ipl-logo

The 2nd Amendment Rights

1991 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay on us gun history

The 2nd Amendment Right has been one of the most controversial liberties that has brought many opposing views with it. Gun control has become a vastly argued topic that has left the federal government with many ideas on it. The United States is the leader in per capita gun deaths. Just in 2016 there were 58,428 firearm incidents with 15,077 of those resulting in a death. The current year, 2017, there were almost 16,000 firearm incidents within the first 4 months of the year. Much disagreement on gun laws are because of the differences in states. Gun laws are different state to state, that includes licensing and registration of a firearm, which can make it easier for a person to obtain a firearm. These types of laws has lead to an estimated …show more content…

A loose interpretation of the 2nd Amendment looks mostly at the “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”part of the 2nd Amendment, this is usually seen from a pro-gun rights supporter as an all inclusive clause which covers an individual 's right to bear arms. In contrary to gun control supporters, they see the framers setting up the 2nd Amendment as a right for individuals to bear all arms, not only for militia use,but for personal use such as hunting or sport. And any regulation that will infringe upon someone bearing arms is a violation of what the constitution guarantees for them. Having guns is right they believe to have and the way they are used can be …show more content…

The gun debate is a long standing one that is expected to go on for many year. Both sides of the debate have their own ways of solving the argument and each side believes they are the right way to solve it. Pro gun and gun control supporters both have methods to reduce numbers of deaths and incidents, some may work and others may not, but all sides of the debate must look at America as a whole. The population and diversity of America creates so many different ideas and beliefs throughout the whole country. The differences between each side of the country leads to regions deciding on one thought that breaks up states and the country. In reality only compromise will end discussions. Compromise will help make both sides of the debate content and it will allow for people to try the other sides solutions to see where they are coming from. Now in the modern age where information is able to spread to millions in seconds and media reporting more and more things will show both sides to everyone, but it will also arm sides with more information against the other side which can grow them even more separate. Not only is this new tech separating us, but how America lives again shows the diversity of urban v.s rural life where beliefs and guns are used very differently. America still has many years of debate to come about guns and each side will bring new points, but in the end America needs compromise for the better of all

Show More
Related
1188 Words | 5 Pages

The major problem is that the political class got it all wrong when it decided to allow citizens to own guns and made it became more of a love affair. Apparently, people had held different types of rifles during the militia wars that took place a long time ago in the United States history. One most critical recognizance of the history of the guns can be seen by looking at Britain's Militia Acts that took place in 1661 and 1662. The amendment gave an opportunity for the American citizens for rival groups to fire salvos at each other, and it largely played a part in the enhancement of gun violence that is still in play in the country. It is evident that the history of guns can be traced back to the colonial times.

Read More
1853 Words | 8 Pages

The idea that the Founders wanted to put the citizens on an equal footing as the Government to provide a defence against oppression is also no longer a valid interpretation of the Second Amendment. The United States Federal Government has a vast arsenal of weapons at its disposal including Nuclear weapons, advocates of the Second Amendment would have to advocate for these weapons to be made available to all citizens. It is clear that the second Amendment does not have the same meaning as it did when it was ratified. The founding fathers did not consider the advancements of technology that exist today, or never considered the Amendment as an individual right but rather a group right for a recognised, well-regulated militia. The NRA has lobbied effectively to prevent the control and appropriate regulation of firearms in the United States of America and has taken ownership of the Second Amendment as a Battle cry against Federal Government.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

The Second Amendment (in the constitution) is one that can bring up hours and hours of debate, maybe the most of them all. These debates, unfortunately, will never come to an end because there will be know agreeance in what would be done. In my opinion, what is trying to be done right now is not going to work, the politicians in office right now want to stop the weapons and not the perpetrators. Every time there is a mass shooting/bombing the idea of gun control comes up and it is not going to get us as a nation anywhere because that is not the issue. We know who is doing these mass murders such as the Boston bombings, Paris attacks, San Bernadino shooting, and Brussels attack that happen just this morning, stricter gun laws would not have

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

The 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution Probably the most debated amendment, the Second Amendment, was originally created so the people of the US could protect themselves but people argue that now it is doing more harm than good. Some say that this amendment is only meant to protect cities with militias but most say that it is meant for individuals to protects their homes, families, and themselves with firearms. The Second Amendment has had an impact on Americans since it’s creation. To this day we still exercise this right

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

This is a big issue in the United states and in Maryland specifically. There are issues with who can purchase guns, what should be sold, and restrictions on firearms. This debate is continuous because in the U.S. Constitution we have

Read More
1485 Words | 6 Pages

Some individuals contend that the Second Amendment's text is out-of-date, unclear, and does not necessarily represent the amendment's primary intent or goals. Others believe that the Second Amendment has indeed been misunderstood and that it doesn't give an unrestricted ability to own and carry any kind of firearm. They think the amendment should be modified in order to make it more clear what it means and communicate more effectively. With the amount of shooting rampages in our nation, these forces have turned into an even more urgent issue that requires direct action. There are critics on both sides of this matter, yet, guns should be allowed to remain owned and controlled by any competent but should have more laws to

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

In the end, allowing political loyalties and partisan bias to polarize this debate on gun control only exacerbates the problem. Instead, Americans must realize that this issue is dire, and work must be done to create effective legislation while making sure to weed out legislation that is more of a liability for law-abiding citizens than anything. Allowing fear and a lack of education about gun safety to control our actions creates a vulnerable society, but pushing for gun rights over obvious safety measures creates the Wild West. Americans must push for a balance between the two in order to truly save lives and come closer to a

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

Majority of the people who oppose gun control believe that it violates the Second Amendment. The Revere Journal says that “In terms of the substance of the Second Amendment, the notion of a militia has no practical meaning today relative to what that term meant in the late 18th century. We are long past the days when farmers left the fields to become de facto soldiers, or when posses were rounded up to chase outlaws, or when settlers were on their own in a hostile environment. Some pretend that a lifestyle that no longer exists still has meaning in the America of the 21st century.” The people that agree on needing strict gun control laws will find a stronger connection to this image compared to the people who oppose

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Every country has their issues, but some countries issues are worse than others. The United States of America has a very unique issue where the whole problem is said to be allowed according to the constitution. Gun laws and the right to bear arms has been a highly controversial subject for an exceptionally long time. Hardcore Republicans, which currently rule virtually all of US Government do not contribute to the solving of this issue. If you look at the evolution of firearms, there has been a drastic change in the fire rate, ammunition capacity, range, and accuracy.

Read More
1647 Words | 7 Pages

Application of Conflict Theory to the Gun Control Debate Being a debate, the conflict theory is a very applicable theory that can be applied to guns/gun control laws and their roles in society. A debate is something that is associated with conflict, so by observing how deep and exactly in what directions this conflict extends, one might be able to understand this topic in a new light. In other words, by analyzing the very nature of this argument, this sociological perspective can be used to generate a deepened understanding of the debate on the extent of gun control laws. The Conflict Theory

Read More
1108 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most controversial issues our nation faces today is gun control laws. This controversy has been created due to the different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution which states the right of citizens to bear arms; “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School). Anti-gun control laws believe that the amendment guarantees the right to bear any kind of firearms. On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

The First Amendment has five parts to it; freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly and petition. This amendment was passed by Congress on September 25, 1789 and it was ratified by the states on December 15, 1791. The Constitution says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to peacefully assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Overall, the First Amendment protects one’s right to express themselves in America. What this means is that Congress cannot establish a nationwide religion, and that the people have the right to speak and write freely.

Read More
1776 Words | 8 Pages

1,384,171 is the number of gun related deaths in America from 1968 to 2011. 1,171,177 is the number of war-related deaths throughout American history. In just 43 years, more Americans have died from gunfire than have died in all the wars of this country 's history. Since 1963, the number of homicides involving firearms has increased 48 percent in the United States while the number of homicides committed with other weapons has risen only 10 percent. The sudden influx of gun violence correlates with a change in interpretation of the Second Amendment, which states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (Second Amendment, Bill of Rights).

Read More

More about The 2nd Amendment Rights

Related Topics

Open Document