The Revolutionary War was fought with the intention of emancipation of from a greater power and being able to enjoy the rights of self-government and self-determination. Many enslaved African Americans related to the rebel’s cause and their struggle to be free. They believe that once the United States gained its freedom, they would be freed as well. However this was not the case. As the century of the revolution closed, many political decisions led to slavery being entrenched even further in American Society. The recently ratified Constitution of The United States, the discovery of cotton as a cash crop, and the Louisiana Purchase all led to the westward expansion of slavery in America.
Shortly after the failure of the Articles of Confederation,
…show more content…
The document itself emphasized heavily on the rights that should be ensured to each and every American, but those rights were usually denied to those bound to servitude. The Constitution did nothing to halt the progression of slavery as the book stated, “The framers of the Constitution left slavery’s status within the existing states under the jurisdiction of the state legislatures” (Pg. 135). This quote explains that the Constitution took no formal stance on the matter of slavery, instead left the matter in the hands of the states. However, there were still provisions in the Constitution that protected slavery for years to come. The Constitution, which supposedly protected the freedoms of its constituents, had a stark amount of provisions which protected the institution of slavery in the United States. The first section of the Constitution in discussion is Article 1, Section 2, more commonly known as the Three-Fifths Compromise. This article was used in the determination of representation of the states in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College. The high population of slaves in the south often equated to political power …show more content…
The admission of Missouri to the Union was met with discontent because many believed it would disrupt the tranquility of having an even number of slave states and free states. The solution was raised to admit the newest northern state of Maine into the union as a free state, maintaining the balance. After this decision was made, they banned slavery in the new territories above the latitude of 36°30’. This solution was referred to as the Missouri Compromise. This may have been seen a victory because of its limitation on the spread of slavery, but the compromise also led to slavery also becoming more deep-seated in the southern way of
The United States Constitution was Americas first governing document which would guarantee the citizens freedom and equality; however, would also promote and protect slavery. After the constitution was written, the African slave trade would be protected up until 1808. Northern states were outlawing slavery, while southern states were trying to preserve slavery. Slavery was a way for southern states to gain addition representation within congress.
Written in 1787, the American Constitution was a text that set the precedence for how the United States would be for the next hundreds of years, making it a document that was crucial for the success of the country. Just is a word derived from the Latin root word “jus” meaning law or right. Justice refers to laws that are fair, righteous, and exemplify the morals and ethics of the American people. The Constitution did structure the new government in a sufficient way, such as giving Congress the power and creating the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches to serve as the checks and balances of the power. However, the Constitution needed to have equality, morality, and ethics that was not included, primarily in social justice issues.
When talking about the constitution in today’s world I don’t think anyone would disagree about the constitution being an anti-slavery document. The 13th amendment abolishes slavery and any form of service that isn’t voluntary. But at the time of the writing of the constitution I think there would be a strong argument for why the constitution was a pro-slavery document. The north and the south had different views on slavery, but they also agreed on some things. When talking about the slaves they had a big role in the constitution.
Constitution did not want to put the word slavery in the document; however, the Constitution has some aspects of slavery such as slave trading, runaways, and representation. Under this Constitution, the new government does not have the authority to outlaw the importation of enslaved people into the U. S. for 20 years. All states were required to return fugitives from bondage to the slaveholders they escaped from. Lasty, representation of slaves was an issue heavily discussed. The slave states wanted more representation, so they argued that slaves should be accounted for.
This Amendment made it so that Slaves had no severity. Each of these Amendments, Douglass and Garrison felt, provided incentive for slavery and a platform for the continuation of slavery. In that the Constitution was inherently pro-slavery. Although, as Douglass spent more time stuffing the Constitution his ideas began to
They also “included the three-fifths clause which states that in deciding how many representatives a state could send to the house of representatives, the number would be determined by counting free persons, servants, in three-fifths of all other persons { slaves }. Congress was to use the same count for collecting taxes from the states”. Indians were excluded. Finally the framers agreed to include the fugitive slave clause which states that persons who escape from slavery to a state where slavery was prohibited “ shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labour may be due”. The compromise on slavery was designed to satisfy the demands of some of the southern states these states would not have supported the constitution without this agreement.
The United States Constitution of 1787 was created in order to build a strong infrastructure for our country to pave a pathway for the future people in charge of the law. The topic in which the constitution was pro slavery or anti slavery was highly controversial for a number of reasons. This topic put the government into many debates though its constitutional convention as the word slavery itself was never said in the actual document. Even Though it was not said, it was clear that the ones in power were biased toward the slave owners in the country based on the provisions that were made. It may be debated as something in between as nothing was explicitly stated, but the three-fifths compromise stating that enslaved persons were not three fifths
In the first draft of the Constitution, it obeyed with proslavery delegates who wanted the Constitution to stop the government from regulating the slave trade in the Atlantic because they believed it would have a terrible effect against slavery. Once this first draft was published, antislavery northerners protested and proposed that the government should have the power to regulate and even abolish slavery after 1808. Having even the first draft of the document state that the government would not have rights over slaveholders in the south reinforces the claim of the Constitution being a proslavery document. The reason they changed the first draft is that of the uproar it was causing with the Northerners who were antislavery. If there was no backlash, this section might have been kept the same and unchanged, but because of the backlash, the Constitution was forced to change which in the end decided to compromise for each side of the spectrum vaguely.
Did the Constitution Establish A Just Government? In July of 1776, soon after the Declaration of Independence was signed, The Second Continental Congress was faced with the arduous task of creating a piece of legislation that would help govern their nation successfully. They drew concepts from the Enlightenment including, but not limited to, the idea that the governments main goal was to protect the natural rights of citizens and that the government received all its power through a social contract. These ideas enabled them to draft the Constitution of 1787, which is the basis of modern American government.
However he clearly describes how these motivations led to the document we have today. Lynd states that the argument over slavery divided the government, as well as the thirteen colonies, into north and south. This sectionalism led to many of the compromises in the constitution today. With the South wanting to keep slavery, and the North wanting to abolish it, the tension between the two sides was very high. Lynch, a southerner, stated “ if it is debated, whether their Slaves are their Property, there is an end of the Confederation”, this ultimatum provides the reasoning behind the fact that slavery is not mentioned in the constitution.
Throughout history, slavery has always been a problem and it still exists today. The United States does not have slavery due to amendments in the constitution. Although there is no amendment that completely states no slavery, there are however, three specific instances in the constitution that prevent slavery from happening. One of them is the three-fifths compromise. Another is the fugitive slave clause, and the last one is the 13th amendment.
The word slavery is not mentioned in the clause of the constitution but rather it is implied. Article I, Section 9 explains the issues on importation and taxation of the slave trade. As the clauses states, “The Migration and Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person”. The phrase "Migration and Importation of such Persons" implies the slave trade. Afterwards, the clause clearly states that the states that exist (which were the thirteen colonies) can allow slavery, however the new colonies cannot.
Ultimately, the U.S. Constitution was pro-slavery because there wasn 't anything in it that was overly anti-slavery; slavery was being supported. I think that it makes sense to have the Constitution be pro-slavery because the country was left in a chaotic state after the Articles of Confederation failed and it needed to become united fast. To quickly unite the country, the Constitution needed everyone’s support and help, which couldn 't have been received without slavery. The large slave states wouldn 't have ratified the Constitution if slavery was going to be abolished
Our nation contemporarily hails the Constitution as a protector of the people’s rights — but we often fail to remember that it accomplished grand measures to secure the system of slavery. The year of 1787, when the Constitution was signed, was a year of great tension among members of American society. Vast numbers of people were in support of slavery, and many of its opposers were afraid to speak up about their beliefs. The Constitution attempted to retain a neutral position on the issue, but it ultimately failed by instituting safeguards against the freedom or equal recognition of slaves as members of America.
DBQ Essay The American Revolution was a rebellion from citizens in Britain that was inspired from many events, including the creation of the United States of America. A revolution is a forcible overthrow of a government to acquire a new system. The American Revolution was sparked from a variety of occurrences ranging from speeches to letters to documents, therefore causing the revolution to become the most significant yet. There were many influential people/concepts that added ignition to the revolution, including Abigail Adams, Leon F. Litwack, and the article from Northwest Ordinance.