In all of Plato 's dialogues, Socrates ' main goal is to achieve happiness, although friends and foes alike present him pathways that could lead to pleasure, but not true happiness. Moreover, in Crito, Socrates pursues happiness by obediently following the Athenian law, whereas, Crito tries to lure him into committing an unjust action so that he can obtain the pleasure of having a friend and keeping a good reputation and so that Socrates can still have the pleasure of life on earth1. One can know that happiness and pleasure are different due to the fact that happiness is a state of being eternally fulfilled, but pleasure provides a person only an immediate and short-lived image of fulfillment.
If happiness is being eternally fulfilled, then it would not be of this world because this world has many flaws and is mortal. Therefore, happiness must be achieved through divine powers that allow us to become eternally fulfilled in life after death. However, pleasure can be of this world because it brings us moments of fulfillments instantly and then dies away quickly because pleasure is flawed because it is of this world and requires no divine power or god to obtain this short-lived image of fulfillment. Leonard Katz, states that pleasure is always directed to satisfy the needs of one 's self and as long as one 's own needs are met pleasure is achieved2. However, happiness, mentioned by Dan Haybron, requires one to seek the needs of others rather than their own needs in order to be
Examining one’s life can bring many joys. There are many things that give people the idea that their lives are meaningful. These ideas could be the pursuit of pleasure and happiness, entertainment, sports, power and money, possessions and security, being famous and success, meeting other people, knowledge and every other thing that can give the smallest amount of happiness to the person. In the apology Plato describes Socrates’ venture to question people would were wise and content with their wisdom, but when they asked a series of questions to test their wisdom they were revealed not to be wise and were now upset. The flaw in that was that these people did not examine what had happened to them and did not learn from it.
This implies that the goal is to have desires satiated, and this will result in the good life. Socrates’ argument is effective because his use of analogy makes an abstract concept easier to understand for the reader. It is now easy to see how letting one’s appetite grow indefinitely would lead to an unsatisfied life of needing to constantly refill a jar. There is still the question regarding the fact of the nature of the process of refilling the jar and if that is pleasurable, as this would start to break down Socrates’
BACKGROUND Socrates was convinced that our souls are where virtues and vices are found, they are vastly more important for our lives than our bodies or external circumstances. The quality of our souls determines the character of our lives, for better or for worse, much more than whether we are healthy or sick, or rich or poor. If we are to live well and happily, as he assumed we all want to do more than we want anything else, we must place the highest priority on the care of our souls. That means we must above all want to acquire the virtues, since they perfect our souls and enable them to direct our lives for the better. If only we could know what each of the virtues is we could then make an effort to obtain them.
According to Aristotle, an individual can achieve happiness only by realizing all the works and activities in accordance with reason throughout his lifetime. He claimed that happiness consists in cultivating and exercising virtue and it is the ultimate purpose of human existence, as stated in his work Nicomachean Ethics “He is happy who lives in accordance with complete virtue and is sufficiently equipped with external goods, not for some chance period but throughout a complete life”. However, such Aristotelian concept of happiness inevitably contradicts the understanding of history as development which maintains that fulfilling the work of human exceeds the limits of an individual and thus can only be achieved in the course of history. Three
The Pursuit of Happiness Who I am today has primarily been dictated by the environment in which I have been raised. I will continue to be molded throughout my life, but now I am entering a period of my life where I will be the one deciding who I am. Today, I am not the person I want to be and not the person who many perceive me to be, but am striving to become the man I want to be. In my life, I constantly find myself trying to balance friends, family, school, and sports.
People miss the fact that happiness comes from within. In an attempt to find joy – we must also be cautious about over excessive desire to acquire material objects and wealth. There is a delicate balance that must be reached between the pursuit of happiness, satisfaction, and contentment. While there are many conditions that fulfill ones emotional wellbeing, happiness and how we acquired it, depends upon the
Not many achieve happiness in their lifetime. Either they do not live long enough to witness it or they are not prepared for what their happiness is. Happiness is very subjective. Each person’s version of happiness is different. This version of happiness is universal.
This is said by Seneca in his Letters to Lucilius in which he states “If you live according to nature, you will never be poor; if you live according to opinion, you will never be rich” (129). While I do agree that pleasures can lead to other pleasures, I thought about psychology and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Humans have the tendency to constantly grow, and at some point they can reach self actualization, the peak of the hierarchy of needs, which could be the peak of pleasure, or a true ‘end’ to the cycle of pleasure. To further counter this argument, it is pretty obvious that a sage, or someone who has mastered either Stoicism or Epicureanism or any form of philosophy, is impossible to become. Thus the argument of not having a maximum pleasure would mean nothing because this state is impossible to become in the first place.
Joy found in earthly pleasure is temporary when you take away the pleasure you take away the happiness. True satisfaction is found by putting your faith in God and relying on him, no one can ever take God away from you, that is the one constant you will ever have. Humans and animals die and one day the earth will soon rot away to nothing but the one true God is
In Summa Theologiae (selection 6), Thomas Aquinas argues that perfect happiness can only be achieved once a person dies and enters heaven. One of the strongest arguments that Aquinas gives for this argument relies on the claim that this world is too plagued with unsatisfied desires to achieve the ultimate good which we all seek by nature. Since happiness on Earth is not perfect, only heaven can provide true happiness. In this paper, I will argue that this argument succeeds because true happiness requires something more than what this existence provides, while a sort of imperfect happiness can be found after this life.
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the concept of happiness is introduced as the ultimate good one can achieve in life as well as the ultimate goal of human existence. As Aristotle goes on to further define happiness, one can see that his concept is much different from the 21st-century view. Aristotelian happiness can be achieved through choosing to live the contemplative life, which would naturally encompass moralistic virtue. This differs significantly from the modern view of happiness, which is heavily reliant on material goods. To a person in the 21st-century, happiness is simply an emotional byproduct one experiences as a result of acquiring material goods.
However if we focus on acquiring and accumulating worldly pleasures we will lack satisfaction and joy in the
The first pleasure and enjoyment is shallow with not foundation in virtue. The second should be something a person receive, not a possession. Although the second is better then the first, the motivation is the difference between the second and the third. 3.
That even before pleasure has been achieved it can be perfect, the pleasure which is felt is just a bonus but has no further extra mean (1174b33,10). However this brings up the criticism that if pleasure is that good, isn’t the purpose of human life to gain as much pleasure as possible, making it is the chief good? I
“Happiness, on the other hand, no one chooses for the sake of these, nor, in general, for anything other than itself” Happiness is thought of differently amongst people; but happiness unlike most things is striven for, only for the sake of having it. On the contrary; things like honor and pleasure are pursued in an attempt to achieve the ultimate goal of happiness. Aristotle is picking apart the concept of happiness and directing your eyes to where he sees fit. For people tend to identify happiness with materialistic items, friends, etc.; as he refers to as “worldly goods”, or things regarding: your appearance, children, in addition to having a long life; this of which he refers to as “bodily goods”. Which in no doubt contributes to happiness.