William Mullins-Johnson, a victim of wrongful conviction, spent more than 11 years in prison for a crime that never occurred, due to egregious errors made by the physicians who conducted the post-mortem examination.
On June 26, 1993, twenty-two-year-old William Mullins-Johnson, or Bill for short, babysat his four-year-old niece, Valin. Valin had been running a fever earlier that day before she went to bed. The next morning Valin’s mother went into her daughter’s room and found Valin dead.
On June 27th 1993, Bill was arrested for the first degree murder and aggravated sexual assault of his niece.
Causes for Bill’s Wrongful Conviction
Evidence
A team of physicians formed by Dr. Rasaiah, Dr. Zehr, and Dr. Charles Smith, took Valin’s body to investigation. They came up with a conclusion was that Valin was suffocated to death between 8:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. on the night of June 26th. They also found that Valin had been subjected to chronic sexual abuse.
Trial
…show more content…
At Bill’s trial, the jury heard expert testimony from the now-discredited pathologist Charles Smith. He and other Crown expert witnesses testified that Valin had been abused and then strangled to death. Smith also testified that the four-year-old had been anally raped. Note that the jury made this conviction despite the fact that there was no physical evidence connecting him to Valin’s
Even when Michael’s new defense team, through the innocence project, found a crime that was eerily similar to the method of murder and subsequent events to the one that Michael was convicted of, the new prosecutor in Williamson County fought hard to keep DNA testing from taking place, even stating that they objected to the testing now because the defense hadn’t requested it before (Morton, 2014). There was further evidence of ineffectiveness in that the coroner who’d changed his estimated time of death between the autopsy and trial, had come under scrutiny for his findings in this case, as well as several others, with claims of gross errors “including one case where he came to the conclusion that a man who’d been stabbed in the back had committed suicide” (Morton, 2014). This was only one of the many injustices that were committed against Michael Morton throughout his trial. In August of 2006, the defense was finally granted permission to perform DNA testing on the items that had been taken from his wife’s body (Morton, 2014). Although this testing did not reveal any information about the guilty party, it did at least give Michael the knowledge that Chris was not sexually violated before or after her death (Morton,
On November 19, 1898, Ariel Tritondatter was arrested on the felony charges of first- degree murder and breaking & entering. An arraignment was later held on November 22, 1898, which Ariel Tritondatter was informed about the charges she was faced with. Additionally, Ariel Tritondatter soon entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity Ariel Tritondatter’s criminal trial was set in the Circuit Court with both a jury and a judge called “Syed Ahmed Khan”. The defendant, Ariel Tritondatter, almost didn’t converse throughout the trial, but soon she took a stand to defend herself.
The initial ruling was in favor of the plantiff, Mr. Alfred, however the Florida State Supreme Court later overturned that ruling, finding insufficient evidence to support the claim that the absence of valium as well as an immediate intubation would have changed the outcome. The specifics of the case can be reviewed at the following website:
The attorneys failed to proffer any evidence in support of Solomon’s legal business enterprise, which he established with legal proceeds from the medical malpractice lawsuit. Furthermore, the attorneys never proffered any evidence on his behalf, which proved ownership, control, actual or constructive, or possession of the vehicles stopped by police. According to residents and property records, neither Johnson brother owned, occupied, possessed or control a property located at Oso. The property allegedly had $1,868,759 in cash and although such a very odd number, aside from questioning the veracity of the cash receipts, the indictment states that Mr. Solomon Johnson owned the vehicles, property, and currency.
This represented the power and position of forensic pathology in the criminal justice system, which the Crown and defence rely on, but can end in incarcerations of innocent individuals, as shown in John’s case. In this investigation, rather than having evidence presented by a forensic pathologist, Dr. Dietrich was a clinical pathologist who was trained to determine causes of disease in living patients and not to perform post-mortem examinations to identify the causes of death. John’s trial was proceeded by an unqualified pathologist without training in the area required to provide medical evidence in criminal trials, which lead to misdiagnoses and John’s wrongful conviction. As well, rather than approaching evidence with an open mind “without preconceptions or presumptions about abuse”, Dr. Dietrich had initially believed Maxine’s death was a homicide, therefore demonstrating his bias and lean towards evidence supporting his view instead of the truthful information
Shane’s assessment was corroborated by descriptions of battered woman syndrome in various forms of literature, helping the jury understand the extent of Lavallee’s mental state that was affected by the abuse and the reasons for her action. After reviewing the evidence, the Court stated that “ Expert testimony is admissible to assist the fact-finder in drawing inferences in areas where the expert has relevant knowledge or experience beyond that of the lay person” (R v. Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852), because this applied to the jury’s process in deciding, by allowing them to understand the components of battered woman syndrome. Furthermore, a new trial would be unnecessary because the Court reasoned that both the jury and the trial judge were presented with enough admissible evidence to know that Lavallee was battered repeatedly and brutally by Rust throughout their relationship.
Throughout the court of Canada there has been many records of wrongfully convictions that have occured. Today we still investigate those cases and why this lead for an wrongful act. Thomas Sophonow, David Milgaard, and James Driskell are three of the many that were wrongfully convicted. They were all imprisoned for murder and served jail time for 5 or more years.
“He was charged under a Texas statute that prohibited desecration of a venerated object (including...a state or national flag).” In 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned the American flag as part of his demonstration against nuclear weapons. It started as an organized protest along the streets of Dallas, and ended up being an offensive act to witnesses of the scene. One could attempt to justify Gregory’s unlawful action as an expression of his First Amendment. However, as a justice on the US Supreme Court, I would have to agree with opinion B, because it appropriately supports the reason for Johnson’s conviction.
Primary Annotated Bibliography McCleskey v Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987) McCleskey v Kemp is a Supreme Court case that highlighted racism in the death penalty process. The petitioner in the case provided a controversial statistical study that correlated racism in death penalty sentencings. The Supreme Court Justices were asked to answer the question of whether or not the statistical study provided could substantiate that the sentence in the case violated the petitioner’s eighth and fourteenth amendment rights. This case will be the main focus of my research paper.
Ed Gein was born on August 27, 1906, in Plainfield, Wisconsin. Ed Gein was a serial killer whose gruesome crimes inspired many more criminals and horror films. His full name is Edward Theodore Gein(Ed Gein American Serial Killer). Ed Gein had a very rough childhood. His father was a violent Alcoholic and his mother verbally abused him( Ed Gein American Serial Killer).
The case of the Menendez brothers has long been a topic of heated debate in legal circles. The brothers were convicted of the brutal murders of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home in 1989. While some argue that the brothers should have been charged with manslaughter due to the physical and emotional abuse they suffered at the hands of their parents, others contend that the heinous nature of the crime warrants a murder charge. This essay will argue that the Menendez brothers should indeed be charged with manslaughter instead of murder, despite the counter claim that their crime was too heinous to warrant anything less than a murder charge.
Similarly, Kalief Browder lost a portion of his life in jail due to wrongful conviction. As mentioned in “Before The Law” an article published in The New Yorker, Browder was a 16 year old boy walking down the streets of the Bronx with a friend when he was approached by police officers, “An officer said that a man had just reported that they had robbed him.” Both Browder and his friend were taken down to the precinct and then to booking where his friend was let go, but he wasn’t. Since Browder had been on probation at the time the judge held him with a bail set at three thousand dollars, being charged with robbery, grand larceny, and assault. Seeing that the bail was was too expensive for his family to pay, Browder was sent to Rikers Island where he would spend 3 years awaiting a trial for a crime he didn’t commit.
“While there was no real evidence to support a charge of gang rape, the hysterical atmosphere surrounding the trial insured their conviction.” The nine boys were tried in court several times, with several public offenders and lawyers who did not put much effort into the
Throughout the novel, people start acting different towards Atticus because of the Tom Robinson trial. A few days before the trial a good friend of Atticus tries to kill him with a group of white men to hurt Tom Robinson, but in between the situation Scout gets involved by talking to Mr. Cunningham casually and the men leave. It was one night when Atticus was acting up, of course because of the Tom Robinson case which is the night before but Jem, Scout and Dill knew something else was going on. A crowd of men and the sheriff, Heck Tate, go to Atticus’s house the day before the Tom Robinson trial.
The discretion of the case was significant in the regard of the defense, which countered some contradicted evidences. The evidences from the trial and the hearing preliminaries have revealed that the children were coached. The testimony showed lack of credibility on the issues and showing the significance of the discretion on the defense. McMartin told his attorney that he did not do it and his attorney used his discretion and believed him.