In 2014, Titus Kaphar created a painting named, Behind the Myth of Benevolence. This painting reimagines the famous portrait by Rembrandt Peale, Thomas Jefferson, simply consisting of a depiction of Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States. In the other portrait, an unclothed, Black woman is portrayed. The two portraits are distinguished by a curtain-like effect creating the illusion of the Jefferson portrait falling off and revealing the scene behind, the depiction of the Black woman that was once hidden. In his painting, Titus Kaphar aims to demonstrate the institutionalized rape and abuse of Black women at the hands of white slave owners throughout history, and in doing so, forces viewers to confront the harsh realities …show more content…
The composition and stylistic choices in this painting contribute to showcasing the exploitation of black women throughout history. Firstly, this portrait begs the question, can art amend history? Through this portrait, Kaphar peels off the layer of the white perspective of history, by literally drawing back the curtain of the Thomas Jefferson portrait. This curtain might be representative of the attempts to cover up the brutalities that black people faced during slavery, but by drawing this curtain open, Kaphar impels his audience to see the truth. The portrait of Thomas Jefferson is mirrored, which, according to Art is Color, might indicate that we are viewing this portrait from behind, or from a different angle, one that we are not supposed to be seeing ( “Behind the Myth of Benevolence by Titus Kaphar: Great Art …show more content…
In the portrait of Thomas Jefferson, the colors used are white and brighter than that of the portrait behind. This demonstrates the contrast between the circumstances of each portrait. In history, Jefferson held a great deal of power and lived comfortably as a beneficiary of slavery. In the portrait of Jefferson, this is represented through the color white and the warm tones. Contrasting this, the portrait of the woman has a darker color palette and contains cool tones. In the background, the woman is surrounded by a lot of dark space. This conveys an ominous tone that reflects the atrocities that Black women faced at the hands of white slave owners. The juxtaposition of the warm and cool tones illustrates the real-life tension between the two figures. In the portrait of the woman, there are various iconographic elements illustrated, such as the woman’s blue and gold headwrap, the golden water pitcher, the table covered with a blue mantle, and the golden wash basin. These pops of colors are uncharacteristic for this portrait considering its black background. According to Art in Color, one might assume that the elements portrayed in the painting are the woman’s most prized possessions, highlighting that she did not have much (“Behind the Myth of Benevolence by Titus Kaphar: Great Art Explained”). Opposingly, these elements might also serve to heighten the
( Gaines pg: 8) This is a perfect example on how the attorney believes Jefferson is guilty in his case because in the end he gave the jury a mental image for a moment to vision Jefferson being guilty and then comparing the relationship on whether it matters to keep this man alive or not. All the evidence the attorney had to present Jefferson’s defense showed how much of a difference it is to be black rather then white in the
He also would paint political figures such as George Washington , Thomas Jefferson , Andrew Jackson , John Quincy Adams , and Senator Thomas
The variety of dangers during the colonies time under Britain including men without aid corresponds to the current live of slavery. Since Jefferson is not of color, he cannot imagine but acknowledge the slaves’ current circumstances. Banneker’s view of freedom is the “peculiar blessing of Heaven” with freedom and tranquility. However, Banneker wishes this freedom to everyone, including his brethren under slavery, therefore, he asks Jefferson to give his kindness and benevolence to these brethren in hopes of freedom.
Thomas Jefferson was a founding father and the third president of the United States. He is an important part of American history and most people have a positive image of him. Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia provides an instant shock to the reader by revealing a very negative side of the third president of the United States. In this work, he is very detailed in providing a undesirable description of the characteristics of African-Americans. His choice of words makes it easy to see how African-Americans and people in general could be offended by reading this part of his work.
Given that a majority are discriminated and judged by the color of one’s skin, Grant would be entitled to assist in redirecting the focus of equality of African Americans through Jefferson. As seen in the conversation with Grant and Vivian at the Rainbow Club, Grant described a common struggle in the black community that dealt with the perception of black folks. In society, the white man has enforced an overpowering burden being racism and prejudice among the African American population that called the need for reform. Grant goes on to suggest that Jefferson serves as the people’s savior as it was “It's up to Jefferson my love.”(p164) He suggests that Jefferson will end the oppression that the whites have implemented towards them, as he would learn to stand up for himself and others.
Common forms of segregation of the black community were actions such as having them sit at the back of public buses and designating different drinking fountains as seen in my visual piece. Another quote stated within the court “A white man had been killed during a robbery, and though two of the robbers had been killed on the spot, one had been captured, and he, too, would have to die.” the use of adjectives in this shows the balance of power between the two races and implies that if they robber had been white he would have been convicted differently. The use of the image portraying slavery emphasizes the injustice and little power the black community struggled with. Other examples of this power imbalance is shown consistently throughout the book, for example the quote "I have no idea."
Thomas Jefferson video portrayed two public figures who built America fighting to become president in 1800. The video presents pathos because of the emotions shared between the two. Before they became rivals, they were best of friends. They started making negative comments about each other. This video does not portray logos because there was no evidence to proof what either of them was saying was true.
Finkelman explains how Jefferson owned and abused slaves even though he declared that all men are created equal. In “The Monster of Monticello,” Paul Finkelman states, “He sometimes punished slaves by selling them away from their families and friends, a relation that was incomprehensibly cruel even at the time” (Finkelman 8). In other words, Jefferson treated his slaves extremely cruelly, even for the environment and the time. Jefferson had the power to have slaves and mistreat them, and he took that opportunity. Finkelman wants the readers to learn about Jefferson, who he truly was, and his behavior towards his slaves.
He did not think that African Americans as a people were equal to whites. In fact, he deduced that blacks “are inferior to the whites in the endowments of both body and mind.” (Magnis) He came to this conclusion because as a scientist, Jefferson speculated that blackness might have come from the color of the blood, suggesting that there was something genetically wrong with African Americans. He also felt that blacks could not reason as rationally as whites did, and that “in imagination they are dull, tasteless, and anomalous.”
Catlett does a good job at getting her point across about advocating for social justice in her paintings. She has a similar sculpture called “Mother and Child” which portrays an African American woman cradling her baby. The sculpture represents that black women are courageous maternal figures. She does this to “reflect us, to relate to us, to stimulate us, to make us aware of our potential,” (Catlett). By doing so she was able to win numerous Nobel piece
Jefferson received slaves from his father in-law and any slave who had children, he would treat them as property and sold them for a profit. prevents them from engaging in Jefferson’s pursuit of happiness as well. Like women, these actions prevented African slaves to pursue Jefferson’s philosophy of happiness
Jefferson’s execution day is set and everyone is waiting for the inevitable and to see if Jefferson and Grant can prove the whites wrong, that Jefferson is not a ‘hog’ but a man. Jefferson holds his head up high as he is lead to his execution and proves he is just as much a man as anyone,
Moreover, Jefferson submits the following quote in his notes on the state of Virginia in 1789: “That the blacks, whether originally a distinct race, or made distinct by time and circumstances, are inferior to the whites in the endowments both of body and mind”. (Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia:1789). Conversely, Jefferson changes his opinion of slavery for means of self
Black women are treated less than because of their ascribed traits, their gender and race, and are often dehumanized and belittled throughout the movie. They are treated like slaves and are seen as easily disposable. There are several moments throughout the film that show the racial, gender, and class inequalities. These moments also show exploitation and opportunity hoarding. The Help also explains historical context of the inequality that occurred during that time period.