Texting While Driving Should Be Banned Essay

Cars have been regulated greatly since 1921 and the death toll has gone down to 95 percent for every 100 million miles driven, if we regulate guns the way we do with cars the death toll could also go down greatly and we wouldn't have to worry about these shootings happening. Additionally, we can also have tighter gun laws to help reduce gun violence. According to Nicolas Kristoff in "How to Reduce Shootings", tightening gun laws would

The world today is dependent on cellular devices, that even includes being attached to a phone while driving a car. Should someone be able to text while one is driving? Texting while driving is really bad and has killed many people in the world, so why is it still legal? Truthfully though laws are amazing in theory, but not everyone will follow them. Texting should be banned by the government because a law, because without one it can only go down hill.

Do you think texting while walking should be banned? The first reason was there has been deaths and serious injuries from distracted walkers while they where on their phones. the second reason was also people need to be responsible and pay attention to their surroundings while walking and people need to be aware of there surrounding and don’t need to look at their phone more then they do the sidewalk. For example, according to the article Take Steps to Avoid Injury While Walking there has been way more fatalities injury’s form distracted walkers while they where on their phones.”According to federal data on highway fatalities, there were 5,987 pedestrian fatalities in 2016 – the highest number since 1990. This represents increase of 9% over the 2015 totals.” For instance, 2014, a 14 year old was seriously injured after stepping off a bridge while on his phone while listening to music and on snap chat.

[HOD-cause] Our subject, while intoxicated after a party, chose to drive home saying, “It is of no value whether I can drive safely or not, as long as the other drivers on the road do their part to avoid accidents.” [HOD-epilogue] He thought if the other drivers are safe, why does it matter if I am? [HOP-honor] This is a deliberate disobedience of the law, and putting innocent people in direct danger for which he should be thrown, bang, [onomatopoeia] into the slammer. Comparison [Analogy-consequence] Texting while driving is a bad crime, but drunk driving is worse. When you text you temporarily distract yourself by looking away from the road and focusing on your phone, endangering those around you, [pragmatographia] but when you drink and drive you are driving without the ability to make right judgement, and therefore are distracted and endanger those around you the entire time you are driving. [HOD-epilogue] Although texting, temporary distraction, is bad, driving under the influence, constantly deconcentrated, is much worse.

If a person is in their tracks, it’s completely okay to hit them because they have a place to be. Lastly, they argue that driver’s tests do not teach you how to merge. When Jessica got a ticket for reckless driving, because she merged incorrectly, she was confused. She was expecting to be excused from the ticket since she was not tested on the driver’s test for merging. But texting while driving is never okay because nothing is that important, and nothing is that urgent that rushing through a red light/stop sign is necessary because it may cause a really horrific accident with lives lost.

C. Solution: influencing and convincing people to not use their cell phone while driving to decrease or have zero deaths or injuries each year in car collisions caused by cell phone use. • Some do not realize that the use of cell phone while driving can distract you in many ways ➢ While driving there are three main types of distraction visual, manual, cognitive. Taking your eyes of the road is visual distracting for example looking at your phone. Taking your hand of the wheel is manual distraction for example having your phone in hand and not on the wheel. Lastly taking your mind off the road is cognitive distraction for example conversation on the phone while driving.

So the teenagers are the main benefit because of many reasons but unfortunately they would take subject of raise driving age as a punishment. Raise driving age would save teenagers lives. Expects said that teenagers brains are not completely progress until the teenage years passed so they would not take driving seriously and they never think that they may have death accident in the beginning. For example, when the teenager start driving, his driving will be unsafe because he does not have the ability to understand how dangerous it is. In other words, teenagers should be more mature and trustworthy to deserve

Regarding the statement that whether citizens in United States should own guns, some people would say that arming themselves can prevent tragedy from occurring, while others assume that owning guns has been caused some problems and risks of violent events yearly.I tend to agree that guns for citizens should be reasonably banned in United States because of to reduce deaths from shootings and feasible solutions of gun-banning life. Guns in America has been already caused a large number of problems such as shooting and killing events. Guns are sometimes not considered as defending tools. Instead, they become dangerous toys and even for entertainment because some of youth consider that holding a real gun like characters in movies excites them. Some of them do not have the consciousness that guns can be factually used to kill livings.

Well, having fun and going out to dinner later and riding around late at night should not be banned because they think we should have a curfew. One way we could stop them from enforcing that law is that they are not our parents. They should not be the ones telling us when to come back home and how long we can stay out, our parents should. As Kimberly Ellis states “The law does not help rebuild residents, trust in the police, and ‘gives the impression that we don’t know how to raise our kids.’” Also they think all teens are bad, and are criminals. Which they can’t prove that because a lot of kids are not, and don’t do anything wrong.

This scenario occurs in many families and cars around the country, and while many smokers realize the potential, deadly effects on their own bodies, they do not realize the deadly effects on their passengers. Therefore, legislation should ban smoking in cars carrying children under the age of eighteen. By smoking while carrying children in the car, parents, guardians, or other adults neglect the adolescent passengers from their right to live without secondhand smoke-induced health complications. Sadly, children may disagree with their parents smoking, but they do not have a choice but to live with their guardian’s habit. Doctors have shared chilling stories about parents exposing their children to tobacco use.