Alcohol Age Limit Would you rather the drinking age limit be lower, higher, or does it even matter? The legal drinking age limit should stay at 21, it is a pretty mature age to handle alcohol and the age limit is always changing. Under aged kids always find a way to obtain alcohol, and often times parents do not care and they’ll buy their kids alcoholic drinks. Does this law really change anything? If this law is so effective then why is under aged drinking still so high on the charts? Well, let me answer that for you. Raising the drinking age does not stop under aged drinking, it just changes where it happens. Kids are more likely to drink at home with friends or places away from adult strangers. There are many debates about the drinking age, over 100 college presidents signed a petition to reopen the debate on the drinking age. Those presidents want to ban hard alcohol in colleges, and raise the age …show more content…
Raising it would also barely reduce traffic accidents and fatalities. Kids are gonna drive with alcohol because they won’t be thinking straight. Bars and nightclubs would not really be filled up more than some already are. Kids rather drink at the beach, home, or house parties, not surrounded by random adult strangers. So my conclusion is that the legal drinking age should stay 21 because it always changes, under aged kids always find a way to obtain alcohol, and parents will often buy their children drinks. Under aged kids themselves have said that their parents, older friends, strangers and family members would buy them alcohol. Raising the alcohol age limit would barely change anything, it affects the older group of drinkers more than the younger. As far as I know the age limit is still at 21, but it may change soon, there is currently debates on whether to raise or lower the alcohol age
“If the legal age were lowered in the US it would have to come with much more education in this area, not just the shock-value of Every 15 Minutes” said Ulrike Skillman, math teacher at Saugus. Skillman suggests the lowering of the drinking age will have to come with more alcohol education and that is the exact purpose of a “drinking license.” Which would allow 18 year olds to consume alcohol, with strict regulations, then take classes to officially receive a “drinking license” at 21 years old. The license would replicate a driver’s license, but be geared toward consuming alcohol.
If young Australian who are under the age of 21 are drinking alcohol, it is too soon, too much and too risky for them. Therefore, the legal drinking age in Australia should be 21 years of age. Something that many Australian have forgotten is that all Australian states had an age of 21 drinking law in the late 60s, and that law was reduced to 18. When the age was reduced, Australian actually started to experience the rising rates of youth alcohol problems and more deaths on the road. Alcohol can have toxic effects on young people 's body.
The drinking age was specifically set to age 21 to prevent mental impairment to American youth from drinking too early. In reality the brain does not reach full maturity until at least age twentyfive. If America wants to keep its people as healthy as possible, the drinking age should be released to twentyfive. None of the reasons for why the drinking age should be adjusted matter except for the level of development the brain has. For this reason the drinking age should be no less than 21 years
But back to the matter lowering the drinking age would also produce a lot of revenue for the government and local gas stations and beer companies across the globe and it would make all of the young adults across this great country we can call home more mature in the process even though I am very mature. Particularly worrisome among adolescents is the high prevalence of binge drinking... Underage drinkers consume, on average, 4 to 5 drinks per occasion about 5 times a month. By comparison, drinkers age 26 and older consume 2 to 3 drinks per occasion, about 9 times a month. Underage drinking is a leading contributor to death from injuries, which are the main cause of death for people under age 21.
There is evidence from news and database that kids are not mature enough to drink before this age. A quantity of young adults die every year by alcoholic problem and if we keep this age, we will be saving millions of life's in future years. There are millions of people who die by alcohol, this is something very serious which affect to all of us. In addition, car accidents are the most seen but overdose is another huge factor as well. We cannot lower the drinking age; otherwise, we will allow the generations to suffer or die by this drug.
I am not trying to scare you into believing certain things; I am trying to get you to understand the reality behind drinking. Up until 1984, the drinking age for the U.S. was eighteen years old. Now, after the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 was passed, the drinking age is twenty-one, but have you ever wondered, why? When any American turns 18 years old, they are allowed to live on their own, buy cigarettes, get married, vote for the leader of our country, and risk their lives defending our country's freedom in war, but they cannot sit back with their friends and family and drink a beer. How can you be considered mature enough to put your life at risk, taking the chance of getting shot, but you are not considered to be mature enough
To address this drinking age should not be lowered to 19. Many people in families think that drinking can harm their life. It’s people jobs to take care of your health and live a happy life with families and friends. Many parents take care of their children and evidence is that an average family spent $24,164 for paying for college and kids don’t know that. People of this world it is more important that you can be more efficient that you can be of not drinking.
Lowering the drinking age: risky or safe? When teenagers turn 18, they are told that they are adults and are sent into the world. They go to college, get a job, marry or join the military. They do grown-up things like vote, pay taxes and become parents, but they can 't go to the bar for a beer.
It has instead pushed underage binge drinking into private and less controlled environments, leading to more health and life-endangering behaviors by teens. If the legal drinking age was lowered, those teens would be able to drink in a more controlled and much more safe environment where they can be monitored and supervised. Then they will be less likely to harm themselves or others. The second argument that is used is that there are fewer drunk driving accidents in countries with lower drinking ages. In quite a few countries around the world, the legal drinking age is already 18.
The minimum legal drinking age should not be lowered from the age of 21 to the age of 18. Your brain is not fully developed until about the age of 21. Another thing on why it should stay the same is people are a little more mature in their early twenties then when they were in their teens. Lowering MLDA 21 to 18 will responsibly allow a greater segment of the population to drink alcohol in bars and night clubs which are not safe environments. Almost eighty percent of bars sell alcohol to obviously intoxicated patrons; more than half of the drivers arrested for drinking while driving are while intoxicated and get a DWI.
Although it would increase revenue at businesses it will also increase the risk of drinking and driving. A lot of bartenders continue to sell drinks to a person that is clearly already highly under the influence. Their main concern at a club or bar is to make sure they are making money, not to ensure someone's
The drinking age should be lowered, because brains are not fully developed yet, colleges should be able to regulate drinking, and this can solve problems with kids underage drinking. Despite the controversy, the drinking age should decrease for many logical reasons. The drinking age has been a debate between the ages 18 to the age of 21 for a while now. Over the years, studies have showed favors toward the age of 21.
citizens, but these things are not worth gaining if it means causing much more harm than gain. Lowering the legal drinking age would risk in the health of younger drinkers and could result in much more traffic accidents. Overall, to keep young adults safe in the U.S. we must keep the legal drinking age at 21 years
If the drinking age is decreased, then there would be no need for such
A poll taken on July 2014 asked the public opinion of US adults for lowering the US legal drinking age from 21 to 18. Approximately 74% of the people opposed the idea, whereas roughly 25% of the people supported the idea ("Public Opinion" 1). The statistics indicate satisfaction among the majority of the people; however, with the current laws many issues arise that must be addressed concerning alcohol use. For starters, studies show an increase of dangerous drinking habits among young adults (Hall 2). In addition, the enforcement of the drinking laws and education on alcohol is insubstantial (Moyse, Fonder 3).