A group of teenagers stole a puppy from his owners garden and abused him for hours. According to an RSPCA inspector, this is one of the worst cases the inspector had ever seen. The tiny chihuahua yorkshire terrier mix, named Chunky, was kicked, burned, hit, fed drugs, and had his neck squeezed before being left for dead. The eight month dog was eventually found and taken to a vet immediately. After four months, Chunky has fully recovered physically and is nice and playful. However, Chunky remains traumatized from the incident to this day. In the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, he argues that animals do not deserve to be treated the way they are treated. They have a right to be free from oppression, captivity, and maltreatment from humans. Animals are like us in many ways that we have never imagined before. They eat, sleep, feel pain, experience stress, love, care, and …show more content…
According to “A Change of Heart about Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin, he mentions that “Koko, the 300-pound gorilla at the Gorilla Foundation in Northern California, who was taught sign language and has mastered more than 1,000 signs and understands several thousand English words” (61). This shows that animals are far more capable than what we imagine. Rifkin also claims that Scientists have found that geese teach their goslings their migration routes and that an orangutan from Atlanta Zoo, used a mirror to groom his teeth and fix his sunglasses. This shows that learning is passed on from parent to offspring and that animals may use their intelligence for their own purposes. Furthermore, many people believe that animals have no moralities or ethics and are unable to understand the notion of death. This is not necessarily true as it appears that animals experience grief. For example, elephants frequently stand next to their dead loved ones for days while also touching their bodies with their trunks. Animals show grief in their own
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
The evil and quieted puppy went into writhings as a seizure went ahead, and the professional's skin was broken on her hand when the pooch started to seize (Enos, Sara 2014). " These points of interest won't be found on a nibble report yet you will find that a "chomp" happened from a pit bull. Charlotte's next point expresses, "Another report distributed in the April 2011 issue of Annals of Surgery found that one individual is killed by a pit bull each 14 days, two individuals are harmed by a pit bull each day, and youthful youngsters are particularly in danger". While there is most likely that pit bulls do assault individuals, they are by all account not the only canine breed to assault and even execute. In a report by the CDC from 1979 to 1998, the examination found that Pit bulls and Rottweilers alone represented 67% of passings, yet there were likewise a few Bull mastiffs, Boxers, Bull Terriers, Great Danes, St. Bernards, a Rhodesian Ridgeback, a bulldog, and a Newfoundland that were accounted for to have executed a man.
Although Jeremy Rifkin, Bob stevens, and Lois Frazier have all written about their view on animals and how they are treated globally, but when bringing in animal rights groups like ASPCA and PETA, different bias and tactics are newly introduced. Of all the articles, Jeremy Rifkin uses the most credible sources such as lab studies and examples. In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Rifkin uses sources such as Purdue University and the European union when talking about situations. One situation he writes about is how pigs need social activity so the pigs are not “lacking mental and physical stimuli [which] hand result in deterioration of health”.
In “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy Rifkin says “many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.” By doing so, Rifkin tries to appeal to human emotions through the use of pathos, in order to reflect our current viewpoint to match his opinion. Although animals have cognitive abilities and emotions similar to humans, I have to disagree on the basis that we should not change the way that we normally treat animals because of survival of the fittest and that human lives should be put over animals’. Despite the fact that it seems inhumane to treat animals poorly, it is actually beneficial to the lives of people. Rifkin raises questions such as, “So what does all of this portend for the way we treat our fellow
In the article “A Change of Heart About Animals” by Jeremy Rifkin published in the Los Angeles Times on September 1, 2003 Rifkin advocates for the ethical treatment of animals and discusses how people perceive, and at times underestimate, animals and their abilities. Two letters were written, one by Lois Frazier and the other by Bob Stevens, to Rifkin in response to “A Change of Heart About Animals” and were published in the Los Angeles Times editorial section. Each letter expresses the author’s individual opinion on Rifkin’s convictions. Rifkin uses scientific studies, such as the ones conducted at Purdue University on pigs’ social behavior (Source #1 par. 4), to support his belief that
Many Americans blindly believe that animals deserve the same rights as humans, but little do they know about the differences between the welfare of animals and the rights of animals. In the article A Change of Heart about Animals, Jeremy Rifkin cleverly uses certain negative words in order to convince the readers that animals need to be given same rights as humans, and if not more. Research has shown that non-human animals have the ability to “feel pain, suffer and experience stress, affection, excitement and even love” (Rifkin 33). Animals may be able to feel emotions, however this does not necessarily mean that they are able to understand what having rights mean. While humans must accept their moral responsibility to properly care for animals,
Their level of intelligence is at a really high place and are 99% of the time underestimated because they are animals. Brian chemistry of rats show that when they play, their brains release large amounts of dopamine, which is a neurochemical associated with pleasure and excitement in human beings. As noted, some animals have a high knowledge in many areas, for example in “A Change of Hearts about Animals” they state that a gorilla had been taught how to use sign language which most humans can't/won’t do. It also came out that their IQ test were between 70 and 95. Not only is this taught to animals, but they also have self awareness themselves and taught other skills on top of
Jeremy Rifkin, the president of the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington D.C and author of “A Change of Heart About Animals” (2003), argues in this article that animals are much more like humans than we thought and that we should expand our empathy to our fellow creatures. Rifkin develops his thesis by comparing the similarities between humans and animals. An example of this is in paragraph 11 when he claims that animals show a sense of their own mortality and the mortality of their kin just like humans do. He supports this claim by giving an example of elephants standing next to their dead children for days after they have passed. The author gives that example of the elephants in order to make the reader understands just how aware these
In the next section, “The Case of the Disobedient Orangutans”, the author further delves into the concept of language and animal behavior by arguing that orangutans develop a “vocabulary”, a type of language when interacting with their trainers. The author uses situations found in literature, research, and real life examples to illustrate that animals are more sophisticated than initially considered and have an ability to work with a language. “Wittgenstein’s Lion” begins with a reference to Immanuel Kant and his role in separating human beings from animals by saying that animals apparently do not cry. This beginning is
In An Animal’s Place, Michael Pollan describes the growing acknowledgement of animal rights, particularly America’s decision between vegetarianism and meat-eating. However, this growing sense of sentiment towards animals is coupled with a growing sense of brutality in farms and science labs. According to Pollan, the lacking respect for specific species of animals lies in the fact that they are absent from human’s everyday lives; enabling them to avoid acknowledgment of what they are doing when partaking in brutality towards animals. He presents arguments for why vegetarianism would make sense in certain instances and why it would not and ultimately lead to the decision of eating-meat while treating the animals fairly in the process. Pollan
Interview Interviewer: (laughs) Oh now I understand, there is always a hidden meaning behind your peculiar poetry. The comparison with Caroline Norton’s touching poem ‘The Arabs horseman’s farewell to his animal’ is mentioned in the poem ‘The Abandonment of Autos’.
In the op-ed piece “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin emphasizes the similarities between humans and animals by providing results on scientific research studies to illustrate that humans should be more empathetic towards animals. In addition, he further explains how research results have changed the ways humans perceived animals and indicates solutions that were taken by other countries and organizations to help improve and protect animal rights. Rifkin provides examples that demonstrate animals have emotions, conceptual abilities, self awareness, and a sense of individualism just like humans. For example, Pigs crave for affection and get depressed easily when isolated, two birds Betty and Abel have tool making skills, Koko
Throughout Utopia, Thomas More’s opinion regarding the relationship between humankind and animals was prevalent through Hythloday’s perspective. Particularly, this correlation was seen in instances surrounding war, and crimes. Although humans were seen as the superior, more intelligent animal, More believed that humans often reverted back to and were considered animals when they gave into their vices (More). For example, in Utopia, Hythloday brought up his view in regards to punishment for crimes.
In section 3. Why Animalism is Unpopular, of “An Argument for Animalism,” Eric Olson argues that animalism is unpopular amongst contemporary philosophers. Animalism, according to Olson, is a theory that humans are numerically identical to animals (“An Argument for Animalism”, 610). This means that there is a particular human organism and that organism is you; the human organism and you are one in the same. When thinking about personal identity, Olson reasons that contemporary philosophers don’t ask what kind of things we are.
TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE ISSUE OF CONTROL LIE AT THE REALTIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS, PLANT AND ANIMAL? SHREY JAIN SHIV NADAR UNIVERSITY AAA0511 INTRODUCTION Charles Darwin once said ‘In the long history of humankind (and animal kind too), those who learned to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed’. It is an inherently established tendency amongst specie of one kind to establish their control over their counterparts. Very often, this control is established through means of force.