Also, when Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association said," That the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun ' ' (Smith). This perfectly sums up many beliefs on gun control. The beliefe that we must allow our law-abiding citizens to protect themselves and their family by letting them have a gun, not restricting them from getting
Criminals will always find ways to get guns and banning handguns will certainly not stop them. John Stossel does make a good point when he states that having laws against guns is also restricting self defense on people. Taking away the ability to buy handguns leaves citizens with less self-defense options. This raises a much bigger and serious problem, leaving people vulnerable by taking away their right to self defense and Stossel (2008) is correct to say that gun bans preventing citizens from using guns in self-defense, and giving criminals a much bigger advantage. It is naive to think that banning handguns will keep a criminal from breaking the law.
Zack Storvick 1st Period 1 January 2018 Gun Rights and Gun Control In the United States there shouldn 't be a ban on firearms. Guns should not be taken away from the people. Anti-gun viewers also have valid points such as the mass shootings in our country, but taking away guns would not solve the issues. Gun rights are backed up by the Constitution which is the foundation of our country, gun control wouldn 't stop crime, and the use of background checks plays a vital role when purchasing firearms. The second amendment gives citizens of the United States right to own weapons.
The Constitution states that we have the right to keep and bare arms, but there are some groups who have decided that 's not right. They will do anything to change the Second Amendment. This year there was a new gun legislation which adds to the long list of gun laws that already exists. In Colorado and Oregon a law was passed that says you can not buy a gun at a gun show without a background check, and a gun show not only by 3 or more persons to be. So in other words, it is illegal to exchange guns while hunting.
From Stossel’s article, he gives his opinions and reasoning on why guns are good. He states that guns protect us from harm, it stops criminals, and it makes us feel safe. We have the right to bear arm, and anyone living in the United States has that right. Even in Alter’s article, she says that Stephanie Fraser doesn’t blame the death of her husband that night of the Las Vegas shooting on gun laws. Stephanie Fraser didn't think that there was anything that could’ve been done to prevent that night from happening unless we had metal detectors wherever we went, but that’s a bit insane.
Supporting detail: With gun control, the usage of the gun is being reduce. So that, the percentage to have crime with gun is being reduce too. Limited owners of guns in gun control also should be a very effective way to reduce the crime rates. Due to people have no right to own a gun, many firearm cases such as mass shooting, firearm robbery, and shooting in lost minded can be avoided. Example: Australia is a very successful example.
Many believe that guns are for protection. Guns are used to help defend people against criminals, and other situations that may occur. States that have passed concealed carry laws have reduces their crime rate, rape, aggravated assaults, robbery, and etc. The argument that most people advocate is that guns are not the cause of the problem, the person wielding the weapon is. It is said that only criminals harm others using guns, and most gun tragedies are made by everyday citizens that go through background checks, pay fees to eventually get a gun license.
Somewhere in the region of about “32 percent of americans want guns to stay legal,” (“Politics”). The anti gun-control advocates say that banning guns will only encourage criminals to commit crimes because average citizens will no longer have a firearm to protect themselves from these criminals or to use when they go hunt for animals. This would increase the crime rate by criminals being more tempted to commit a crime if they knew that the victim was armed with a gun. The NRA, which stands for National Rifle Association does not want normal people to be punished for the acts of criminals. The NRA was created to regulate the guns that are sold and what is needed before a gun is sold to a gun owner.
Advocates of gun control seem to focus more on law abiding citizens and families from owning a firearm, yet never mention the fact that criminals are the ones misusing firearms. Criminals are careless when it comes to breaking the law, but they will care if the victims can fight back. Perhaps guns are banned, will that deter criminals from obtaining them? ( Geer 2 ) No it will not hinder them. Criminals will break the law and if they refuse to turn in their firearms they can just as easily sell illegal drugs, and make money to buy firearms illegally through black markets.
People argue that taking away these guns from normal abiding citizens does not stop criminals from obtaining these weapons. (Zimring 441) Nobody knows if this is true or not, but it is a legitimate argument for those who want the ability to own guns. They also argue that criminals would be less likely to commit a crime if they know that the victim is armed. (Zimring 441) This could be true as well, but there have been no dramatic difference in the number of deaths without or with the laws. Some also argue that gun control laws take away people’s second amendment right to bear arms.