In the book Silence by Sarah Roche-Mahdi, the author depicts the life of Silence, the daughter of Cador and Eufemie, who grows up and lives under the disguise of a boy under the rule of King Evan, a stern yet respected leader who prohibits women from inheriting any land or possessions. The portrayal of justice is notable throughout the novel as every character confronts this idea of justice at some point, and Roche-Mahdi clearly expresses that the responsibility to uphold justice often lies within those in positions of power. At the beginning of the novel, King Evan is introduced as the one who upholds justice in the realm by maintaining peace and chivalry (Roche-Mahdi 7). He is responsible for the well-being of his kingdom, and Roche-Mahdi …show more content…
First, the power of authority heightens one’s desire to preserve their image. When the queen cries to the king that Silence assaulted her, the king immediately begins questioning how his image will be affected. He explains that he must “do his utmost to figure out a way to save his honor” in response to the event (197). His authority leads him to worry about how the general public will judge him for his actions. Furthermore, the king of France exhibits this same behavior when he receives the counterfeit letter from King Evan ordering Silence’s death. Upon reading this letter, the king of France begins to worry for his own reputation and spends much time debating with his council on how to safeguard his own honor (215-219). This power of authority heightens the kings’ desire to preserve their image above all else, and by doing so, this desire promotes selfish action. After regarding his honor, King Evan ultimately decides to not punish Silence for the alleged assault and even pretends it did not happen, simply for his own reputation (199). This desire to preserve his image leads him to act selfishly and prioritize his own welfare over others. The king of France is led down a similar path as he contemplates how to respond to …show more content…
When Silence catches and confronts the minstrels about their plan to murder Silence out of greed, the minstrels are forced to own up to their scheme and they peacefully depart from Silence (163). This moment exemplifies justice because the minstrels directly admit their misconduct and take accountability for their failed murder attempt. Justice is also demonstrated towards the end of the book when the Queen’s extramarital affair and lies about Silence are revealed by Merlin (311-313). The Queen is directly held responsible for her actions and faces punishment for such actions. These examples showcase justice being served because people are taking accountability and facing consequences for their actions. On the contrary, injustice is also shown throughout the novel, which is simply when one does not take accountability for their actions. An example of this is when Count Cador orders for every minstrel to be “seized or captured” and then “burned or hanged” (147) after Silence goes missing with a couple of minstrels. Thousands of minstrels are punished for a crime that they did not commit, and the two minstrels who took Silence never face such consequences. Justice requires those to take accountability for their actions, and since the minstrels both fail to do so and deflect
He urges those in power that if they “ want to keep their post must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (863). His ideas are actually showing that people in power remain so because they have the ability to do good but avoid doing so. Public policy is based on principles, yet politicians don’t create public policies that can do good for the people because they fear loss of power. In this case he is utilizing public policy to protect his power and therefore defending his personal interest. Furthering claims, he asserts “Since a prince cannot use this virtue of liberality in such as to become known for it unless he harms his own security”(865).
In response to the accusation of being an outside agitator, King said, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" (Evans 32). He mocked the notion that he was responsible if nonviolence provoked violence from those in authority. "Isn't it like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated an evil act of robbery?" (Evans 32).
Alyssa Farris Dr. Michael Torrence English 1020 10 February 2015 1. Review paragraphs 1-4 carefully. What is King's purpose in that section of the Letter? Who is he addressing and how does he attempt to build confidence and trust (ethos)? How does his tone show awareness of his actions?
In contrast, making the Transgressor a martyr only sparked another flame in Equality 7-2521 as a young boy. The Transgressor had stared at Equality 7-2521 “trying to tell us something through the flames” (51). This newly found spark leads Equality 7-2521 to follow a similar path of the Transgressor. This also leads us to the punishments Equality receives. After being late to the Home of the Street Sweepers, he does not give his explanation of tardiness.
By dismantling the clergymen’s claim, King proves the innocence and integrity of his actions. In another attempt at criticizing him, the clergymen claim that King must advocate for protesters to adhere to and comply with all laws, regardless of their opinions, because he constantly demands for peaceful protest. However, he refutes this statement by alluding to St. Augustine’s belief “that ‘an unjust law is no law at all’” (King 4). St. Augustine’s comment on the legitimacy of a law signifies that if a law is immoral or degrades the human character, then the law is deemed invalid and should never have been instituted in the first place.
mock your king?” (Collier and Collier). Mr. Meeker is fiercely loyal to his king and believes rebellious ideals constitute “treason”. Their obvious differences in opinion strains their relationship, as neither will compromise their beliefs. Furthermore, the whole country has divided
These two character are supposed to be the “bad guys”, they steal from people and do many other things that are a sign of evil. The life lesson that is trying to be taught here is it is not tolerable to commit crimes. In the book the Duke and the Dauphin pretend they are someone who they aren’t, they try to steal inheritance from a dead family member who isn’t even their own family. Once they get caught they are tarred and feathered by the townspeople . It is not respectful to commit crimes and try to get away with it, people who think it’s perfectly fine to live in sin should have a punishment.
Ethos helps the speaker keep up with his standing as a dependable nonentity. Readers ought to comprehend that he is holding back nothing. King Jr. makes emotive requests to convey the critical predicament of basic liberties and cases that his restriction in Birmingham Prison proves his urgency. Equally, the ruler's utilization of logos supports the public authority's rebel character. In the letter, certain individuals need change and the people who go against it.
This displays the King's character,in being unwilling to let the people opinion and assemble against his ruling. He inhibited
When compared to a dictator who has killed thousands of innocent people, it defines that the person being compared has done just as bad or has a similar thought process. This way of thinking creates cognitive dissonance in the clergymen because they may not be ruthless people, but King displays to them the signs that they can be, if the keep at the unjust path.
Looking at this letter from King’s time period, one may seem to not understand where King was coming from because the issue was still fresh, but today his letter has lots of
Through logos, King makes commonsense statements to bring unity between him and the audience. As readers study Kings letter, they see him establishing himself as a well educated, knowledgeable, and strong leader who genuinely cares about “just and unjust” laws. King states a quote from St. Augustine that “An unjust law is no law at all” (3). As an exemplary appeal to readers, King uses Hitler and the Hungarian freedom fighters to make the point that “everything Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’ and “everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was ‘illegal’ ” (3). He goes on to make the strong point that legal does not mean right.
Injustice means lack of fairness or justice, and/or an unjust act or occurrence according to the dictionary. Upon reading three stories of injustice, one might find that some reactions are more understandable than others. ‘Young Goodman Brown’, ‘The Lesson’, and ‘Saboteur’ are all stories of a character being handed some form of injustice. Mr. Chiu in ‘Saboteur’ had the most understandable response to his injustice. Goodman Brown learns about all the bad in the world from a dream, Sylvia learns about the injustice of racial discrimination, and Mr. Chiu learns about injustice through the police.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once said that, “envy is ignorance; imitation is suicide.” (370). John Knowles’ A Separate Peace is set during World War I at Devon School, a boarding school for boys. The book centers on Gene Forrester, a student at Devon, who could be described as an intelligent, but jealous, conformist. A Separate Peace illustrates Gene’s envy and imitation of his friend, Finny, and how it affects himself and his relationship with Finny, and also how Gene eventually finds peace.
Everyone Agree? Perfect. "Nothing builds authority up like silence, splendor of the strong and shelter of the weak" (Charles de Gaulle). This idea is reflected in Ken Kesey’s novel One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, where it is shown how authority becomes more powerful by abusing the silence of the people.