Jon Krakauer's Into The WIld glorifies the journey of a young man, Chris McCandless. In efforts to make his life better by living in solitude, McCandless traveled all across America for two years exploring all different places to find a challenging, yet hospitable, place for him to leave. Chris took this step in his life to escape family issues and harassment and successfully lived for two years as Alex McCandless traveling through the West, South, and making his way to the Alaskan wilderness where he unfortunately faced his downfall. In August of 1992 on the Alaskan Stampede trail, Chris died of starvation, and Krakauer tracked his footsteps and journey after three years to understand Chris as person and why he made the decisions he made. …show more content…
Some would argue that Chris McCandless was a reckless young man who made irrational decisions in life, however Jon Krakauer justifies his craziness by showing how Chris made an effort to be self reliant through his journey. By relying on his own powers and abilities to survive, Chris wanted to be independent and live completely on his own rather than being dependent on his family or the people he met along the way. Krakauer added a part of Chris’s journal in the book to support his way of thinking, “‘Mr. Franz I think careers are a 20th century invention and I don’t want one’” (Krakauer). In CHris’s letter to Krakauer, he wrote how picking careers and having a normal life in general was the old way of thinking and Chris wanted to be unique in his own way by living himself rather than have a normal life. Chris felt importance in living by himself and not following the society norm by going to college and picking a basic career, and his letter to Franz shows how he influenced other people to live in different ways outside the normal culture. In the article “On the Trail of Interdependence” Robert Moor states, “ The reliance on others involves both risk and reward: it allows us to expand beyond the boundaries of our individual bodies, but when the collective system that we rely on begins to buckle, it brings us all down with it” (Moor 4). Robert Moor supports Chris’s way of thinking in this NY Times article because he writes about the cost and benefit of relying on someone or something and even though it may seem easy in the beginning, it might never stay that way. At the end of the say, it is always a good idea to be independent and not rely on anyone else because only you can control yourself and know your limits. I think one of Chris’s main purpose in embarking on this journey was to become more self-reliant and learn to
In the book ‘’Into The Wild” (1996), by Jon Krakauer the author described the journey of a young man named Christopher Johnson McCandles. Who traveled different states of the United States as Alexander Supertramp. Jon Krakauer traces Alex’s journey into the wild by providing information from a third person point of view and also shares the comments of people whom encounter Alex throughout his journey that ended when Alex decided to hitchhiked to Alaska and travel by foot into the wilderness north of Mt. McKinley . The highest mountain in North America, with a summit elevation of 20,310 feet above sea level. Alex body was found four months later frozen and decomposed by a moose hunter.
Into the Wild was written by Jon Krakauer and describes the life of a young man named Christopher Johnson McCandless. Chris also went by the name of Alexander Supertramp, or Alex, to most people who he came across in order to stay off the grid. Chris ultimately abandoned his old way of life to achieve his long-term dream of visiting the Alaskan wilderness and living solely off the land. Throughout his journey, Chris hitchhiked his way to almost all of his locations.
Jon Krakauer’s fascination in a young man’s life turns out to be more than an article of the boy’s adventure and the journey he set out for himself. Krakauer reflects on much larger subjects within the book based on his path while trying to understand Chris McCandless. Chris McCandless, a young man from an East Coast family, abandons everything set for him in his path. Donating twenty-four-thousand-dollar savings account to charity, burning the cash he had, leaving his car and possessions behind were all decisions Chris thought were right for him. His confident yet riskful choices led him to an independent life in the wild.
Once again, we are tasked with writing another QVSR paper. “Find an epigraph that explains Krakauer’s purpose in writing this book”. In the guidelines, however, we received a very interesting thought to dwell on, “What is Krakauer’s purpose in this book?” Initially I was prepared to write this paper, and not even think for a second about why he might have wanted to script this nonfiction book. As you can already tell from my title, I think there is a simply explanation for that.
After his story went public, his unique characteristics inspired many people. In “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer, Christopher McCandless is characterized as non-materialistic and adventurous. Chris is characterized as non-materialistic in Krakauer’s book because he did not need an excessive amount of anything
(page 33). He also refused the offering to any gifts or money from his parents before he started his adventure. Some would say he is being ungrateful, but the quote shows just how dedicated and relentless he was to live a life he wanted for himself, not anyone else. Chris lived for the satisfaction of others, not for himself, and he was content in
To establish his credibility, Krakauer demonstrates extensive research of Chris’ life and correlates his life with Chris’; as a result, he discloses his deep connection with Chris. For example, Krakauer constructs a body of evidence to support his argument; however, Krakauer asserts that he is an “impartial biographer”
Chris was fully aware of these tyrannical actions his parents were dictating on his life: excel in education, finish high school, go to college, get a successful job. Chris reflects this in a letter to his sister, “‘so irrational, so oppressive, disrespectful and insulting that I finally passed my breaking point’” (qtd. in Krakauer 64). In his fragile state of mind due to repressed emotions formed by knowledge of his father’s affair, he became increasingly more contumacious. Henry Ticknor, a preacher, observes, “Chris never confronted his father with this [newfound] knowledge.
By relying on himself instead of others, Chris managed to embody one of the most important pillars of transcendentalism; to only focus on what he needs, not on what society tells him is
Into the Wild tells the story of Chris McCandless, a young man who embarked on an adventure across the U.S. Chris lived for adventure, and sadly met his demise in the Alaskan wilderness. Chris’ death brought about a large debate as to whether Chris was insane or simply idealistic. Krakauer wrote Into the Wild to prove Chris’ sanity and soundly completes that task by using rhetorical devices to persuade his audience. Throughout the book, Krakauer uses ethos to develop Chris’ credibility by providing examples of people who are similar to him. For example, Krakauer provides multiple examples of people who were very similar to Chris, such as Everett Ruess.
Chris’s whole life exemplifies what it means to be self-reliant. After Chris finished college, he gave all his college money to charity. He eventually lived on his own for some years and goes into the wild to live by himself. While in the wild, he finds a bus and stays there where in time he ends up dying. Inside the bus on a piece of weathered plywood he wrote “Two years he walks the Earth.
Attacking Krakauer’s supposed glorification of Chris McCandless, Medred believes that McCandless is nothing more than “a poacher, a bum and a thief”. While Medred utilizes irony and pathos throughout his article, author Jon Krakauer does a superior job at writing about the story of Chris McCandless due to his distinguished use of indirect characterization, parallelism, analepsis, and the rhetorical devices of ethos and pathos. Krakauer applies his ability to relate to McCandless due to their similar adversities and demonstrates his utmost care towards discovering the truth of Chris’ story, while Medred fails to identify Chris’ past and presents his profound partiality. Jon Krakauer’s ultimate dedication to displaying the true events of Chris’s journey is displayed through his dedication to interviewing Chris’ relatives. While interviewing Chris’ sister, Carine, Krakauer determines that “‘Chris was crazy about Buck,’ Carine says… ‘Chris didn’t think twice about risking his own life, but he never would have put Buckley in any kind of danger’”
The importance of relationships on one’s happiness Defining a fulfilling life can be a rather difficult task because one may not know what proponents of their life make it enjoyable. One way to define a happy life is having people that are constantly supporting one another and caring for each other as well. Similarly, in the nonfiction novel, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, Christopher McCandless goes through much of his life not knowing how to find pure happiness. Chris was the son of wealthy parents, and he attended Emory University after high school. He was also a top student and athlete.
“If you are always trying to be normal, you will never know how amazing you can be.” ―Maya Angelou. Jon Krakauer’s true story titled Into the Wild is about a man who decides to throw away his old life and escape the rules of conventional society. Twenty-two-year-old Chris McCandless came from a well-to-do family in Virginia and, without warning, abandons everything. He changes his name, loses contact with his family, gives away his car and all his money, and begins a two-year long journey hitchhiking to Alaska where he eventually dies of starvation.
Based on a real story, Into the Wild can make us think from different perspectives about what the main character Christopher McCandless did. Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is a dramatic but also remarkable story from a young, newly graduated, college student that escaped for a long wild journey but never came back. As time passes throughout the book, the reader may notice how the main character interacts with society and nature, finally McCandless dies in the wild but even though he was struggling for survival he died happy. Some people never get out of their comfort zone, others are tired of it and retire from their comfort zone to have different experiences in life, some are good enough or some are terrible.