What’s better? More guns available to although act as protection, but also pose as a threat or less guns and higher security background checks before owners are able to obtain guns? There are about 300 millions guns owned in America - that’s about one firearm per person The U.S. government permits citizens to buy guns due to their right to bear arms. However, these guns fall into the wrong hands at times as shown in the many mass shootings that have been displayed on the media several times lately. It’s time to change America’s gun laws to enforce the safety of its citizens.
Guns should be banned in America, with 30,000 deaths yearly in America, we need to do something about it. Many counties have made strict gun control laws or just have banned guns and that seems to be helping them. We have the most gun deaths out of all wealthy countries, which is unacceptable and we need to change it as fast as possible to prevent further deaths. Many people say that guns shouldn't be banned because of how the Second Amendment says, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment was written in 1791, around 225 years ago! Back then there were a lot more uses of guns.
In theory if the numbers of gun violence drop, taxpayers will be paying less in taxes. Women are the main victims when it comes to domestic violence and by enforcing the gun laws the numbers of death from a domestic relationship will drop. The significance of enforcing the gun laws is to make the rate of gun related violence to go down by making sure anyone who is trying to buy a weapon is not going to do anything illegal with it. It is just to ensure that those who have a gun are not inquired hurt their loved
It’s hard to feel safe when the ones who are supposed to be protecting you are killing you. When people decide to live in America it may be for a better standard of living, but little do they know “every 7 hours cops kill an American citizen” (Cop Crisis). Police are trained to guard, prevent crime, and enforce laws; not to kill and destroy citizens. From past research the police brutality rate has increased within in the past three years and by the end of twentysixteen there will be 1,472 or more American citizens killed by cops (Cop Crisis). The police brutality rate should be minimizing each year in America, because we’re a hospitality country, killing doesn’t serve justice correctly, and causes tension between African Americans and Caucasian Americans.
It talks about that even though cars kill many people every year they are not banned, so why should guns be banned. The texts are mainly against banning guns, but the first debater believes that running background checks are important for the safety. Another point of view on this matter is given in text 2 by the third debater, where the writer argues for banning guns. The debater supports this argument by
Michael W, shows in his article “We Need Stricter Gun Laws” how the data show that strict gun laws reduce violent crime.For example, there is a correlation between restrictive laws and lower homicide rates with and without firearms, both within the United States and internationally. Moreover, a recent study published in the Southern Medical Journal found that the presence of a gun in a home is twelve times more likely to lead to the death of a member of the household or a visitor than an intruder. ( we need,2014). With stronger gun control laws, the crime and murder rates will decrease all across the country. Countries with strict gun control have less crime.
If guns were illegal to own then that would put an end to hunting. Nearly twelve million people in the U.S. hunt annually, it’s part of many people lifestyle not to mention that many hunters use the resources that an animal provides. With guns being outlawed, it would put thousands of game wardens and workers of the Fish and Game Dept. out of work. Taxidermy would almost completely be obsolete in this situation because there would be no animals to provide these services to.
The talk about gun control has been a very popular topic nowadays due to the multiple mass shooting events that have happened over the past few years. There are always two sides, on one side we have people that want to enforce a gun control law and the other side that thinks the world is better place with guns. Not one side can be considered as the right choice but it comes down to the arguments and background information that makes one side stronger than the other. The side for gun control, it makes some strong arguments on why we should enforce those laws. From Cullinane’s article, it talks about the devastating shooting that occurred last week in Parkland, Florida.
Should kids handle guns? As the world population increases, so does the crimes beside it. Throughout decades, the world has been fighting these crimes, but today still they fail. And as our need for support and control of the public arise, we have developed many lethal weapons to do so. And one of those weapons are guns.
However, doing this will not stop felons from procuring and committing gun-related crimes. For example, take a look at the United Kingdom. Once they banned guns, there was a large spike in murders, reaching as high as 1.97 homicides per 100,000 people. The murder rate then began to decline around 2003-2004 as a result of increased police force, but has only reached a number below the pre-ban’s 1.3 homicides per 100,000 people 1 time. This shows that while a ban may limit gun violence, perpetrators will find other ways to commit crimes, such as bombings and driving vehicles through crowds.
There is no reason for someone to be having those types of military guns. Someone can and will get hurt and maybe even killed. That 's why there shouldn 't even be that class of weaponry in the United States. These types of shootings are increasing by the year, by the hour and it all can stop if we take away the guns. How many people 's ' families have to go through shooting deaths with relatives?