Stephanie Ericsson The Ways We Lie Analysis

451 Words2 Pages

Lying has not been formally considered morally wrong or right regardless of the severity. Although it’s near impossible to go through a whole day without even stretching the truth once and decide which types of lies are okay or not. Stephanie Ericsson uses strong metaphors and personal experiences in “The Ways We Lie” to justify the use of our everyday lying. This unbiased essay will help readers decide whether it’s okay to lie on a daily basis. Ericsson starts out with saying she told the bank that her deposit was in the mail even though she hadn't written out the check (495). This already has more than half of the readers feeling related to her on account of her use of ethos. It show her as a regular person who lies not because she intends to but …show more content…

Assuming these help the readers further understand how she stresses the truth of lying. It being something that we should realize more but although at the same time lying is a natural thing that happens everyday. She also includes various uses of loaded language to emphasize the most important aspects of lying. Towards the end of the essay she states “ Our acceptance of lies becomes a cultural cancer that eventually shrouds and reorders reality until moral garbage become as invisible to us as water is to fish.”(501) arguing that lying is a major problem that need fixed before everyone life just become one huge lie. This technique persuades the readers into agreeing, because she’s seen as a normal everyday person like the reader. Given these points, Ericsson concludes that lying is a natural habit all humans own. Do not beat yourself up if you can’t go one day without lying, because it’s is both good and bad depending on the case. Stephanie Ericsson justifies the habits of lying in “The Ways We Lie” using firsthand experiences and solid metaphors. Essentially, Take into consideration before you lie, because it could be at someone else's

Show More
Open Document