on planet earth and is always being used against someone or something . People now want to impose gun control because of the violence that is causes but it is a hard process to deliver due to the people who are against it. Gun control needs to be enforced if people want to stop things like mass shootings and other outrageous crimes.

”(United States v. Miller) He ruled the NFA unconstitutional, even though he was an advocate of gun control laws. After that, it advanced to the Supreme Court for further ruling. The Court ruled that the NFA was not unconstitutional, and that it did not violate the rights of the Second Amendment. This step was quite significant, since it fell in favor of gun restriction, and went against the District Court ruling. It implied that an individual’s guns could be restricted, which led to concern that the public could end up losing guns altogether if the Court remained in favor of gun control.

The issue of gun control is an ever growing pandemic debate in the United States of America. This is an issue that intrudes on many different topics ranging from personal liberty and safety to government control and regulation. It has become a question of whether or not law abiding citizens are allowed to possess regulated firearms and to what extent they are to do so. There are many different positions on what gun control laws and regulations should be, but the two wings of the spectrum are people who believe in complete gun control and people who believe in absolutely no gun control. These two viewpoints are in constant conflict with one another and both have definitive arguments to uphold their standpoints.

Our government today has not been stopped by the second amendment, they are out of control. They have infringed upon gun rights and instituted hundreds of federal gun

Do Gun Control Laws Lessen Gun Crime? Frederic Lemieux, F. "Effect of Gun Culture and Firearm Laws on Gun Violence and Mass Shootings in the United States." International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 9.1 (2014): 74-93. The main purpose of the article is to investigate the value of two statements at the foundation of the common controversy on gun control law in the result of shootings in the United states: (1) firearm violence and extensive shootings are a cultural possibility; (2) gun crime and violence and extensive shootings are more popular due to lenient rules and laws.

The second amendment and the input of gun control laws has been a big issue, especially when the number of mass murders and shootings are continuing to grow in the United States. Putting a limit or constraint on people who own guns will not stop the problem. Putting a limit may hold someone back for a short period of time, but somehow will still find one, purchase it, and use it. Some people just own a gun for the simple purpose of protection. Three major components of the second amendment will be affected if some type of gun control were to take place and those three components are concealed carry, weapons of mass destruction, and invasion of privacy.