Rhetorical Analysis: The Moon Landing

663 Words3 Pages

The moon landing was one of the most iconic moments in history. Viewers stood on their toes until the very moment that Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon, and they stayed there until Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin landed on American soil again. Authors The Times, William Safire, and Ayn Rand speak on the moon landing soon after the mission was accomplished. In the morning after America successfully landed the first aircraft on the moon, The Times published an article about the moon landing. Everyone in the world was interested in the moon landing. People across the world read this article to learn more about the moon landing.This article showed an overview of what happened on the ground breaking day.This article is effective because it shows how the moon …show more content…

Viewers of the rocket taking off would read this commentary. Ayn Rand stood by as the rocket shot towards the sky, and she recorded her thoughts of the day.The commentary involved the timeline and actions that Rand went through on the day of the moon landing. It seems much more relatable, since the writer made a nonfiction commentary have a storyline. Ethos is implied by Ayn Rand being a known novelist. She has automatic credibility because she has written stories before, so she knows how to make the story relatable. Logos is applied by using imagery. She uses so many details such as “The dark red fire parted into two gigantic wings…” The reader can envision the fire separating from one stream to two. Readers found the effective commentary reliable in that imagery that she puts forth. The moon landing mission housed a great accomplishment for the world. They burst through the glass that separated space and soil. The three authors are all well known publishers and writers. Authors all over the world found these pieces effective and reliable. Viewers and readers became aware of the effect that the moon landing

Show More
Open Document