ipl-logo

Summary Of Antonin Scalia's Adoption Of The Constitution

688 Words3 Pages

The articles written by Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer both contribute valid insight on how the Constitution should be interpreted. They, however, end up taking conflicting views on whether to adopt what is known as a living constitution or to bind the judiciary by the original meaning of the document. Throughout their works, the authors mention the importance of objectivity, judicial restraint and the historical context in which the Constitution was written under and whether or not it should apply to the United States today. Scalia argues in favor of the originalist approach, stating that he supports neither a strict nor a loose interpretation of the Constitution, but rather, a reasonable interpretation. Breyer sides with the cosequentialist ideals, claiming that active participation in collective power is paramount when it comes to evaluating the Constitution's place in American law. Furthermore, in their articles, Scalia and Breyer both take time to criticize their opponent's arguments. This results in some interesting and well thought out points formulated by each party. Scalia begins his piece by …show more content…

One of Scalia's first arguments in favor of the enduring Constitution claims that the document already has a means of changing without having to interpret it in a different way. The amendment process presents a way to alter the Constitution to remain compatible with modern American society without having to pretend that the words the founders wrote two hundred years ago mean something they do not. The issue with this school of thought lies with the fact that passing an amendment is an incredibly demanding process. It requires an astounding amount of cooperation from Congress, the Senate and the President. Creating an amendment for every last minute alteration to the Constitution would be unreasonably time consuming and

Show More
Related

Summary Of A More Perfect Constitution By Larry Sabato

308 Words | 2 Pages

n his book A More Perfect Constitution, Larry Sabato proposes the idea of a six year presidential term with a possible extra two years based on a confirmation election. This is a flawed proposal for many reasons. He says that “nothing wastes time, resources, and capital for a president and his chief advisors like planning for a reelection campaign” (Sabato 84). This is correct but in his proposal for the six year presidential term he adds on a confirmation election where the people vote for if they want another two years of the term, making it 8 years. The confirmation election is just another reelection campaign that would be expensive and dirty for both parties, like Sabato stated that reelection campaigns are bad.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Meese And Brennan

181 Words | 1 Pages

Justice William Brennan and Attorney General Edwin Meese held different views on the interpretation of the Constitution when it came to ruling in a case. Brennan held the view that judicial review should be done constitutionally, but to keep human dignity in mind when ruling in a case. Brennan makes his opinion on the matter known saying, “The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights solemnly committed the United States to be a country where the dignity and rights of all persons were equal before all authority.” (Brennan). Unlike Brennan, Meese believed in sticking strictly to what the constitution stated for most matters.

Read More

Edwin Meese III Analysis

131 Words | 1 Pages

Edwin Meese III held quite a different view as compared to that of William Brennan. Meese held the opinion of strictly following exactly what is stated in the Constitution of the United States, otherwise known as fidelity. In his essay he focuses on fidelity often. Edwin Meese portrays his belief in his essay as he quoted Justice Joseph Story, “The First and fundamental rule in the interpretation of all instruments is, to construe them according to the sense of the terms, and the intention of the parties.” (Meese).

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Op-Ed Article By Robert Barnes

1280 Words | 6 Pages

The explicit way he writes shows that he understands their passion for their own community and relates to such, as his own writing holds a passionate tone as well. Obviously, Barnes’ article may offend to justices of the Supreme Court, but because of the knowledge of their packed schedule, any of the justices reading or even knowing of an existing op-ed article is very low. This enables for Barnes to criticize the Supreme Court in any way he wants, thus allowing for his article to be more effective. Moreover, Barnes enable his own writing to hold more significance with a greater presence gone, also emphasizing how fervent attitude to the case and the results with the repeated inclusions of direct quotes of the justices who spoke out on the court statement. With every quotation, Barnes demonstrates the conflicting ideologies of statement and action in the Supreme Court.

Read More

The House That Scalia Built Summary

234 Words | 1 Pages

In her Column “The House That Scalia Built”(2016), Jamie Stiehm argues suggest that supreme court justice Antonin Scalia is dead everything will fall apart. Stiehm backs her statement up with logos, she says “often callous in withering dissents on, for example, gay marriage.” Stiehm hopes to persuade her readers to think nothing will go the republicans way anymore. Stiehm uses a mocking sarcastic approach in her column to show she has no sympathy for his death and just wanted her way of thinking.

Read More

Antonin Scalia Textualism Summary

1541 Words | 7 Pages

Textualism, as Antonin Scalia describes it, is inconsistent in its nature. While he first claims that a good textualist would never interpret the law with the legislator’s intent in mind, Scalia later violates his own convictions by allowing for corrections of Scrivener’s errors. In principle, correcting Scrivener’s errors requires the judge to think about what the original writer meant to say with the statute, not the literal meaning of the text. This may mean adding a single additional word to the statute, but something as deceptively simple as one word could have drastic effects on the meaning of the law. Therefore, Scalia cannot claim to account for Scrivener’s errors while also chastising methods of interpretation that consider what the

Read More

The Texas Constitution: The American Political System

140 Words | 1 Pages

The Texas Constitution amended so often because it was not written very well. Texas is currently governed by its sixth constitution, which ratified in 1876. The Texas Constitution illustrates how the political system was a chaos, since in the 1876 Constitution, there was already five predecessors in only forty years. In comparison with the U.S Constitution, which was relatively simple when it came to talk about the national system, the Texas Constitution was completely complex and confusing. Another reason why the Texas Constitution was amended so many times it was because they didn 't have a strong government like the U.S Constitution did.

Read More

Scalia's Interpretation Of The Living Constitution

65 Words | 1 Pages

I disagree that the “Living Constitution” will destroy it because society changes and the laws that govern it need to change also. I think that Scalia was stuck in an outdated mindset of viewing the constitution. I agree with you that Breyer 's argument was the better of the two, and I agree that the interpretation of the constitution should be flexible and not be fixed.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brennan And Edwin Meese

194 Words | 1 Pages

Prior to the reading of both essays of Supreme Court Justice William Brennan and Attorney General Edwin Meese my personal opinion was to interpret the constitution as best fitting for the current situation, whatever that may be. Post reading that opinion that I held changed. After reading these essays I realized that it is more important to stick as closely to what the framers of the constitution meant as possible. As stated in Meese’s essay, “Any true approach to constitutional interpretation must respect the document in all its parts and be faithful to the Constitution in its entirety.

Read More

A Conversation On The Constitution: Justice Breyer And Justice Scalia

751 Words | 4 Pages

In current day America there are two main ways of interpreting the constitution. These two ways are known as textualist and developmentalist philosophies. In the video “A Conversation on the Constitution” Justice Breyer and Justice Scalia both showcase many examples of these two philosophies and have a discussion on how both methods affect the modern political scene. This leads to a very insightful discussion on how the constitution should be interpreted; should it be interpreted as written or be interpreted to align with current societal values.

Read More

The Constitution's Two Stage Amendment Process

61 Words | 1 Pages

There have been thousands amendments proposed in Congress. The Constitution creates a two-stage amendment process. This process is known as the proposal and ratification. It is extremely difficult for an amendment to become a part of the Constitution. Therefore, an amendment can be blocked at any given time.

Read More

The Jurisprudence And Legacy Of Scalia

349 Words | 2 Pages

According to the celebration of the Constitution Day, I have been able to hear the debate between Professor Ralph A. Rossum and Professor Bruce Allen Murphy about Scalia: The Jurisprudence and Legacy of an Originalist. Professor Rossum came first and talked about the composition in Constitution, some cases happening during recent years, and the ideas of Scalia. About the Constitution, he illustrates that law was not permanent, it involves documents relating to time. By discussing the significance of tax, structure, and historical analyses of establishing the Constitution, Scalia’s idea shows up that Justice will make their own mistakes based on their laws. Majority opinions cannot always be conceivable due to the jury.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Living Constitutionalism

992 Words | 4 Pages

In Troph v. Dulles (1958) Chief Justice Warren wrote that the eight amendment is evolving. A living Constitution seems harmless for it is merely adapting to culture, but in reality it is removing the rock solid foundation of our nation with sand that cannot withhold a storm. For example, truth is becoming subjective to where anyone can take a part of the Constitution and twist its interpretation, but instead of being a Constitution, it is merely acting as an opinion piece. Many living Constitutionalist attempt to justify their stance by stating that the Constitution was for slavery, but Scalia responds well against their justification in his writing Originalism: The Lesser Evil. Living

Read More

Retroactivity Pros And Cons

1279 Words | 6 Pages

(The concurrence was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy.) Scalia argued that the majority’s analysis of text and legislative history subverted Bowen’s [CITE] clear statement rule of retroactivity and transformed the rule into a “discernible legislative intent” rule. [CITE.] Justice Scalia also took issue with the Court’s understanding of retroactivity and the substance-or-procedure distinction that was critical to its vested rights analysis.

Read More

Key Constitutional Concepts By Leonore Annemore Annenberg Institute For Civics

644 Words | 3 Pages

The Leonore Annenberg Institute for Civics video titled “Key Constitutional Concepts” explores the history of the creation of the United States Constitution in addition to key concepts crucial to the document. Two central themes explored in the video include the protection of personal rights and importance of checks and balances. The video strives to explain these concepts through Supreme Court cases Gideon v. Wainwright and Youngstown v. Sawyer. To begin, the video retraces the steps leading up to the Constitutional Convention in Virginia in 1787. It opens by explaining the conflict that led to the Revolutionary War and the fragility of the new nation.

Read More

More about Summary Of Antonin Scalia's Adoption Of The Constitution

Related Topics

Open Document