Christina McBarron Ms. McManus English II Honors 5 April 2023 The Unprofessional Case of Adnan Syed Adnan Syed was only seventeen years old when the police visited his home in the middle of the night and violently shook him awake and removed him from his own bed. With officers haranguing him saying, “We know what you did”, the defenseless teenager was bewildered. Adnan never saw this coming, as he had no idea what he was being arrested for. He was later tried and found guilty of the first-degree murder of Hae Min Lee. On the surface, it would appear that Adnan Syed committed this crime. He was named the main suspect because of his connection with Hae Min Lee as her ex-boyfriend. Also, there was testimony given by Jay Wilds, who directly states …show more content…
On top of that, he was convicted and given a life sentence in prison. Adnan had spent over fifteen years there with no chance of getting out until the hit podcast, Serial hosted by Sarah Koeing, brought new facts to light about this shut-and-closed case. This podcast as well as, Undisclosed created by Rabia Chaudry, Susan Simpson, and Colin Miller, both explain and analyze the facts of the case: known and unknown. With this all in mind, the court unfairly convicted Adnan Syed. To start, the court wrongfully accepted the discombobulated testimony of Jay Wilds. Jay Wilds was the year above Adnan and Hae but still hung around the school because of his girlfriend, Stephanie. Jay worked in a pornographic store and had previously been arrested for selling pot (Episode 4). Jay had already had a rap sheet, yet his testimony was still fully accepted without question. There was little debate over the fact that Jay could have been lying. This makes no sense, as he already had a track record of being a criminal. His testimony should have been further investigated at the least because of this. However, it was not, and since Jay was the only witness to the burial of the body, his word was …show more content…
The court should not have accepted Jay’s testimony. He had a known rap sheet that was promptly ignored by the police. The multiple tellings of his story varied from time to time, and his stories were coached by the police. He is unreliable, and should not have been ignored as a suspect altogether. Adnan also had an ineffective council. Cristina Guiterez angered the jury and blatantly disregarded evidence about a potential alibi. The jury was also biased towards Jay, and biased against Adnan when he did not speak on his own behalf. All of these factors contributed to his guilty conviction. Had they been reassessed, he would have been named innocent. Adnan was only a teenager when he was originally convicted of the crime of Hae Min Lee, however, the only people who were acting childish were the police, the jury, and Cristina Gutierrez. Adnan handled his trial in a respectable and mature manner, however, the same can not be said about those around him. If only all aspects of the court had been respected, and Jay’s testimony not accepted, Adnan may have been walking free today. Instead, he remains locked away as a result of the faulty trial he
In episode 7, Sarah admits to Deirdre Enright, who works at the University Of Virginia School Of Law and runs their Innocence Project clinic, that there isn’t any “gross negligence or malfeasance or something on the part of the detectives or the State Attorney’s office, everyone seems to be doing their job, responsibly.” The people working on the case were doing their jobs correctly, and Adnan was convicted, not because the case was built for his conviction, but because the evidence and other information collected pointed to Adnan’s guilt. And Jim Trainum, the detective hired by the Serial staff, tells Sarah that “the detectives in this case were cautious and methodical. They weren’t rushing to grab suspects or to dismiss them either. The evidence collection was well documented,” and that the case is “better than average” (Ep. 8, Jim).
Obsidian Mekediak Tyler Bonnette RD 117 19 Dec 2022 Rhetorical Analysis of Sarah Koenig’s ‘Serial’ Adnan Syed was convicted for the murder of Hae Min Lee February 25, 2000. Syed has claimed his innocence since he was arrested. Syed’s conviction was based on Jay Wilds’ testimony. Wilds claimed Syed had strangled Hae Min Lee, and convinced Wilds to help bury her body. Sarah Koenig’s initial purpose of creating the podcast ‘Serial’ and investigating the conviction of Adnan Syed for the murder of Hae Min Lee was to conclude if the state's case against Syed was flawed and in doing that, Koenig was successful.
Adnan Syed vs. Justice system Adnan Syed is a famous figure who is widely known for being the subject of the first serial season of the popular podcast ‘’Serial “. He was born in Baltimore and was serving a life sentence until his release in 2022 for a murder he was convicted for in 2000.During his trial for the murder of high school classmate Hae Min Lee, his then attorney represented him poorly,contributing multiple factors leading to his imprisonment. Since then, advocates for Syed believe he was wrongly accused of the crime. On January 13, 1999 The body of Hae min lee was found in Leakin Park by a worker there. The detectives’ Main suspect was the ex-boyfriend Adnan Syed, Based on the story of only one key witness, Jay, Adnan was dragged out of his home and put in handcuffs.
In Episode 1, host Sarah Koenig highlights how the prosecution's timeline of events is riddled with inconsistencies and relies heavily on the memory of key witnesses, including Jay Wilds. Jay's changing story is documented in Episode 8, where he admits to providing false statements during the trial. It's worth noting that the prosecution's case against Adnan Syed relied heavily on circumstantial evidence,
and what’s wrong based on what they hear. “The cops interview him at least four times that I know about. Two of those are on tape. And Jay also tells this story at trial – not once, but twice cause the first proceeding ended in a mistrial. So, at least, say, six times he's told what happened.
This evidence shows and should have shown back in 1999 tha Jay was not a credible source and should not have been
Jay himself even told the jury that he was not telling the cops everything that he knew. Jay was only telling the cops what he wanted
Jay has the main picture drawn out right for the police to link the murder case to Adnan with the help of Adnan’s cell phone records. This is where the conviction starts. Adnan panicks as he get a certain phone call
Imagine being a senior in the final year of high school--someone who plays sports, gets decent grades, and has many friends. Such a scenario is fairly common for many American students, as it was for eighteen year old Adnan Syed until he was arrested and charged with the murder of his ex-girlfriend. Syed’s case was relatively unknown beyond his local community; he was convicted and imprisoned. Then, a podcast called Serial came out, his story gained an incredible amount of attention, questions arose, and people started debating whether or not he really did commit murder. Despite the uncertainty that the podcast instigated among listeners, the evidence presented in the trial indicates Adnan Syed did, in fact, commit the murder and deserved his prison sentence.
Jenn testified that, no, Jay would not have called her to find out where Patrick was,” (in-text citation). Jay has switched his remembrance of the day to better match the evidence that the police had. This is giving himself more credibility which causes Syed to look more and more guilty. Though the changes matched the story they still did not make full sense and were rebuked by people called that day. This should raise a red flag in the minds of the prosecution, but with most of the mistakes made by Jay, it was ignored.
Your honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, opposing counsel, my name is Piper Travis, representing the defendant in this action. My client Adnan Syed was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit. He was imprisoned for 15 years for supposedly murdering his former girlfriend, eighteen-year-old Hae Min Lee even though there was no proper evidence to convict him. One of his friends at the time, Jay, claims that Adnan killed Hae, but the inconsistencies in his story should make him more of a prime suspect in this case rather than Adnan. He states that Syed killed Lee and later showed him the body inside a Best Buy parking lot, and they later buried the body at Leakin Park.
January 13th, 1999 a 17-year-old girl named Hae is manually strangled, to death. Six weeks later Hae’s ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed, is convinced of the murder. He is given a life sentence, plus thirty years, for his crime. Jay was the main witness at the trial. His story is as follows.
This includes two crucial details that, in the opinion of many, are difficult to mix up: whether or not Jay actually assisted in burying Hae's body, and where Adnan allegedly showed him Hae's body. In the first recorded interview with Jay, he stated that he was unwilling to assist Adnan in burying Hae's body and that Adnan had allegedly shown him the victim's body on Edmondson Avenue at 3:25 PM. On the contrary, Jay claims in his second recorded interview that he assisted in burying Hae's body and that Adnan allegedly showed him the body in a Best Buy parking lot. The mixing of these two details opposes the suspension of whether or not what he is testifying is accurate. Since seeing a body would be traumatic and not a simple memory you could easily mix up, explain to me how Jay would forget any of these details.
This story alone ultimately convicted Adnan. No physical evidence was ever found. Reporter Sarah Koenig realized the patchy story of this case
She states “A year after Adnan was arrested and the case came to trial, Jay walked up to the witness stand. There’s a moment when Adnan muttered something to him” (45). By Adnan calling Jay pathetic he showed that he couldn’t believe Jay would rat him out. This incident shows that Adnan is a liar and is mad at Jay for going to the police, showing that he is guilty. Even after controlling himself through the whole case he snapped when he saw the man that betrayed him.