Of course, banning prayer is illegal, which is why prayer is not banned, but prayer led by school officials or prayers officiated by the school are. The laws, in actuality, ban prayer led by the school or a school official. While a valid argument, it is incorrect. Some may say banning prayer in schools is a violation of the first amendment, but it is not the act of prayer that is banned, but prayer endorsed by the school that is
If you want to pray in school, you should do it on your own time. Do not take time away from my limited learning time so that you can pray as a class. If prayer was allowed in public schools it could cause kids of different religions to be made fun of because of what they believe in. Many people can argue that school prayer should be allowed because they have freedom of religion and those who do not want to pray can leave the room while they pray. If you make some students step out while they pray it could cause those student feel insulted and awkward because they were called out
Others connected students’ use of languages other than English with poverty or crime. A significant number of teachers explicated instructed students to not use their home language in the classroom. Ignorance/benign neglect of home language Many teachers implied that their ELLs did not use their home language in the classroom or at school in general. Some also stated that students did not use their home language at school due to lack of peers. In both cases teachers did not explicitly prohibit students from speaking their home language, nor did they invite their students to use their home language in the classroom or take any responsibility for including their students’ home language into their teaching in order to facilitate the acquisition of English language skills or the understanding of academic content.
Sherman is attempting to save children’s lives by teaching them the importance of education and not all students take advantage of that. In the story Superman and Me Sherman mentioned, “They wanted me to stay quiet when the non-indian teacher asked for answers, for volunteers, for help.” These students may feel different when a non-indian teacher asks for things because it might be out of their comfort zone. Also, Indian children are expected to fail to be accepted by other Indians in school. He also said in the story, “Then there are the sullen and already defeated Indian kids who sit in the back rows and ignore me with theatrical precision.” The ones that have taken the path away from success are not accepting they they can make a comeback
Some people may say that cyberbullying outside of school is not the schools problem and can violate some rights. In Source B, the source was about how schools had no authority to discipline a child for harassment off-campus. The constitution states that, “Congress should make no aww.. Abridging the freedom of speech” which states that they cannot punish you for something that is in the constitution. Courts ruled that a school could not discipline a student for inappropiate off-campus student speech. (Source B) It also states that some students and parents have successfully argued that cyberbullies violated civil or criminal laws by inflicting a hate crime.
To ban books or not is a rising question in America. Many authors such as Kelly Konrad and Ellen Ryan strongly believe that books should not be banned because they teach life lessons and limits freedom of speech. On the other hand, books like George Orwell’s Animal Farm have strong topics that may not suit some readers. Author Judith Krug emphasises that banning books can give people an equal opportunity. Some parents, students, and school board members think books are constantly being banned in educational facilities and libraries because of their explicit content and profanity; however; many of those same books teach important life lessons and represent freedom of speech.
Although pupils are empowered with the ability to wear items that impart a political message, pupils are not supposed to impede events going on in the world. Students should not wear arm bands because it violates the dress code and could be a distraction to learning.
At Spartanburg high, there is a zero tolerance policy no cursing or fighting as well as getting in school suspension for talking back or defiance of a teacher. Lastly I learned to be responsible for asking for help. Asking for help when I needed it was hard for me whether it was work or a lesson I did not understand. I am a shy person always has been always will be, I used to avoid asking teachers anything when I needed help. I did not want to seem like I was not smart or I wanted help but I was too afraid to ask.
Some people believe books should not be banned in schools and libraries because taking away the First Amendment right, by banning books is not right. First, the freedom of speech and press is taken away when books are banned. To begin, “When librarians and teachers reject works that may be ‘emotionally inappropriate’ for children, they’re adhering to the traditional and mostly prevailing view that children’s literature should avoid controversial topics,” (Ringel). Keeping children from using their voice
Principals may have vast authority in a school, but they do not have the same amount of authority as police officers do. A principal giving a student a Miranda type reading would be out of their jurisdiction. Students do not need to speak during this time, and many do not, therefore the principal does not need to extend their power to that of a police officer by reading a student their Miranda Warning. The Miranda Warning was created for informing criminals of their rights upon the time of their arrest, not for students. If a student was read a Miranda type warning it would just further fluster them and escalate the situation.
Although the phrase the separation of church and state is frequently misunderstood it is extremely important to know the meaning of this phrase. This is the distance between organized religion and the national state, and to sum this phrase up religious groups will not control the government and they will not dictate the government. I personally think the signers of thought the separation of the church and state was a good idea only because this keeps down confusion and it prevents individuals from being upset and thinking that they are being taxed for the purpose of someone else’s religious hospitals, schools, or