Research Evidence
Supporting empirical evidence is overwhelming for the restorative justice process and its use with young offenders in the juvenile justice system and because of this, focus will be placed on adult offender studies.
The Center for Restorative Justice & Peacemaking at the University of Minnesota conducted an independent review of multiple meta-analyses of restorative justice programs. In these studies, victims participated on average in about 50% of the cases but rates as high as 90% were reported. The willingness to participate was motivated by the need to help the offender change their life choices, understand the justification of the crime, and to share their pain with the offender (Umbreit, Vos, & Coates, 2006, p. 2).
…show more content…
It appears on the multiple studies reviewed in this report there is a variation in the response pending the severity of the offense and the type of restorative justice utilized. It is indicated Sentencing Circles are consistent in all arenas; they report a low recidivism rate in relation to all levels of crime severity. Over all, recidivism rates were down with restorative justice programs when compared to traditional programs. Statistics reported dependable results noting when offenders did re-offend the crimes were not as violent or severe and this was found not to be the circumstance with traditional programs (Umbreit, Vos, & Coates, 2006, p. …show more content…
history has undeniably proven incarceration of the masses is not the answer to restoring justice in our communities. There is not one program or theory that will resolve all crime or criminal activity at all levels. The definition of crime is fluid as society, itself, defines crime, thus society creates crime. Those in society with the greatest power and status, in the majority of cases tend to be those with the highest incomes, are the most influential in defining and creating crime. Those same individuals are those who represent our political beliefs and agendas. The politics of crime control will forever be ongoing the pendulum from left to right will never hold stable, nor should it. It does appear restorative justice encompasses values and beliefs from all sides enough so to reach a middle ground of
110). According to the author, the aim of restorative justice is to heal communities from an incident where people were harmed and, ideally, help prevent the same thing from happening again. I believe that, there is going to be a higher possibility of crime reduction in schools and in different neighborhood if victims and offenders mediate a restitution agreement to the satisfaction of each other. In conjunction to this, if the government can be more committed in supporting these approaches, I believe that there will be a massive drop in crime
Criminal legislation and incarceration have long been used as a means to control "powerless" and disadvantaged groups in America. These groups are socially and politically neglected and only receive attention when they are perceived to be a threat to the larger society and then the attention comes in the form of control and punishment (Page, 1993). The control generally manifests itself through crime legislation and the punishment through incarceration. By the end of 2005, there were more than 7 million people under some form of criminal justice supervision (Glaze & Bonczar 2006; Harrison & Beck, 2006a). With such a large and growing number of people under correctional control during a time in which crime rates had either fallen or were stabilizing raises important questions about the purpose and consequences of this institutional intervention.
They believe that the accused might follow the process and falsely play a role in the circle to avoid further punishment. It is often viewed as a shortcut for discipline, and the accused will not succeed in learning their lesson. However, the results of R.J. circles on the accused are exhibited from the recidivism rates collected by author Sujatha Baliga. The article states, “youth who participated in the program were 44 percent less likely to commit future crimes than those whose crimes were addressed through the county’s juvenile justice system” (Baliga). As seen from this statistic, restorative justice circles have impacted the accused and guided them into a better life with responsible decisions.
Criminal Justice Reform addresses structural issues in criminal justice systems such as racial profiling, police brutality, overcriminalization, mass incarceration, and recidivism. The United States incarcerates its citizens more than any other country. Mass incarceration disproportionally impacts the poor, and people of color, and does not make us safer. In an attempt to balance safety and justice for those accused of a crime, many jurisdictions have enacted new criminal laws. Some examples of this new approach include the elimination of cash bail, decriminalization of actions previously treated as crimes, and refusal to prosecute persons arrested for crimes.
A study done by Criminal justice inspection Northern Ireland found the rate of recidivism went down when young offenders were diverted into restorative justice furthermore study concludes that people were often quite pleased with the outcome of the restorative justice(Restorative Justice Council,
Several factors have contributed to this, namely harsh sentencing laws, mandatory minimum sentences, and the war on drugs being a major factor. It has often been argued that this approach to criminal justice has made ineffective and unjust use of the law, and has had a disproportionate impact on the communities of color as a result. Criminal justice reform advocates also call for changes to the way that evidence is handled, as well as improvements to the quality of legal representation for defendants. Taking a further step to address the issue of recidivism, or the likelihood that a person will reoffend after being released from prison. As a result, criminal justice reform is about creating a fairer and more just system that addresses the needs of everyone involved, from victims to defendants to society as a whole.
In 1972, former President Richard Nixon made his infamous statements regarding crime and drug abuse. In this speech, he declared a war on crime and drugs and intended to decrease the number of people using drugs and the amount of crimes that were committed. Since this declaration, incarceration rates in the U.S. have gone up by 500%, even though the amount of crime happening has gone down. One of the reasons why I feel our rates have risen, is because sometimes, we put people in jail when they don’t need to be there in the first place.
The appropriateness of the current situation in American criminal justice is a matter of ongoing dialogue and evaluation. Public opinion, advocacy movements, legal developments, and policy initiatives all contribute to shaping the direction of criminal justice reform. It is a complex and evolving field, and there are diverse perspectives on what changes are necessary to create a more just and equitable system. Ultimately, it is up to individuals, communities, policymakers, and society as a whole to engage in informed discussions, assess the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, and work towards a criminal justice system that aligns with their values, promotes public safety, and ensures justice for
This process will ensure that each offender receives the proper punishment and that the community is satisfied with the decision. The offender-based models, retributive and utilitarian, does not help the victim recover. Restorative justice is designed
Restorative Justice processes are likely to reduce criminals from repeating offenses, as numerous recidivism studies have demonstrated. Thus, it would be more than justified to employ restorative processes a response to crimes under
Today our justice system has a multitude of options when dealing with those who are convicted of offenses. However, many argue that retributive justice is the only real justice there is. This is mainly because its advantage is that it gives criminals the appropriate punishment that they deserve. The goals of this approach are clear and direct. In his book The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Zehr Howard (2002), illustrates that the central focus of retributive justice is offenders getting what they deserve (p. 30).
In an in-depth review of the four dispositions, Klein’s (1986) study shows that at the end of 6 months, 36% of all offenders were rearrested. Klein notes during his study that the greater the stigmatization the greater chance of rearrest. This proves to be true, as after 15 months 50% of the total offenders in the four dispositions have been rearrested, and after 27 months 60% of the total offenders have been rearrested, except for petitioned offenders, where 75% were rearrested. However, less than 50% of those juveniles who were outright released were not rearrested (Klein, 1986). Consequently, juveniles who were outright released benefited from not receiving societal reactions that would change their self-perception from labels, unlike that of the other two independent variables of Juvenile Justice and the social service system.
The United States has a larger percent of its population incarcerated than any other country. America is responsible for a quarter of the world’s inmates, and its incarceration rate is growing exponentially. The expense generated by these overcrowded prisons cost the country a substantial amount of money every year. While people are incarcerated for several reasons, the country’s prisons are focused on punishment rather than reform, and the result is a misguided system that fails to rehabilitate criminals or discourage crime. This literature review will discuss the ineffectiveness of the United States’ criminal justice system and how mass incarceration of non-violent offenders, racial profiling, and a high rate of recidivism has become a problem.
According to the dictionary, the term justice is described as “a being righteous; fairness” and to bring to justice is defined as “to treat fitly or fairly” (Pollock). Based upon these definitions the question that is brought forth in many debates regarding crime prevention is the means to whether or not certain policies fall under the terms of being just. In my political socialization paper, I discussed how my political ideology has influenced my thinking regarding crime control and prevention. Through out my paper I comprehended the fundamental arguments of the liberalist view, and outlaid the aspects that were most important to their interpretations of crime. The liberal view is rooted from the belief that crime and poverty manifest from
Batley (2005) stated that restorative justice is about restoring, healing and re- integrating victims, offenders, as well as the society and also preventing further harm. In this assignment, I will be discussing approaches to restorative justice and illustrating their advantages and disadvantages to offending. I will also provide the applications of these five approaches of restorative justice which are retributive approach, utilitarian deterrence approach, rehabilitation approach, restitution approach and restorative approach in the given case study. I will then explain my preferred approach to justice through identifying a personal belief or value that underpins my choice.