Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

744 Words3 Pages

The Supreme Court's choice in Miranda v. Arizona tended to four unique cases including custodial cross examinations. In each of these cases, the accused was addressed by cops or an indicting lawyer in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world. In none of these cases was the accused given a full and compelling cautioning of his rights at the start of the cross examination process. In every case, the scrutinizing evoked oral confirmations and, in three of them, signed statements that were conceded at trial. “Miranda was arrested at his home and taken in custody to a police station where he was identified by the complaining witness. He was then interrogated by two police officers for two hours, which resulted in a signed, written …show more content…

“Miranda written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty ("Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona," n.d.). Miranda v. Arizona: After Miranda's conviction was revoked by the Supreme Court, the State of Arizona retried him. At the second trial, Miranda's admission was not brought into evidence. Miranda was indeed indicted and condemned to 20-30 years in jail. The justice system changed by this case because, the prosecution may not utilize proclamations, regardless of whether exculpatory or inculpatory, originating from custodial cross examination of the respondent unless it shows the utilization of procedural protections powerful to secure the benefit against self-implication.“The apex of the individual-rights emphasis in Supreme Court decisions was reached in the 1966 case of Miranda v. Arizona, which established the famous requirement of a police “rights advisement” of suspects” (Schmalleger, 2018, p. 198). Furthermore the miranda rights are now included in the 5th …show more content…

The attacker dragged her into his vehicle, tied her hands and forced her to lie down in the back seat. After driving for 20 minutes, the man stopped outside of the city and sexually assaulted her. He requested she give him her cash and advised her to lie down again in the back seat. Then dropped her off a few blocks away from her home. Considering rape is a felony offense in Arizona and is considered a class two (2) felony, up to 14 years in prison. If the defendant has a prior felony sexual assault conviction up to 21 years in prison. If two (2) or more prior convictions, up to 28 years in prison ("13-1406 - Sexual assault; classification; increased punishment,"

More about Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Miranda V. Arizona

Open Document