There are advantages and disadvantages to that I see for weapon control itself and I trust that there is a major issue with how it 's introduced in the nation: People get shot, take away the firearms. Individuals can 't protect themselves, give them a weapon. It 's a muddled framework generally when you take a gander at it. There must be an answer put in request to recover to trust of residents with weapons. Despite the fact that firearms can secure, they can hurt.
If anything, in the current political climate we are in today, there would be much more social pressure for one not to own a gun than there would be to continue owning one. The stigma around guns still exists today that one only wants a gun to show off and go hunting and promote one's “toxic masculinity” as the article so gracefully puts. Nonetheless, the rhetorical questions the rhetor uses would be effective to someone on the more liberal side of the aisle to continue and promote their specific ideology about who uses guns and
(Question 7) There is a vast degree of ways in which our culture’s traditional definitions of “masculinity” can do harm to social relations and people’s well-being. An example of this is shown in the film Tough Guise. Tough Guise presents the issue of violence in America, and how that issue spans beyond simple violence or guns, but instead is an issue of the patriarchy and the cultural norm of “masculinity.” When violence is discussed in America, “real or imaginary,” (Tough Guise Film) it is almost always male violence that is being discussed. However, when the media talks about this violence, it becomes a “youth problem instead of a men’s issue” (Tough Guise Film), and the few times that gender is acknowledged, it is excused as testosterone, or boys will be boys. The reality of this mindset, and the violence that goes along with it, is that the traditional idea of “masculinity” is portrayed through male dominance and aggression, this in turn is presented throughout the violence we see in the media.
A proponent of conflict theory would see mass incarceration as another blatant example of class warfare. Society is made up of very diverse socioeconomic levels and yet our incarceration rates for lower class and racially specifics groups is sky rocketing. Conflict theorist, such as Karl Marx who saw society as a competition for power and control. (pg.16) would suggest that mass incarceration is a tool for unequal social structure. A select few powerful individuals and groups make the laws, and those laws are enforced to outlaw any behavior that threatens their interests.
Personally, I am interested in learning more about topics like this one. Gun control and violence is something catching a lot of attention in American today and I wanted to know more about it, from different perspectives. I did not have a lot of background knowledge on the topic and wanted to learn more than what is superficially presented to the public. I enjoyed how we read different arguments and worked toward a deeper understanding of the effects of gun violence on America. From this unit I have better-developed skills in annotating articles, summarizing documents, and learning new vocabulary.
He suggests that an objective definition of terrorism could be “the deliberate use or the threat to use violence against civilians in order to attain political, ideological and religious aims” (Ganor 288). It is important for a definition such as this to be accepted internationally as current definitions of terrorism can be abused by various factions. Many terrorist organizations use the current ambiguous definition of terrorism to promote their own interests and goals. Although politicians also promote their own interests and needs by making political use of the term “terrorism” by emphasizing the brutality of the term (Ganor 293). Another significant reason that an international definition for terrorism is adopted is to help emphasize the difference between terrorism
When stated throughout this essay, the statement “right to bear arms” can be widely interpreted into a large number of ideas. The topic is widely debated with one side believing it is the right to own a gun for self-defense, and the other believing it is for a standing militia. The ruling of the courts is in favor of the belief that guns should be owned for Self-defense. This belief is the reason why in 2008, the Supreme Court justice ruled that “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with
One solution that has been tested is background checks, but "background checks have proven to be more contentious in practice than in principle" (Fingerhut 2). The obvious solution is to change gun control laws. Not only is it the most evident, it is also the hardest to accomplish. The view on what the laws should be, or even if they should be changed at all, are at such odds that no matter what is changed someone will try to combat it. Another solution suggested is to look at mental health issues and "ensure accessible, high quality, culturally competent and widely accessed mental health treatment in the implementation of the Affordable Care Act" ("Gun Violence").