Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
There are many ways to find out how individuals would react in certain situations, for example, by putting individuals in a simulation. Causing stress and discomfort to individuals in order to gain knowledge is at times necessary. For example, Stanley Milgram’s experiments which focus on obedience to authority and the extent a person is willing to ignore their own ethical beliefs and cause pain to another individual, just because he is ordered to do so. Stanley Milgram writes about his experiments and results in his article “The Perils of Obedience”. In his experiments Stanley Milgram causes subjects who have volunteered to be a part of them some stress and discomfort in order to receive relevant results. While some individuals believe they would never turn into puppets …show more content…
Like Psychologist Diana Baumrind did so in her article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments”. Where she makes it very clear that she disagrees with causing individuals stress and discomfort. In her article, Baumrind states “It is potentially harmful to a subject to commit, on the course of an experiment, acts which he himself considers unworthy, particularly when he has been entrapped into committing such acts by an individual he has reason to trust” which in this case the trustworthy individual would be Stanley Milgram. Baumrind also worried about the dangers of the serious aftereffects that may ensure because of the stress and discomfort Stanley Milgram’s experiment has caused. Even though Stanley Milgram states that “After the interview, procedures were undertaken to assure that the subject would leave the laboratory in a state of well-being.” Baumrind was not convinced the measures taken were enough to restore the subjects state of well-being. Baumrind disagreed even though stress and discomfort are both factors in life that cannot be
Summary Of Opening Skinner's Box By Lauren Slater
743 Words | 3 PagesAmong multiple issues including giving misleading information, the most dominate is the lack of consent Milgram received from his subjects to participate in such a test (102). While I do see that this is immoral, there is no way that Milgram could have completed his experiments effectively if he had done it morally. The first issue is if he explains what is actually going to happen during the experiments, that would obviously hurt the integrity of his results. Also, going back to how the experiments help us, if those who participated knew what was going to happen, it wouldn’t have affected them as severely. It was the shock that the experiment gave that brought their life choices into question.
In Cold Blood And The Milgram Experiment
1043 Words | 5 PagesThis Milgram research on respect to authority figures was a series of cultural science experiments conducted by Yale University scientist Stanley Milgram in 1961. They assessed the willingness of survey participants, men from a different variety of jobs with varying degrees of training, to obey the authority figure who taught them to do acts conflicting with their personal conscience. Participants were led to think that they were helping an unrelated research, in which they had to distribute electrical shocks to the individual. These fake electrical shocks gradually increased to grades that could have been deadly had they been true. McLeod's article about the Milgram experiment exposed the fact that a high percentage of ordinary people will
Review Of Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
1297 Words | 6 PagesStanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in 1963 regarding the obedience to authority in “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrates that when placed under peculiar circumstances, ordinary citizens are capable of performing terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings by concluding that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the well-being of the learner (Milgram 86). Herbert C. Kelman, a Harvard University Social Ethics professor, and V. Lee Hamilton, a former University of Maryland Sociology chair, share of a U.S. military massacre in “The My Lai Massacre: A Military
What Rationale Does The Author Give For Conducting The Study
424 Words | 2 PagesObedience is tested by how long the subject will continue to “shock the victim”. The point of this study is to determine if Americans are obedient even if they know the act is wrong. 2. What is/are the research questions and/or hypothesis/hypotheses? How obedient would subjects be to researchers when it comes to shocking a victim?
The Milgram Experiments
992 Words | 4 PagesSociety and government require people to be obedient towards authority, but is it always the best thing to do? During the aftermath of World War II many of the major leaders of the Nazi regime were put on trial for crimes against humanity (History.com). These trials were known as the Nuremburg war trials, were most of the convicted proclaimed that they were “just following orders” (McLeod 584). Being an accomplice to a crime is also against the law. In the Nuremburg trials, those accused were not breaking the law that their government had created, they were actually following it.
Conformity In Lord Of The Flies
612 Words | 3 PagesAs stated in our textbook, “Conformity is a change in behavior or belief as the result of real or imagined group pressure.” One can believe that most people will torture an innocent person just because they are ordered to because of the conditioning received since childhood. Obedience is a type of social influence where someone acts in response to a direct order from an authoritative figure doing the influencing. The epitome experiment by Stanley Milgram concluded that most people followed orders from the authoritative figure regardless how immoral the act was. People continued to send electric shock to people knowing that it was causing pain and can possibly lead to death.
The Perils Of Obedience Analysis
720 Words | 3 PagesThe author begins by describing obedience in relation to social life and how it is often framed in history and literature. For example, Plato is thought to have grappled with the age old question of whether one should obey even if it does not comply with your conscience. This line of thinking is precisely what Milgram was observing in her experiments. Milgram conducted an experiment in which she tested the limits of how much pain an ordinary person can inflict on another person after being ordered to by an
Unethical Human Experimentation
886 Words | 4 PagesHuman experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.
Why Is Milgram's Research Important?
950 Words | 4 PagesWhile arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test
Pros And Cons Of The Little Albert Experiment
621 Words | 3 PagesCritics have argued that the study was highly unethical because it involved the conditioning of a young child to develop a phobia. The Little Albert experiment is also widely regarded as a classic example of unethical research due to several factors. First, the study involved the use of an infant subject who was unable to give informed consent or understand the nature of the experiment. Second, the experimenters subjected Albert to a significant amount of stress and fear, which could have caused long-term psychological harm. Finally, the study lacked adequate debriefing and follow-up procedures, which meant that Albert was never given the opportunity to overcome his fear or receive any kind of counseling or
The Milgram Experiment Essay
981 Words | 4 PagesThe Milgram experiment was conducted to analyze obedience to authority figures. The experiment was conducted on men from varying ages and varying levels of education. The participants were told that they would be teaching other participants to memorize a pair of words. They believed that this was an experiment that was being conducted to measure the effect that punishment has on learning, because of this they were told they had to electric shock the learner every time that they answered a question wrong. The experiment then sought out to measure with what willingness the participants obeyed the authority figure, even when they were instructed to commit actions which they seemed uncomfortable with.
How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesTwo ‘prisoners’ had to be removed early from the experiment and several were emotionally distressed. However, it does show the power of situation on people’s behavior and decision-making. The people chosen for the experiment were regular students. They were assigned to their roles randomly – the prisoners had not done anything ‘wrong’ and the guards had not earned their position of authority.
Chapter Summary Of The Book 'Opening Skinner's Box'
708 Words | 3 PagesHis experiment was all a hoax. The shock machine was fake. All he wanted was to know how many people would be obedient and how many would be defiant. Much to Milgram’s surprise sixty-five percent of people did what were told of them, and only thirty-five percent were
Hitler's Essay: The Perils Of Obedience
1596 Words | 7 Pages"Be quiet! Write this down." We sometimes hear this or something like this quite often. We experience, witness, hear or come across commands, instructions, directions and orders daily at our workplaces, homes and schools. What are the factors that forces us or obey (or disobey) them?
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Can Normal People Behaving Evil?
858 Words | 4 PagesNormal People Behaving Evil The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment to see if normal people would change their behavior in a role-play as a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was conducted by Dr.Philip Zimbardo in 1973 at Stanford University that caused numerous amount of trauma to prisoners by prison guards in their role-playing position which forced Dr. Zimbardo to officially terminate the experiment six days after it was introduced. Due to the cruel aggressive behaviors from the guards, the experiment led to a question, "Do "normal" people have the capability of behaving badly?" The answer to that question is that most likely an individual who behave normally will have the capability of expressing evil behavior due to the environment that they are surrounded.
More about Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
Summary Of Opening Skinner's Box By Lauren Slater
743 Words | 3 PagesIn Cold Blood And The Milgram Experiment
1043 Words | 5 PagesReview Of Stanley Milgram's The Perils Of Obedience
1297 Words | 6 PagesWhat Rationale Does The Author Give For Conducting The Study
424 Words | 2 PagesThe Milgram Experiments
992 Words | 4 PagesConformity In Lord Of The Flies
612 Words | 3 PagesThe Perils Of Obedience Analysis
720 Words | 3 PagesUnethical Human Experimentation
886 Words | 4 PagesWhy Is Milgram's Research Important?
950 Words | 4 PagesPros And Cons Of The Little Albert Experiment
621 Words | 3 PagesThe Milgram Experiment Essay
981 Words | 4 PagesHow Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesChapter Summary Of The Book 'Opening Skinner's Box'
708 Words | 3 PagesHitler's Essay: The Perils Of Obedience
1596 Words | 7 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment: Can Normal People Behaving Evil?
858 Words | 4 Pages