Socrates Vs Plato
The book starts out with Socrates and Glaucon heading home from a festival. While on their way home they are interrupted by a group of their friends who eventually convince them to come hang out with them for a while. Once they arrived at the house, Socrates sees his old friend Cephalous, who is Polermarchus father. The two starting catching up and eventually started talking about being old. As their conversation continues it starts changing subjects from being old to what justice really is and means, which is what leads to the whole topic of the book. Polermarchus suggest that justice is “doing good to your friends and harm to your enemies.” At first his statement was considered, until they starting discussing it more and its faults became apparent. After arguing it even more Socrates came to a conclusion that “justice is the excellence of the soul.” …show more content…
According to Plato, an ideal society consists of three main classes of people. The producers (farmers, craftsmen, etc.), auxiliaries (warriors), and guardians (rulers). He believes that a society is just when relations between these three classes are right. In order for a society to function peacefully, each group must preform its appropriate function; such as rulers ruling, auxiliaries upholding ruler’s convictions and producers making supplies for the better of the people. In order to maintain justice, each person must fulfill their societal
Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic
342 Words | 2 Pagesthe Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame
Comparing Socrates Apology And The Crito
1678 Words | 7 PagesThe statement made by Socrates “Even were the whole world against me, I had best be in harmony with myself”. Socrates in his mind the whole world that he knew was coming down on him. With the counsel of judges that Socrates
Russell Vs Socrates
559 Words | 3 PagesThe first concept that I noticed shared by Russell and Socrates was the concept that one had to remove themselves before serious philosophical contemplation could take place. In Russell 's case, he refers to the "Self" and the "Not-Self". With Socrates, as seen in the Apology, confronting his accuser about the corruption of youth, his accuser is silent because he had not given the matter any thought. Socrates awareness of his own ignorance frees him from what Russell would refer to as "Self". I mention this because it serves as a common theme even as both philosophers differ in their messages.
John Locke's Concept Of Justice
1751 Words | 8 PagesPlato regarded justice as the true principle of social life. Plato in his day found a lot of evil in society. He saw unrighteousness rampant and injustice enthroned.
Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?
832 Words | 4 PagesI believe that Plato believes that people are inherently good and they will do what is morally right and just for society. They will earn their right to power and ensure fairness for all to prevent the tyrants from trying to take control. Plato mentions three main arguments regarding
Private Life In Socrates's Apology
1021 Words | 5 PagesThrough becoming a teacher of the young men who followed him in Athens, Socrates effectively began to enter the public life. He was able to influence others through sharing his conclusions of justice, self-examination, and piety, and by asking relentless questions. Socrates effectively showed that an individual can live a private and a public life, even if Socrates was not directly involved in the policy-making in Athens. An individual can combine these two aspects of life in a productive way allowing her/him to live a full existence. These individuals can become teachers, politicians, and activists who use their focus on justice and piety in their private lives to advocate and create laws that promote true justice for the rest of the
The Role Of Polemarchus 'Justice In Socrates'
770 Words | 4 PagesWhen it comes to justice, Polemarchus believes that justice is “…helping friends and harming enemies.”. Socrates questions this point of view because according to Polemarchus’ view point, only the people who are close to him and in his circle of friends would be worthy of any kind of Justice. Polemarchus is wrong in this viewpoint because if only the people that you know who are of your similar social status and you interact with on a day to day basis are considered friends, what of those that you do not know? Or what of those who are not of your social status, that you do not interact with? Socrates questions this by asking, “Do you mean by friends those who seem to be good to an individual, or those who are, even if they don't seem to be, and similar with enemies?”.
Socrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic
1169 Words | 5 PagesAccording to Socrates there are two types of justice, the political justice and the justice of a particular man. As we know, city is bigger than a man. Socrates believes that it is easier to find justice at the political level which means in the city, thus he tries to define a just city from scrap, and will see in which stage justice enters. Also, Socrates tries to find justice in the city before finding justice in the individuals because individuals are not at all self-sufficient. We humans have similar needs such as food, clothing and shelter and in order to accomplish these goals human beings form unions, where each and every individual specializes in a field.
Socrates Vs. Unjust One In Plato's The Republic
643 Words | 3 PagesIn Plato’s, The Republic, Book I, Socrates tries to prove to Thrasymachus “whether just people also live better and are happier than unjust ones” (352d). He argues that everything has a predisposed proficiency at a function, and that this functions are performed well by the peculiar virtue and badly by means of its vice (353a-353d) . The point of this paper is to present Socrates argument and evaluate it to the best of my ability. This argument can be categorized as an inductive generalization. Socrates states that the function of anything is what it alone can do or what it does best.
Plato Vs Machiavelli
429 Words | 2 PagesPlato claims that in order to maintain a harmonious polis, the people must accept their position as they were born to be by Mother Nature. Only those born with a gold heart will be rulers and they will look over those born craftsmen, farmers who have copper hearts and auxiliaries who have
The Noble Lie In Plato's The Republic
1355 Words | 6 PagesWhat is justice? This is the crucial question that Plato attempts to answer in his dialogue, The Republic. He conjures up an allegory that justice can be found in a person, and a person can represent a city. Thus, his entire dialogue focuses on this ‘just’ city and the mechanics of how the city would operate. His dialogue covers a myriad of topics about justice in addition to the human soul, politics, goodness and truth.
Plato And Aristotle And Plato's Power And Authority
1212 Words | 5 Pages1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.
Just Society In Plato's Republic
943 Words | 4 PagesIn Plato’s Republic, Socrates comes to the conclusion that we need to have a strong just society that is in the right order. In Books IV, V, and VI, Socrates explains that every society needs to be built on justice, everyone needs to have an occupation, and what a male and female household should look like. These are my prerequisites to what I consider essential to create a just society. Because without these qualities in an established society, you can hurt an entire civilization. And to Socrates argument, with an ideal king will come forms of co-operated citizens of a city.
How Did Plato Say That As People Formed Communities
157 Words | 1 PagesPlato argued that as humans were not self-sufficient, people formed communities by reaping benefits of specialization of labor. Thus, people were divided into different classes based upon their indispensable nature of the role they played in the production of goods. However, societies at the same time also needed certain additional services, like a judiciary and army. Thus, Plato categorized people looking after the management of the society as its “guardians”, who are the philosophers.
Similarities Between Plato And Socrates
984 Words | 4 Pages“Plato’s philosophy is an attempt to justify Socrates’ belief in the objectivity of moral virtues.” As one of Socrates’ most loyal disciples, Plato’s own philosophy was heavily influenced by Socrates’ own thoughts and teachings. Much of Plato’s philosophy is a direct extension of some of the questions Socrates posed, i.e., Socrates asked what justice is, and Plato explored this question in his own writings. It is Socrates’ code of ethics, however, that most closely corresponds with Plato’s ethics.
More about Socrates Vs Plato
Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic
342 Words | 2 PagesComparing Socrates Apology And The Crito
1678 Words | 7 PagesRussell Vs Socrates
559 Words | 3 PagesJohn Locke's Concept Of Justice
1751 Words | 8 PagesPlato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?
832 Words | 4 PagesPrivate Life In Socrates's Apology
1021 Words | 5 PagesThe Role Of Polemarchus 'Justice In Socrates'
770 Words | 4 PagesSocrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic
1169 Words | 5 PagesSocrates Vs. Unjust One In Plato's The Republic
643 Words | 3 PagesPlato Vs Machiavelli
429 Words | 2 PagesThe Noble Lie In Plato's The Republic
1355 Words | 6 PagesPlato And Aristotle And Plato's Power And Authority
1212 Words | 5 PagesJust Society In Plato's Republic
943 Words | 4 PagesHow Did Plato Say That As People Formed Communities
157 Words | 1 PagesSimilarities Between Plato And Socrates
984 Words | 4 Pages