ipl-logo

Stanley Milgram Experiment Ethical Or Unethical

459 Words2 Pages

In 1963 Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment that used subjects to deliver "electric shocks" under the observation of an experiment in experimenter, authoritative figure. The purpose of the study was to observed the connection between obedience to authority and personal conscious. The experiment proceeded with the subject asking a member of Milgram's Team (whom they did not know was a member or Milgram's team) questions, and every time they got it wrong the subject would send an electric shock to the member of Milgram's team. Although the study did not harm the member of Milgram's team. The experiment is still debated on whether it was ethical or unethical. Diana Baumrind provides her reasoning on why the study of obedience was unethical. The study of obedience became one of the most controversial experiments in psychology. …show more content…

His lack of concern is shown by making his subjects continue on with the procedure even after some subjects display nervous tension which sometimes led to uncontrollable seizures. Milgram responded to the argument by saying that the extreme nervous tension was unexpected by both himself and other professionals. Baumrind argues that the study of obedience shouldn't should not have been conducted in a laboratory because the participants were more likely to obey the experimenter due to the atmosphere of the study and the participant trust in the experimenter. Milgram refuted Baumrind by stating that the setting was well suited to study obedience because it is similar to other situations where obedience is present and

Show More
Related

Summary Of Opening Skinner's Box By Lauren Slater

743 Words | 3 Pages

Among multiple issues including giving misleading information, the most dominate is the lack of consent Milgram received from his subjects to participate in such a test (102). While I do see that this is immoral, there is no way that Milgram could have completed his experiments effectively if he had done it morally. The first issue is if he explains what is actually going to happen during the experiments, that would obviously hurt the integrity of his results. Also, going back to how the experiments help us, if those who participated knew what was going to happen, it wouldn’t have affected them as severely. It was the shock that the experiment gave that brought their life choices into question.

Read More

Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee's In The Perils Of Obedience

1352 Words | 6 Pages

He led his men to issue a code red on a marine who was underperforming due to health concerns. The group went along with it. They followed the leader just like the experiment has shown. Not only were the soldiers following orders from an authoritative figure, but they did it without any questions as they are trained to do so. This therefore shows the relation of obedience by respecting authority, between the Stanley Milgram shock experiment, and A Few Good

Read More

In Cold Blood And The Milgram Experiment

1043 Words | 5 Pages

This Milgram research on respect to authority figures was a series of cultural science experiments conducted by Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram in 1961. They assessed the willingness of survey participants, men from a different variety of jobs with varying degrees of training, to obey the authority figure who taught them to do acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to think that they were helping an unrelated research, in which they had to distribute electrical shocks to the individual. These fake electrical shocks gradually increased to grades that could have been deadly had they been true. McLeod's article about the Milgram experiment exposed the fact that a high percentage of ordinary people will

Read More

Why Is The Milgram Experiment Re-Created Today

1509 Words | 7 Pages

When the Milgram obedience experiments were being conducted the core of the experiments were all based on the false impression that an electrical shock would be administered to another individual at the push of a button with an incorrect answer, when in fact they weren’t. If the Milgram experiments were not based on lies and each participant did in fact administer a shock to another individual in response to a wrong answer, I feel that the results would have been the same with no alternative result. The reason for this would be because from the very beginning of the experiment the participants already believed that they would be actually administering an electrical shock. The participant’s reactions and concerns before, during and even after the experiments were all real with their true feelings and thoughts about their participation of either walking away from the experiment or completing the experiment. If the participants were to know that the electric shocks they were administering were not real, then the whole purpose of the experiment would have been useless and unnecessary.

Read More

The Milgram Experiments

992 Words | 4 Pages

He saw that the more personal, or close, the real participant had to be to the fake one, while they were being shocked, affected the obedience as well. He also noticed that if there were two other fake participants teaching that refused to shock their learners that the real participant would not comply. Finally, he tested the experimenter telling the real patient to shock the learner by telephone, instead of actually being there in person, reduced obedience as well (McLead). The Milgram experiment and the Nuremburg trials can relate extensively to explain how the Holocaust happened the way it did.

Read More

Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience And Philip Zimbardo

1071 Words | 5 Pages

However, Zimbardo and Milgram were ethical in their experimental procedure and proves blind obedience was a factor in each subject. Both Milgram and Zimbardo’s articles effectively highlight the ethics surrounding their respective experiments. Both authors began their articles with an unbiased

Read More

How Does Jack Use Torture In Lord Of The Flies

1142 Words | 5 Pages

In the Milgram shock experiment, participants were told to shock a “tester” when they got a wrong answer. This was staged so that the tester would almost always get the wrong answer. The goal was to see how far a participant was willing to increase the shock strength when presented with an order. According to Khan Academy “Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work became patently clear, and they were asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority” (Khan Academy). The article also states, “When the results of the study came out, they were actually really disturbing because 65% of participants shocked all the way” (Khan Academy).

Read More

Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience

1014 Words | 5 Pages

Like Psychologist Diana Baumrind did so in her article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments”. Where she makes it very clear that she disagrees with causing individuals stress and discomfort. In her article, Baumrind states “It is potentially harmful to a subject to commit, on the course of an experiment, acts which he himself considers unworthy, particularly when he has been entrapped into committing such acts by an individual he has reason to trust” which in this case the trustworthy individual would be Stanley Milgram. Baumrind also worried about the dangers of the serious aftereffects that may ensure because of the stress and discomfort Stanley Milgram’s experiment has caused. Even though Stanley Milgram states that “After the interview, procedures were undertaken to assure that the subject would leave the laboratory in a state of well-being.”

Read More

Why Is Milgram's Research Important?

950 Words | 4 Pages

While arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test

Read More

The Milgram Experiment Essay

981 Words | 4 Pages

The Milgram experiment was conducted to analyze obedience to authority figures. The experiment was conducted on men from varying ages and varying levels of education. The participants were told that they would be teaching other participants to memorize a pair of words. They believed that this was an experiment that was being conducted to measure the effect that punishment has on learning, because of this they were told they had to electric shock the learner every time that they answered a question wrong. The experiment then sought out to measure with what willingness the participants obeyed the authority figure, even when they were instructed to commit actions which they seemed uncomfortable with.

Read More

Stanley Milgram Experiment Papers

928 Words | 4 Pages

Name : Muhammed Irshad Madonna ID : 250509 Subject : Medical Ethics Due Date : 8/01/2018 Paper : 1-The Milgram Experiment The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a famous study about obedience in psychology which has been carried out by a Psychologist at the Yale University named, Stanley Milgram. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. In July 1961 the experiment was started for researching that how long a person can harm another person by obeying an instructor.

Read More

Stanley Milgram's Ethical Controversy

182 Words | 1 Pages

A lot of research is considered “ethically questionable” in the world of psychology. In order to get answers scholars have gone to extreme measures to gather information. Many of which are very controversial but where do we draw the line? The main concern is the safety and well being of participants. Stanley Milgram (1963) is infamous for his methods of study, he is known for his obedience experiments.

Read More

Chapter Summary Of The Book 'Opening Skinner's Box'

708 Words | 3 Pages

There had been experimentation on obedience but none had been done like Milgram’s. The experimenter warns, “In this experiment, one of you will be the learner and receive shocks when you make a mistake in word pairs read to you, and the other one will be the teacher and administer the shocks when the word pair repetition is wrong.” (Slater 33). He wanted to see if people would shock a person continuously because someone had told them to. Milgram wanted to know how far people would go.

Read More

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not

746 Words | 3 Pages

The experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.

Read More

Stanley Milgram's Experiment

1509 Words | 7 Pages

Many of the participants pleaded to stop, but the authority figure had them continue. But, Milgram argued that this situation was short-term, because once they saw that the learner was in fact fine, their stress level decreased. The final ethnical issue was the right to withdrawal. They should make it plain and simply to the participants that they have the right to withdrawal anytime throughout the experiment.

Read More

More about Stanley Milgram Experiment Ethical Or Unethical

Related Topics

Open Document