The Sexual Offence Act 2003 define rape as: ‘The accused (A) intentionally penetrated the vagina, anus or mouth of the complainant (B) with his penis. That B did not consent to the penetration, and that A did not reasonably believe that B consented (Wykes and Welsh ,2009 :112-113). To prove rape these three factors ‘must prove by the prosecution beyond all reasonable doubt’ (Wykes and Welsh ,2009: 112-113).
Theoretically, there is a clear difference between the definition of rape when it comes to a single perpetrator and when involves two or more offenders (Etgar & Pragner, 2009). However, according to Horvath & Kelly (2009) the definition of gang rape can be difficult because of the terminology that is used when it involves a gang rape
…show more content…
One theory is the patriarchal power and control. This theory explains rape as an aggressive act and not as a sexual act, also rape is a mean of all men to keep women under fear. Also, rape according to radical feminism is a gender-based crime and support the patriarchal structures (McPhail, 2015:316). This theory changed the terminology and the victims renamed survivors and rape renamed as sexual assault to focus on the crime and not at the sexual part (McPhail, 2015:316). One other theory is the normative heterosexuality perspective. According to MacKinnon (1989) ‘rape is not an isolated event or moral transgression, or individual interchange went wrong but an act of terrorism and torture within a systemic context of group subjugation, like lynching’ (MacKinnon, 1989 cited in McPhail.2015:318). In this theory, masculinity plays a virtual role. The aggression against women creates a sexual pleasure and masculinity maintains the gender hierarchy. According to heterosexuality perspective, women fight not only the rape but also to control and define their sexuality (McPhail, 2015:318).
Furthermore, feminist thinking gave emphasis to the “breaking the silence” around rape. The feminist approach has shown that rape is not a rare phenomenon, it is basically a common phenomenon that many girls and women face. Feminist approach claims that in order to
…show more content…
The feminists change these traditional views about rape and now rape is considered a crime against the victim itself (Feminist Perspectives on Rape, 2009). Burgess & Jackson (1996), argue that the fines or the compensations ware paid to the father or to the husband for the raped woman (Burgess & Jackson (1996) cited in (Feminist Perspectives on Rape, 2009). Another example is the marital rape. It is not a crime when a man forces his wife to have sex, because the woman is his property. Moreover, women who were not the property of a man, like prostitutes, and being raped, was not an important issue, because no one was harmed by their rape. Feminist’s through years have successful change the legal definition of rape and the sexist practices in rape trials (Feminist Perspectives on Rape, 2009). For example, the ‘rape shield’ law changed and now the evidence about the sexual history of the victims is not considered. Moreover, the ‘prompt reporting’ requirement is eliminated by the most jurisdictions. These assumptions, especially the assumption that rape can happen only to women with pure sexual life or the assumption that women often lie about being raped, changed because of the feminists. Feminists have founded and staffed rape crisis centers in order to eliminate the sexism and changed the laws about rape, as well as the
Furthermore, Griffin commonly sites credible studies and explores historical moments to provide context and support for her claims. One article in particular written by Griffin (1971) demonstrates her masterful use of ethos, “Rape: The All-American Crime.” This article was the first of its kind as it discusses rape from a feminist perspective and challenges common beliefs about rape. Up until this point rape and sexual violence was rarely discussed and when it was it was by a man. Griffin begins the article by explaining her credentials, describing her personal experiences with rape culture in America, and illustrating the urgency with which women and victims need to be heard.
Rape myths are at the center of the problem of how rape and sexual assault cases are looked at, and treated as in society. Rape myths vary, some excuse the rape, others try to minimize the severity of the situation, while others doubt the act even happened in the first place (Levit and Verchick, 196). Some examples of rape myths include: a victim was “asking for it,” a victim’s previous sexual history, regretful sex is not rape, a woman’s “no” means “yes,” and women lie about rape all the time. Rape myths are targeted towards women, not the rapist. Despite, rape myths being proved false by empirical evidence, they are still prevalent in society.
Cathy Young, in her article titled “Feminists want us to define these ugly sexual encounters as rape. Don’t let them,” takes up the claim that the definition of, and by consequence social and legal ramifications for “rape” has extended past the scope of reason. Young explored her claim by providing examples of personal sexual encounters she has had with various men, and how she does not feel as though these men should be thrown under the bus, where modern feminists would be quick to the task. She goes on to describe the ways in which possible counter arguments are flawed logically. Young takes up an opposing viewpoint to an increasingly popular feministic mantra in order to convince those unconvinced or unfamiliar with third-wave feminism that
“Only women can put a stop to the “open season” on women by strangers”(The Writer’s Presence PG:813). The author Leslie Silko, believes a different life for women is just around the corner. “95,000 women are raped annually with roughly 1070 rapists being convicted” (Independent.co). With
Sexual assault has been a controversial issue over a long period of time, with many new laws taking place all over the world. In this essay, we will be discussing the changing of laws & attitudes surrounding sexual assault in NSW over the past 4 decades. Sexual assault is the sexual contact or behaviour towards an unconsenting indivual, for example; unwanted kissing or touching. This also includes rape, incest, child abuse etc. In NSW sexual assault is heavily prohibited under the Crimes Act 1900.
A person (D) is guilty of this offence if he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (V) with his penis and V does not consent to the penetration and D does not reasonably believe that V consents. Since rape is restricted to penile penetration it can only be committed by a man on a woman or another man and can only be dealt with in the crown court and any person guilty of this offence can be imprisoned for life. Rape can also happen when the victim cannot physically give consent, such as whilst she was drunk, passed out or high. Rape can also happen when the victim cannot legally give consent, such as if she is underage. Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.
As rape laws in the United States and other capitalist countries were originally enacted to protect the wives and daughters of upper class men, little to no effort went into prosecuting the men who raped Black women. Lynching and rape, two race/gender-specific forms of sexual violence, merged with their ideological justifications of the rapist and prostitute in order to provide an effective system of social control over
Through gender socialization women are told to stay quiet when it comes to rape and those women are blamed for what happened to them. The patriarchy that still is very prevalent in the college systems today have allowed for this behavior. Gender stratification has allowed for men to get away with their crimes and has forced women to remain silent. When women do speak up they are discriminated against and are called radical feminist. Many feminist movements have started to bring awareness to this issue and are trying to make the world we live in more just for the women who are struggling to have their voice be heard.
When questioned about rape, especially most women, they might think or even picture a stranger coming out of a dark place to assault someone. But in reality there’s more to it. According to the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, “About half of all people who are raped know the person who attacked them. This is known as date rape — forced sex that can happen not only on a date, but also somewhere like a party with someone the victim may know, like, or even be interested in.” Furthermore, social critic and feminist, Camille Paglia, has been discussing this persisting issue about date rape with a personal stance that many women may disagree with.
Beginning in the 1970s, state legislatures and courts expanded and redefined the crime of rape to reflect modern notions of equality and legal propriety. Modernly, rape includes even "slight penile penetration of female sex organs" by any thing, penis or other object; by sodomy and/or oral sex. Generally, the modern common law definition is: Penetration of a woman's vagina, however slight, without her consent. The consent must be equatable. Hence, if a woman is unconscious or drugged up, the consent is not valid.
At the beginning of the book, in the author’s notes, Krakauer states, “Rape is a much more common crime than most people realize, and women of college age are most frequently the victims.” Most college students are already on edge, especially because of the new environment and people, and introducing them to the possibility of being raped adds a new level of terror for many. Rape can scare anyone and tends to intrude on someone’s piece of mind. [5] Sadly, there is a higher probability that a rape will occur by someone an individual knows; for example, significant others, siblings, friends, and even parents than a complete stranger. Krakauer shows his readers what happens to a person when they are raped; he tells of the emotional and physical damage that can come from the rumors spread, the court cases, and the dirty feelings, and he stands to support victims of rape and stop people from falling victim to this
“Although concerning sexual practices between adults and children have existed throughout history and across cultures, whether such behavior was conceived of and defined as ‘abuse’ has been dependent on the societal values of the particular period” (Denov, 2004). In today’s society, sex offending has become an increasingly, concerning phenomenon that individuals must become more aware of. Although generally regarded as a male phenomenon, over time, female perpetrators have become equally important as male perpetrators. Due to the lack of public awareness, female sexual predators go unreported. As a result, society must become more aware of female sexual perpetrators, as many incidents of females assaulting both young men and women have gone unreported for some time.
Positivists think of victims of rape as people who most likely are partly responsible for the offence happening. The positivist ideologies such as victim precipitation and also victim proneness lead to said victim being blamed for the attack against them, instead of the blame being placed on the perpetrator. Feminists think of victims of rape as nothing else other than someone who has been targeted and become a victim of an offence that is the fault of another. Feminist ideologies such as intersectionality show that it is the small things that make up a person that increase or decrease their likelihood of becoming a victim of rape. Although they may be seen as being more likely due to their race, religion, social class, gender, age and sexuality, it does not mean they are to blame for the offence against them.
Sexual assault is a very controversial issue in our society. The video by Mini Law, Understanding Sexual Assault Law, gives a detailed overview of Sexual Assault Law. It is presented by Professor Elaine Craig, from the Schulich School of Law. In her presentation she explains that the fundamentals of sexual assault law are the definition of sexual assault, definition of consent and rules of evidence. Overall, Sexual Assault Law in Canada is flawed and there is a lot of reform that must still be done.
Apparently, men do fear of women; and they put their fear on display with various exhibitions of hatred, which is sweeping broadly, cross-culturally, consecutively over time as a result of mental perturbation, not an endeavour to generate and elevate beneficial environment for a male-biased system. Described as one of men’s psychological anxiousness, misogyny owes its origin to “identical experiences of male’s development cycle, rather than causes by the environment alone” (2001). In other words, men’s development cycle is to blame for their inner struggle; and without uttering it directly, the implied word is “mother” and/ or “wife”. Ultimately, his work on misogyny itself is misogynistic because the underlying message is clear: despite being left with no voice and just a few choices, being victims of brutality, violence and hatred, women themselves are the root of the